Loading…

Prospective study on the reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional and digital lateral headfilms

The introduction of digital X-ray techniques offered a variety of new possibilities for digital image enhancement and exposure reduction. In order to compare the reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional and digital lateral headfilms 100 digital and 100 conventional lateral headfilm...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of orofacial orthopedics 2000, Vol.61 (2), p.91-99
Main Authors: Hagemann, K, Vollmer, D, Niegel, T, Ehmer, U, Reuter, I
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c198t-fcb16d149ed35678ac2dd63c0f6b7d75c3a97396ca3e7dba14b292a0cb3e89c93
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c198t-fcb16d149ed35678ac2dd63c0f6b7d75c3a97396ca3e7dba14b292a0cb3e89c93
container_end_page 99
container_issue 2
container_start_page 91
container_title Journal of orofacial orthopedics
container_volume 61
creator Hagemann, K
Vollmer, D
Niegel, T
Ehmer, U
Reuter, I
description The introduction of digital X-ray techniques offered a variety of new possibilities for digital image enhancement and exposure reduction. In order to compare the reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional and digital lateral headfilms 100 digital and 100 conventional lateral headfilms of patients attending our clinic were randomly selected. The digital cephalograms were obtained using storage phosphor plates in standard X-ray cassettes. All X-rays had been taken at 77 kV. For the digital images the mAs settings for conventional images minus 4 mAs were used. Two orthodontists traced each X-ray twice (21 reference points) at an interval of at least 1 week. The tracings were superimposed and the distances between the tracings of identical reference points were registered. The average reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks was significantly higher on the digitally obtained images, despite a reduction of radiation exposure of 23.7% in the digital images.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF01300351
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_BF01300351</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10783561</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c198t-fcb16d149ed35678ac2dd63c0f6b7d75c3a97396ca3e7dba14b292a0cb3e89c93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUE1LAzEUDKLYWr34AyRnYTXZ7CaboxarQkEPel6yyVs3mv0wSQv996ZU0NMM7817zAxCl5TcUELE7f2KUEYIK-kRmlNOy4wLWhwnXrAiK3PJZugshE9CSFkQfopmlIiKlZzO0ferH8MEOtot4BA3ZofHAccOsIfJj2ajbWOdjWncYg1Tp9zYQ_RWY6cG0yv_FfYXehy2MEQ7DsrhtMDGftiYuFMRfMIOlGmt68M5OmmVC3Dxiwv0vnp4Wz5l65fH5-XdOtNUVjFrdUO5oYUEk5yKSuncGM40aXkjjCg1U1IwybViIEyjaNHkMldENwwqqSVboOvDX50SBg9tPXmb_O5qSup9b_Vfb0l8dRBPm6YH8096KIr9AFzeax8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prospective study on the reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional and digital lateral headfilms</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Hagemann, K ; Vollmer, D ; Niegel, T ; Ehmer, U ; Reuter, I</creator><creatorcontrib>Hagemann, K ; Vollmer, D ; Niegel, T ; Ehmer, U ; Reuter, I</creatorcontrib><description>The introduction of digital X-ray techniques offered a variety of new possibilities for digital image enhancement and exposure reduction. In order to compare the reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional and digital lateral headfilms 100 digital and 100 conventional lateral headfilms of patients attending our clinic were randomly selected. The digital cephalograms were obtained using storage phosphor plates in standard X-ray cassettes. All X-rays had been taken at 77 kV. For the digital images the mAs settings for conventional images minus 4 mAs were used. Two orthodontists traced each X-ray twice (21 reference points) at an interval of at least 1 week. The tracings were superimposed and the distances between the tracings of identical reference points were registered. The average reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks was significantly higher on the digitally obtained images, despite a reduction of radiation exposure of 23.7% in the digital images.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1434-5293</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1615-6714</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF01300351</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10783561</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany</publisher><subject>Cephalometry - instrumentation ; Cephalometry - methods ; Cephalometry - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Head - diagnostic imaging ; Humans ; Observer Variation ; Prospective Studies ; Radiation Dosage ; Radiography, Dental - instrumentation ; Radiography, Dental - methods ; Radiography, Dental - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Radiography, Dental, Digital - instrumentation ; Radiography, Dental, Digital - methods ; Radiography, Dental, Digital - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Reproducibility of Results</subject><ispartof>Journal of orofacial orthopedics, 2000, Vol.61 (2), p.91-99</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c198t-fcb16d149ed35678ac2dd63c0f6b7d75c3a97396ca3e7dba14b292a0cb3e89c93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c198t-fcb16d149ed35678ac2dd63c0f6b7d75c3a97396ca3e7dba14b292a0cb3e89c93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,4011,27905,27906,27907</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10783561$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hagemann, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vollmer, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niegel, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ehmer, U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reuter, I</creatorcontrib><title>Prospective study on the reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional and digital lateral headfilms</title><title>Journal of orofacial orthopedics</title><addtitle>J Orofac Orthop</addtitle><description>The introduction of digital X-ray techniques offered a variety of new possibilities for digital image enhancement and exposure reduction. In order to compare the reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional and digital lateral headfilms 100 digital and 100 conventional lateral headfilms of patients attending our clinic were randomly selected. The digital cephalograms were obtained using storage phosphor plates in standard X-ray cassettes. All X-rays had been taken at 77 kV. For the digital images the mAs settings for conventional images minus 4 mAs were used. Two orthodontists traced each X-ray twice (21 reference points) at an interval of at least 1 week. The tracings were superimposed and the distances between the tracings of identical reference points were registered. The average reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks was significantly higher on the digitally obtained images, despite a reduction of radiation exposure of 23.7% in the digital images.</description><subject>Cephalometry - instrumentation</subject><subject>Cephalometry - methods</subject><subject>Cephalometry - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Head - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Radiography, Dental - instrumentation</subject><subject>Radiography, Dental - methods</subject><subject>Radiography, Dental - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Radiography, Dental, Digital - instrumentation</subject><subject>Radiography, Dental, Digital - methods</subject><subject>Radiography, Dental, Digital - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><issn>1434-5293</issn><issn>1615-6714</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNUE1LAzEUDKLYWr34AyRnYTXZ7CaboxarQkEPel6yyVs3mv0wSQv996ZU0NMM7817zAxCl5TcUELE7f2KUEYIK-kRmlNOy4wLWhwnXrAiK3PJZugshE9CSFkQfopmlIiKlZzO0ferH8MEOtot4BA3ZofHAccOsIfJj2ajbWOdjWncYg1Tp9zYQ_RWY6cG0yv_FfYXehy2MEQ7DsrhtMDGftiYuFMRfMIOlGmt68M5OmmVC3Dxiwv0vnp4Wz5l65fH5-XdOtNUVjFrdUO5oYUEk5yKSuncGM40aXkjjCg1U1IwybViIEyjaNHkMldENwwqqSVboOvDX50SBg9tPXmb_O5qSup9b_Vfb0l8dRBPm6YH8096KIr9AFzeax8</recordid><startdate>2000</startdate><enddate>2000</enddate><creator>Hagemann, K</creator><creator>Vollmer, D</creator><creator>Niegel, T</creator><creator>Ehmer, U</creator><creator>Reuter, I</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2000</creationdate><title>Prospective study on the reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional and digital lateral headfilms</title><author>Hagemann, K ; Vollmer, D ; Niegel, T ; Ehmer, U ; Reuter, I</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c198t-fcb16d149ed35678ac2dd63c0f6b7d75c3a97396ca3e7dba14b292a0cb3e89c93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Cephalometry - instrumentation</topic><topic>Cephalometry - methods</topic><topic>Cephalometry - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Head - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Radiography, Dental - instrumentation</topic><topic>Radiography, Dental - methods</topic><topic>Radiography, Dental - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Radiography, Dental, Digital - instrumentation</topic><topic>Radiography, Dental, Digital - methods</topic><topic>Radiography, Dental, Digital - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hagemann, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vollmer, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niegel, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ehmer, U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reuter, I</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of orofacial orthopedics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hagemann, K</au><au>Vollmer, D</au><au>Niegel, T</au><au>Ehmer, U</au><au>Reuter, I</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prospective study on the reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional and digital lateral headfilms</atitle><jtitle>Journal of orofacial orthopedics</jtitle><addtitle>J Orofac Orthop</addtitle><date>2000</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>91</spage><epage>99</epage><pages>91-99</pages><issn>1434-5293</issn><eissn>1615-6714</eissn><abstract>The introduction of digital X-ray techniques offered a variety of new possibilities for digital image enhancement and exposure reduction. In order to compare the reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional and digital lateral headfilms 100 digital and 100 conventional lateral headfilms of patients attending our clinic were randomly selected. The digital cephalograms were obtained using storage phosphor plates in standard X-ray cassettes. All X-rays had been taken at 77 kV. For the digital images the mAs settings for conventional images minus 4 mAs were used. Two orthodontists traced each X-ray twice (21 reference points) at an interval of at least 1 week. The tracings were superimposed and the distances between the tracings of identical reference points were registered. The average reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks was significantly higher on the digitally obtained images, despite a reduction of radiation exposure of 23.7% in the digital images.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pmid>10783561</pmid><doi>10.1007/BF01300351</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1434-5293
ispartof Journal of orofacial orthopedics, 2000, Vol.61 (2), p.91-99
issn 1434-5293
1615-6714
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_BF01300351
source Springer Link
subjects Cephalometry - instrumentation
Cephalometry - methods
Cephalometry - statistics & numerical data
Head - diagnostic imaging
Humans
Observer Variation
Prospective Studies
Radiation Dosage
Radiography, Dental - instrumentation
Radiography, Dental - methods
Radiography, Dental - statistics & numerical data
Radiography, Dental, Digital - instrumentation
Radiography, Dental, Digital - methods
Radiography, Dental, Digital - statistics & numerical data
Reproducibility of Results
title Prospective study on the reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional and digital lateral headfilms
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T09%3A02%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prospective%20study%20on%20the%20reproducibility%20of%20cephalometric%20landmarks%20on%20conventional%20and%20digital%20lateral%20headfilms&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20orofacial%20orthopedics&rft.au=Hagemann,%20K&rft.date=2000&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=91&rft.epage=99&rft.pages=91-99&rft.issn=1434-5293&rft.eissn=1615-6714&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF01300351&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E10783561%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c198t-fcb16d149ed35678ac2dd63c0f6b7d75c3a97396ca3e7dba14b292a0cb3e89c93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/10783561&rfr_iscdi=true