Loading…
Prospective study on the reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional and digital lateral headfilms
The introduction of digital X-ray techniques offered a variety of new possibilities for digital image enhancement and exposure reduction. In order to compare the reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional and digital lateral headfilms 100 digital and 100 conventional lateral headfilm...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of orofacial orthopedics 2000, Vol.61 (2), p.91-99 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c198t-fcb16d149ed35678ac2dd63c0f6b7d75c3a97396ca3e7dba14b292a0cb3e89c93 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c198t-fcb16d149ed35678ac2dd63c0f6b7d75c3a97396ca3e7dba14b292a0cb3e89c93 |
container_end_page | 99 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 91 |
container_title | Journal of orofacial orthopedics |
container_volume | 61 |
creator | Hagemann, K Vollmer, D Niegel, T Ehmer, U Reuter, I |
description | The introduction of digital X-ray techniques offered a variety of new possibilities for digital image enhancement and exposure reduction. In order to compare the reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional and digital lateral headfilms 100 digital and 100 conventional lateral headfilms of patients attending our clinic were randomly selected. The digital cephalograms were obtained using storage phosphor plates in standard X-ray cassettes. All X-rays had been taken at 77 kV. For the digital images the mAs settings for conventional images minus 4 mAs were used. Two orthodontists traced each X-ray twice (21 reference points) at an interval of at least 1 week. The tracings were superimposed and the distances between the tracings of identical reference points were registered. The average reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks was significantly higher on the digitally obtained images, despite a reduction of radiation exposure of 23.7% in the digital images. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/BF01300351 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_BF01300351</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10783561</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c198t-fcb16d149ed35678ac2dd63c0f6b7d75c3a97396ca3e7dba14b292a0cb3e89c93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUE1LAzEUDKLYWr34AyRnYTXZ7CaboxarQkEPel6yyVs3mv0wSQv996ZU0NMM7817zAxCl5TcUELE7f2KUEYIK-kRmlNOy4wLWhwnXrAiK3PJZugshE9CSFkQfopmlIiKlZzO0ferH8MEOtot4BA3ZofHAccOsIfJj2ajbWOdjWncYg1Tp9zYQ_RWY6cG0yv_FfYXehy2MEQ7DsrhtMDGftiYuFMRfMIOlGmt68M5OmmVC3Dxiwv0vnp4Wz5l65fH5-XdOtNUVjFrdUO5oYUEk5yKSuncGM40aXkjjCg1U1IwybViIEyjaNHkMldENwwqqSVboOvDX50SBg9tPXmb_O5qSup9b_Vfb0l8dRBPm6YH8096KIr9AFzeax8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prospective study on the reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional and digital lateral headfilms</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Hagemann, K ; Vollmer, D ; Niegel, T ; Ehmer, U ; Reuter, I</creator><creatorcontrib>Hagemann, K ; Vollmer, D ; Niegel, T ; Ehmer, U ; Reuter, I</creatorcontrib><description>The introduction of digital X-ray techniques offered a variety of new possibilities for digital image enhancement and exposure reduction. In order to compare the reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional and digital lateral headfilms 100 digital and 100 conventional lateral headfilms of patients attending our clinic were randomly selected. The digital cephalograms were obtained using storage phosphor plates in standard X-ray cassettes. All X-rays had been taken at 77 kV. For the digital images the mAs settings for conventional images minus 4 mAs were used. Two orthodontists traced each X-ray twice (21 reference points) at an interval of at least 1 week. The tracings were superimposed and the distances between the tracings of identical reference points were registered. The average reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks was significantly higher on the digitally obtained images, despite a reduction of radiation exposure of 23.7% in the digital images.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1434-5293</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1615-6714</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF01300351</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10783561</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany</publisher><subject>Cephalometry - instrumentation ; Cephalometry - methods ; Cephalometry - statistics & numerical data ; Head - diagnostic imaging ; Humans ; Observer Variation ; Prospective Studies ; Radiation Dosage ; Radiography, Dental - instrumentation ; Radiography, Dental - methods ; Radiography, Dental - statistics & numerical data ; Radiography, Dental, Digital - instrumentation ; Radiography, Dental, Digital - methods ; Radiography, Dental, Digital - statistics & numerical data ; Reproducibility of Results</subject><ispartof>Journal of orofacial orthopedics, 2000, Vol.61 (2), p.91-99</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c198t-fcb16d149ed35678ac2dd63c0f6b7d75c3a97396ca3e7dba14b292a0cb3e89c93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c198t-fcb16d149ed35678ac2dd63c0f6b7d75c3a97396ca3e7dba14b292a0cb3e89c93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,4011,27905,27906,27907</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10783561$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hagemann, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vollmer, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niegel, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ehmer, U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reuter, I</creatorcontrib><title>Prospective study on the reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional and digital lateral headfilms</title><title>Journal of orofacial orthopedics</title><addtitle>J Orofac Orthop</addtitle><description>The introduction of digital X-ray techniques offered a variety of new possibilities for digital image enhancement and exposure reduction. In order to compare the reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional and digital lateral headfilms 100 digital and 100 conventional lateral headfilms of patients attending our clinic were randomly selected. The digital cephalograms were obtained using storage phosphor plates in standard X-ray cassettes. All X-rays had been taken at 77 kV. For the digital images the mAs settings for conventional images minus 4 mAs were used. Two orthodontists traced each X-ray twice (21 reference points) at an interval of at least 1 week. The tracings were superimposed and the distances between the tracings of identical reference points were registered. The average reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks was significantly higher on the digitally obtained images, despite a reduction of radiation exposure of 23.7% in the digital images.</description><subject>Cephalometry - instrumentation</subject><subject>Cephalometry - methods</subject><subject>Cephalometry - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Head - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Radiography, Dental - instrumentation</subject><subject>Radiography, Dental - methods</subject><subject>Radiography, Dental - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Radiography, Dental, Digital - instrumentation</subject><subject>Radiography, Dental, Digital - methods</subject><subject>Radiography, Dental, Digital - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><issn>1434-5293</issn><issn>1615-6714</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNUE1LAzEUDKLYWr34AyRnYTXZ7CaboxarQkEPel6yyVs3mv0wSQv996ZU0NMM7817zAxCl5TcUELE7f2KUEYIK-kRmlNOy4wLWhwnXrAiK3PJZugshE9CSFkQfopmlIiKlZzO0ferH8MEOtot4BA3ZofHAccOsIfJj2ajbWOdjWncYg1Tp9zYQ_RWY6cG0yv_FfYXehy2MEQ7DsrhtMDGftiYuFMRfMIOlGmt68M5OmmVC3Dxiwv0vnp4Wz5l65fH5-XdOtNUVjFrdUO5oYUEk5yKSuncGM40aXkjjCg1U1IwybViIEyjaNHkMldENwwqqSVboOvDX50SBg9tPXmb_O5qSup9b_Vfb0l8dRBPm6YH8096KIr9AFzeax8</recordid><startdate>2000</startdate><enddate>2000</enddate><creator>Hagemann, K</creator><creator>Vollmer, D</creator><creator>Niegel, T</creator><creator>Ehmer, U</creator><creator>Reuter, I</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2000</creationdate><title>Prospective study on the reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional and digital lateral headfilms</title><author>Hagemann, K ; Vollmer, D ; Niegel, T ; Ehmer, U ; Reuter, I</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c198t-fcb16d149ed35678ac2dd63c0f6b7d75c3a97396ca3e7dba14b292a0cb3e89c93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Cephalometry - instrumentation</topic><topic>Cephalometry - methods</topic><topic>Cephalometry - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Head - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Radiography, Dental - instrumentation</topic><topic>Radiography, Dental - methods</topic><topic>Radiography, Dental - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Radiography, Dental, Digital - instrumentation</topic><topic>Radiography, Dental, Digital - methods</topic><topic>Radiography, Dental, Digital - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hagemann, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vollmer, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niegel, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ehmer, U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reuter, I</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of orofacial orthopedics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hagemann, K</au><au>Vollmer, D</au><au>Niegel, T</au><au>Ehmer, U</au><au>Reuter, I</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prospective study on the reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional and digital lateral headfilms</atitle><jtitle>Journal of orofacial orthopedics</jtitle><addtitle>J Orofac Orthop</addtitle><date>2000</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>91</spage><epage>99</epage><pages>91-99</pages><issn>1434-5293</issn><eissn>1615-6714</eissn><abstract>The introduction of digital X-ray techniques offered a variety of new possibilities for digital image enhancement and exposure reduction. In order to compare the reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional and digital lateral headfilms 100 digital and 100 conventional lateral headfilms of patients attending our clinic were randomly selected. The digital cephalograms were obtained using storage phosphor plates in standard X-ray cassettes. All X-rays had been taken at 77 kV. For the digital images the mAs settings for conventional images minus 4 mAs were used. Two orthodontists traced each X-ray twice (21 reference points) at an interval of at least 1 week. The tracings were superimposed and the distances between the tracings of identical reference points were registered. The average reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks was significantly higher on the digitally obtained images, despite a reduction of radiation exposure of 23.7% in the digital images.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pmid>10783561</pmid><doi>10.1007/BF01300351</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1434-5293 |
ispartof | Journal of orofacial orthopedics, 2000, Vol.61 (2), p.91-99 |
issn | 1434-5293 1615-6714 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_BF01300351 |
source | Springer Link |
subjects | Cephalometry - instrumentation Cephalometry - methods Cephalometry - statistics & numerical data Head - diagnostic imaging Humans Observer Variation Prospective Studies Radiation Dosage Radiography, Dental - instrumentation Radiography, Dental - methods Radiography, Dental - statistics & numerical data Radiography, Dental, Digital - instrumentation Radiography, Dental, Digital - methods Radiography, Dental, Digital - statistics & numerical data Reproducibility of Results |
title | Prospective study on the reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional and digital lateral headfilms |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T09%3A02%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prospective%20study%20on%20the%20reproducibility%20of%20cephalometric%20landmarks%20on%20conventional%20and%20digital%20lateral%20headfilms&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20orofacial%20orthopedics&rft.au=Hagemann,%20K&rft.date=2000&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=91&rft.epage=99&rft.pages=91-99&rft.issn=1434-5293&rft.eissn=1615-6714&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF01300351&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E10783561%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c198t-fcb16d149ed35678ac2dd63c0f6b7d75c3a97396ca3e7dba14b292a0cb3e89c93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/10783561&rfr_iscdi=true |