Loading…

Can a clinician predict the technical equipment a patient will need during intensive care unit treatment ? An approach to standardize and redesign the intensive care unit workstation

The technical equipment of today's intensive care unit (ICU) workstation has been characterized by a gradual, incremental accumulation of individual devices, whose presence is dictated by patient needs. These devices usually present differently designed controls, operate under different alarm p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Clinical Monitoring 1992, Vol.8 (1), p.1-6
Main Authors: HÄHNEL, J, FRIESDORF, W, SCHWILK, B, MARX, T, BLESSING, S
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-98844eb412ab2d64b56621aaf10be7d176bb668f8deb6a3c23e08c366cc751b73
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-98844eb412ab2d64b56621aaf10be7d176bb668f8deb6a3c23e08c366cc751b73
container_end_page 6
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title Journal of Clinical Monitoring
container_volume 8
creator HÄHNEL, J
FRIESDORF, W
SCHWILK, B
MARX, T
BLESSING, S
description The technical equipment of today's intensive care unit (ICU) workstation has been characterized by a gradual, incremental accumulation of individual devices, whose presence is dictated by patient needs. These devices usually present differently designed controls, operate under different alarm philosophies, and cannot communicate with each other. By contrast, ICU workstations could be equipped permanently and in a standardized manner with electronically linked modules if the attending physicians could reliably predict, at the time of admission, the patient's equipment needs. Over a period of 3 1/2 months, the doctors working in our 20-bed surgical ICU made 1,000 predictions concerning outcome, equipment need, duration of artificial ventilation, and duration of hospitalization for 300 recently admitted patients. The interviews were made within the first 24 hours after admission. The doctors being interviewed were usually (i.e., in over 90% of cases) unfamiliar with the patient. Information concerning the patient's general state of health, special pre-ICU events, and complications was offered to the interviewed clinician because this information represents standard admission data. It was found that the equipment need (represented by two different setups, "high tech" and "low tech") could be predicted most reliably (96.4% correct predictions) compared with a prediction on outcome of ICU treatment (94.5%), on duration of artificial ventilation (75.4%), and on duration of stay (43.4%). There was no significant (p greater than 0.05) difference in the reliability of predictions between residents and consultants. Factors influencing the postoperative equipment need varied with surgical specialty.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF01618079
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_BF01618079</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72823453</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-98844eb412ab2d64b56621aaf10be7d176bb668f8deb6a3c23e08c366cc751b73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkc1u1DAUhS0EKkNhwx7JC9RFpVD_xfasUBm1gFSpG1hH185Nx5BxUtuhog_G8-F2RnTDyke-3z3H8iHkLWcfOGPm7NMl45pbZtbPyEoIrhojJXtOVswo2_C1MS_Jq5x_MMaEXYsjcsRbaYVqV-TPBiIF6scQgw9Vzwn74AstW6QF_bZew0jxdgnzDmOp7AwlPKi7MI40Iva0X1KINzTEgjGHX0g9JKRLDNUmIZTHxY_0vCbNc5rAb2mZaC4Qe0h9uEdaFa3BmMNNfIz-n9fdlH7WpRKm-Jq8GGDM-OZwHpPvlxffNl-aq-vPXzfnV42XypRmba1S6BQX4ESvlWu1Fhxg4Myh6bnRzmltB9uj0yC9kMisl1p7b1rujDwmJ3vf-uzbBXPpdiF7HEeIOC25M8IKqVpZwdM96NOUc8Khm1PYQfrdcdY9lNQ9lVThdwfXxe2wf0L3rdT5-8Mccv39IUH0If_DWsG0NEr-BRccnMs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72823453</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can a clinician predict the technical equipment a patient will need during intensive care unit treatment ? An approach to standardize and redesign the intensive care unit workstation</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>HÄHNEL, J ; FRIESDORF, W ; SCHWILK, B ; MARX, T ; BLESSING, S</creator><creatorcontrib>HÄHNEL, J ; FRIESDORF, W ; SCHWILK, B ; MARX, T ; BLESSING, S</creatorcontrib><description>The technical equipment of today's intensive care unit (ICU) workstation has been characterized by a gradual, incremental accumulation of individual devices, whose presence is dictated by patient needs. These devices usually present differently designed controls, operate under different alarm philosophies, and cannot communicate with each other. By contrast, ICU workstations could be equipped permanently and in a standardized manner with electronically linked modules if the attending physicians could reliably predict, at the time of admission, the patient's equipment needs. Over a period of 3 1/2 months, the doctors working in our 20-bed surgical ICU made 1,000 predictions concerning outcome, equipment need, duration of artificial ventilation, and duration of hospitalization for 300 recently admitted patients. The interviews were made within the first 24 hours after admission. The doctors being interviewed were usually (i.e., in over 90% of cases) unfamiliar with the patient. Information concerning the patient's general state of health, special pre-ICU events, and complications was offered to the interviewed clinician because this information represents standard admission data. It was found that the equipment need (represented by two different setups, "high tech" and "low tech") could be predicted most reliably (96.4% correct predictions) compared with a prediction on outcome of ICU treatment (94.5%), on duration of artificial ventilation (75.4%), and on duration of stay (43.4%). There was no significant (p greater than 0.05) difference in the reliability of predictions between residents and consultants. Factors influencing the postoperative equipment need varied with surgical specialty.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0748-1977</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2214-7330</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2614</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF01618079</identifier><identifier>PMID: 1538245</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCMOEH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, MA: Little</publisher><subject>Anesthesia Department, Hospital ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cardiac Surgical Procedures - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Coronary Artery Bypass - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Critical Care - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Emergency and intensive care: techniques, logistics ; Equipment Design ; Female ; Heart Valves - surgery ; Humans ; Intensive care medicine ; Intensive care unit. Emergency transport systems. Emergency, hospital ward ; Intensive Care Units - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Medical Laboratory Science - instrumentation ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Monitoring, Physiologic - instrumentation ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Probability ; Respiration, Artificial ; Sepsis ; Survival Rate ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Journal of Clinical Monitoring, 1992, Vol.8 (1), p.1-6</ispartof><rights>1992 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-98844eb412ab2d64b56621aaf10be7d176bb668f8deb6a3c23e08c366cc751b73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-98844eb412ab2d64b56621aaf10be7d176bb668f8deb6a3c23e08c366cc751b73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=5206374$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1538245$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>HÄHNEL, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FRIESDORF, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHWILK, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MARX, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BLESSING, S</creatorcontrib><title>Can a clinician predict the technical equipment a patient will need during intensive care unit treatment ? An approach to standardize and redesign the intensive care unit workstation</title><title>Journal of Clinical Monitoring</title><addtitle>J Clin Monit</addtitle><description>The technical equipment of today's intensive care unit (ICU) workstation has been characterized by a gradual, incremental accumulation of individual devices, whose presence is dictated by patient needs. These devices usually present differently designed controls, operate under different alarm philosophies, and cannot communicate with each other. By contrast, ICU workstations could be equipped permanently and in a standardized manner with electronically linked modules if the attending physicians could reliably predict, at the time of admission, the patient's equipment needs. Over a period of 3 1/2 months, the doctors working in our 20-bed surgical ICU made 1,000 predictions concerning outcome, equipment need, duration of artificial ventilation, and duration of hospitalization for 300 recently admitted patients. The interviews were made within the first 24 hours after admission. The doctors being interviewed were usually (i.e., in over 90% of cases) unfamiliar with the patient. Information concerning the patient's general state of health, special pre-ICU events, and complications was offered to the interviewed clinician because this information represents standard admission data. It was found that the equipment need (represented by two different setups, "high tech" and "low tech") could be predicted most reliably (96.4% correct predictions) compared with a prediction on outcome of ICU treatment (94.5%), on duration of artificial ventilation (75.4%), and on duration of stay (43.4%). There was no significant (p greater than 0.05) difference in the reliability of predictions between residents and consultants. Factors influencing the postoperative equipment need varied with surgical specialty.</description><subject>Anesthesia Department, Hospital</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cardiac Surgical Procedures - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Bypass - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Critical Care - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Emergency and intensive care: techniques, logistics</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart Valves - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive care medicine</subject><subject>Intensive care unit. Emergency transport systems. Emergency, hospital ward</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical Laboratory Science - instrumentation</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Monitoring, Physiologic - instrumentation</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Respiration, Artificial</subject><subject>Sepsis</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0748-1977</issn><issn>2214-7330</issn><issn>1573-2614</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkc1u1DAUhS0EKkNhwx7JC9RFpVD_xfasUBm1gFSpG1hH185Nx5BxUtuhog_G8-F2RnTDyke-3z3H8iHkLWcfOGPm7NMl45pbZtbPyEoIrhojJXtOVswo2_C1MS_Jq5x_MMaEXYsjcsRbaYVqV-TPBiIF6scQgw9Vzwn74AstW6QF_bZew0jxdgnzDmOp7AwlPKi7MI40Iva0X1KINzTEgjGHX0g9JKRLDNUmIZTHxY_0vCbNc5rAb2mZaC4Qe0h9uEdaFa3BmMNNfIz-n9fdlH7WpRKm-Jq8GGDM-OZwHpPvlxffNl-aq-vPXzfnV42XypRmba1S6BQX4ESvlWu1Fhxg4Myh6bnRzmltB9uj0yC9kMisl1p7b1rujDwmJ3vf-uzbBXPpdiF7HEeIOC25M8IKqVpZwdM96NOUc8Khm1PYQfrdcdY9lNQ9lVThdwfXxe2wf0L3rdT5-8Mccv39IUH0If_DWsG0NEr-BRccnMs</recordid><startdate>1992</startdate><enddate>1992</enddate><creator>HÄHNEL, J</creator><creator>FRIESDORF, W</creator><creator>SCHWILK, B</creator><creator>MARX, T</creator><creator>BLESSING, S</creator><general>Little</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1992</creationdate><title>Can a clinician predict the technical equipment a patient will need during intensive care unit treatment ? An approach to standardize and redesign the intensive care unit workstation</title><author>HÄHNEL, J ; FRIESDORF, W ; SCHWILK, B ; MARX, T ; BLESSING, S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-98844eb412ab2d64b56621aaf10be7d176bb668f8deb6a3c23e08c366cc751b73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>Anesthesia Department, Hospital</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cardiac Surgical Procedures - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Bypass - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Critical Care - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Emergency and intensive care: techniques, logistics</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart Valves - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive care medicine</topic><topic>Intensive care unit. Emergency transport systems. Emergency, hospital ward</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical Laboratory Science - instrumentation</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Monitoring, Physiologic - instrumentation</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Respiration, Artificial</topic><topic>Sepsis</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>HÄHNEL, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FRIESDORF, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHWILK, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MARX, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BLESSING, S</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of Clinical Monitoring</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>HÄHNEL, J</au><au>FRIESDORF, W</au><au>SCHWILK, B</au><au>MARX, T</au><au>BLESSING, S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can a clinician predict the technical equipment a patient will need during intensive care unit treatment ? An approach to standardize and redesign the intensive care unit workstation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Clinical Monitoring</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Monit</addtitle><date>1992</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>6</epage><pages>1-6</pages><issn>0748-1977</issn><eissn>2214-7330</eissn><eissn>1573-2614</eissn><coden>JCMOEH</coden><abstract>The technical equipment of today's intensive care unit (ICU) workstation has been characterized by a gradual, incremental accumulation of individual devices, whose presence is dictated by patient needs. These devices usually present differently designed controls, operate under different alarm philosophies, and cannot communicate with each other. By contrast, ICU workstations could be equipped permanently and in a standardized manner with electronically linked modules if the attending physicians could reliably predict, at the time of admission, the patient's equipment needs. Over a period of 3 1/2 months, the doctors working in our 20-bed surgical ICU made 1,000 predictions concerning outcome, equipment need, duration of artificial ventilation, and duration of hospitalization for 300 recently admitted patients. The interviews were made within the first 24 hours after admission. The doctors being interviewed were usually (i.e., in over 90% of cases) unfamiliar with the patient. Information concerning the patient's general state of health, special pre-ICU events, and complications was offered to the interviewed clinician because this information represents standard admission data. It was found that the equipment need (represented by two different setups, "high tech" and "low tech") could be predicted most reliably (96.4% correct predictions) compared with a prediction on outcome of ICU treatment (94.5%), on duration of artificial ventilation (75.4%), and on duration of stay (43.4%). There was no significant (p greater than 0.05) difference in the reliability of predictions between residents and consultants. Factors influencing the postoperative equipment need varied with surgical specialty.</abstract><cop>Boston, MA</cop><pub>Little</pub><pmid>1538245</pmid><doi>10.1007/BF01618079</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0748-1977
ispartof Journal of Clinical Monitoring, 1992, Vol.8 (1), p.1-6
issn 0748-1977
2214-7330
1573-2614
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_BF01618079
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Anesthesia Department, Hospital
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Biological and medical sciences
Cardiac Surgical Procedures - statistics & numerical data
Coronary Artery Bypass - statistics & numerical data
Critical Care - statistics & numerical data
Emergency and intensive care: techniques, logistics
Equipment Design
Female
Heart Valves - surgery
Humans
Intensive care medicine
Intensive care unit. Emergency transport systems. Emergency, hospital ward
Intensive Care Units - statistics & numerical data
Length of Stay
Male
Medical Laboratory Science - instrumentation
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Monitoring, Physiologic - instrumentation
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Probability
Respiration, Artificial
Sepsis
Survival Rate
Time Factors
title Can a clinician predict the technical equipment a patient will need during intensive care unit treatment ? An approach to standardize and redesign the intensive care unit workstation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T03%3A00%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20a%20clinician%20predict%20the%20technical%20equipment%20a%20patient%20will%20need%20during%20intensive%20care%20unit%20treatment%20?%20An%20approach%20to%20standardize%20and%20redesign%20the%20intensive%20care%20unit%20workstation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Clinical%20Monitoring&rft.au=H%C3%84HNEL,%20J&rft.date=1992&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=6&rft.pages=1-6&rft.issn=0748-1977&rft.eissn=2214-7330&rft.coden=JCMOEH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF01618079&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72823453%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-98844eb412ab2d64b56621aaf10be7d176bb668f8deb6a3c23e08c366cc751b73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72823453&rft_id=info:pmid/1538245&rfr_iscdi=true