Loading…
Unilateral or bilateral freestyle infra-orbital perforator flap in reconstruction of external soft tissue nasal defects
Background Nasal reconstruction is one of the most challenging procedures for plastic surgeons, and whether it should be performed using the subunit principle versus the defect-only principle remains a matter of debate. Skin grafting and local flaps such as dorsal nasal, bi-lobed, V-Y advancement, g...
Saved in:
Published in: | European journal of plastic surgery 2021-04, Vol.44 (2), p.203-210 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-bce3d6ff4e79b45b97a2655708b4195c95eb3b2fff4473f5fa8486681ae3d7753 |
container_end_page | 210 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 203 |
container_title | European journal of plastic surgery |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Elmelegy, Nader Alsharkawy, Kareem Khedr, Mohamed M. Elhawary, Yasser |
description | Background
Nasal reconstruction is one of the most challenging procedures for plastic surgeons, and whether it should be performed using the subunit principle versus the defect-only principle remains a matter of debate. Skin grafting and local flaps such as dorsal nasal, bi-lobed, V-Y advancement, glabellar, nasolabial, forehead, and para-median forehead flaps have been used in nasal reconstruction. Another style of flap that has also been used for nasal reconstruction is the perforator flap. In this work, we will evaluate the utility of unilateral or bilateral freestyle infra-orbital perforator flaps in the reconstruction of nasal skin defects.
Methods
This prospective clinical study was conducted in the plastic surgery department of Tanta University Hospital, Egypt, between February 2015 and April 2019. A total of 34 patients who presented with nasal skin tumours that did not invade the nasal bones or cartilage were ultimately enrolled in the study.
Results
The age of the patients ranged from 43 to 78 years, with a mean of 53 years. Clinical assessment was performed by three plastic surgeons who did not share in this study using a four-point scale. The assessment indicated excellent results in 22 (64.7%) patients, good results in 7 (20.6%) patients, fair results in 5 (14.7%) patients, and no poor results. No significant complications were observed in our experience.
Conclusions
We believe that unilateral and bilateral infra-orbital perforator flaps may provide an alternative reconstruction method for different nasal defects.
Level of Evidence: Level IV; therapeutic study. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00238-020-01723-y |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref_sprin</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_s00238_020_01723_y</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1007_s00238_020_01723_y</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-bce3d6ff4e79b45b97a2655708b4195c95eb3b2fff4473f5fa8486681ae3d7753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYMouK5-AU_5AtFJkzTtURb_wYIXF7yFpDuRLrVZkhTttzfrikdPw5t578H8CLnmcMMB9G0CqETDoAIGXFeCzSdkwaVQRQo4JQtoBTAhxds5uUhpB8BVC3JBPjdjP9iM0Q40ROr-hI-IKc8D0n700bIQXZ_Lfo_Rh2hzMfvB7suVRuzCmHKcutyHkQZP8auUjMWdgs809ylNSEebymaLHrucLsmZt0PCq9-5JJuH-9fVE1u_PD6v7tasq5o6M9eh2NbeS9Stk8q12la1UhoaJ3mrulahE67yxSG18MrbRjZ13XBbclorsSTVsbeLIaWI3uxj_2HjbDiYAzpzRGcKOvODzswlJI6hVMzjO0azC9Phn_Rf6htkT3Xm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Unilateral or bilateral freestyle infra-orbital perforator flap in reconstruction of external soft tissue nasal defects</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Elmelegy, Nader ; Alsharkawy, Kareem ; Khedr, Mohamed M. ; Elhawary, Yasser</creator><creatorcontrib>Elmelegy, Nader ; Alsharkawy, Kareem ; Khedr, Mohamed M. ; Elhawary, Yasser</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Nasal reconstruction is one of the most challenging procedures for plastic surgeons, and whether it should be performed using the subunit principle versus the defect-only principle remains a matter of debate. Skin grafting and local flaps such as dorsal nasal, bi-lobed, V-Y advancement, glabellar, nasolabial, forehead, and para-median forehead flaps have been used in nasal reconstruction. Another style of flap that has also been used for nasal reconstruction is the perforator flap. In this work, we will evaluate the utility of unilateral or bilateral freestyle infra-orbital perforator flaps in the reconstruction of nasal skin defects.
Methods
This prospective clinical study was conducted in the plastic surgery department of Tanta University Hospital, Egypt, between February 2015 and April 2019. A total of 34 patients who presented with nasal skin tumours that did not invade the nasal bones or cartilage were ultimately enrolled in the study.
Results
The age of the patients ranged from 43 to 78 years, with a mean of 53 years. Clinical assessment was performed by three plastic surgeons who did not share in this study using a four-point scale. The assessment indicated excellent results in 22 (64.7%) patients, good results in 7 (20.6%) patients, fair results in 5 (14.7%) patients, and no poor results. No significant complications were observed in our experience.
Conclusions
We believe that unilateral and bilateral infra-orbital perforator flaps may provide an alternative reconstruction method for different nasal defects.
Level of Evidence: Level IV; therapeutic study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0930-343X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0130</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00238-020-01723-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Original Paper ; Plastic Surgery</subject><ispartof>European journal of plastic surgery, 2021-04, Vol.44 (2), p.203-210</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-bce3d6ff4e79b45b97a2655708b4195c95eb3b2fff4473f5fa8486681ae3d7753</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Elmelegy, Nader</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alsharkawy, Kareem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khedr, Mohamed M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elhawary, Yasser</creatorcontrib><title>Unilateral or bilateral freestyle infra-orbital perforator flap in reconstruction of external soft tissue nasal defects</title><title>European journal of plastic surgery</title><addtitle>Eur J Plast Surg</addtitle><description>Background
Nasal reconstruction is one of the most challenging procedures for plastic surgeons, and whether it should be performed using the subunit principle versus the defect-only principle remains a matter of debate. Skin grafting and local flaps such as dorsal nasal, bi-lobed, V-Y advancement, glabellar, nasolabial, forehead, and para-median forehead flaps have been used in nasal reconstruction. Another style of flap that has also been used for nasal reconstruction is the perforator flap. In this work, we will evaluate the utility of unilateral or bilateral freestyle infra-orbital perforator flaps in the reconstruction of nasal skin defects.
Methods
This prospective clinical study was conducted in the plastic surgery department of Tanta University Hospital, Egypt, between February 2015 and April 2019. A total of 34 patients who presented with nasal skin tumours that did not invade the nasal bones or cartilage were ultimately enrolled in the study.
Results
The age of the patients ranged from 43 to 78 years, with a mean of 53 years. Clinical assessment was performed by three plastic surgeons who did not share in this study using a four-point scale. The assessment indicated excellent results in 22 (64.7%) patients, good results in 7 (20.6%) patients, fair results in 5 (14.7%) patients, and no poor results. No significant complications were observed in our experience.
Conclusions
We believe that unilateral and bilateral infra-orbital perforator flaps may provide an alternative reconstruction method for different nasal defects.
Level of Evidence: Level IV; therapeutic study.</description><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Plastic Surgery</subject><issn>0930-343X</issn><issn>1435-0130</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYMouK5-AU_5AtFJkzTtURb_wYIXF7yFpDuRLrVZkhTttzfrikdPw5t578H8CLnmcMMB9G0CqETDoAIGXFeCzSdkwaVQRQo4JQtoBTAhxds5uUhpB8BVC3JBPjdjP9iM0Q40ROr-hI-IKc8D0n700bIQXZ_Lfo_Rh2hzMfvB7suVRuzCmHKcutyHkQZP8auUjMWdgs809ylNSEebymaLHrucLsmZt0PCq9-5JJuH-9fVE1u_PD6v7tasq5o6M9eh2NbeS9Stk8q12la1UhoaJ3mrulahE67yxSG18MrbRjZ13XBbclorsSTVsbeLIaWI3uxj_2HjbDiYAzpzRGcKOvODzswlJI6hVMzjO0azC9Phn_Rf6htkT3Xm</recordid><startdate>20210401</startdate><enddate>20210401</enddate><creator>Elmelegy, Nader</creator><creator>Alsharkawy, Kareem</creator><creator>Khedr, Mohamed M.</creator><creator>Elhawary, Yasser</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210401</creationdate><title>Unilateral or bilateral freestyle infra-orbital perforator flap in reconstruction of external soft tissue nasal defects</title><author>Elmelegy, Nader ; Alsharkawy, Kareem ; Khedr, Mohamed M. ; Elhawary, Yasser</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-bce3d6ff4e79b45b97a2655708b4195c95eb3b2fff4473f5fa8486681ae3d7753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Plastic Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Elmelegy, Nader</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alsharkawy, Kareem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khedr, Mohamed M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elhawary, Yasser</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>European journal of plastic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Elmelegy, Nader</au><au>Alsharkawy, Kareem</au><au>Khedr, Mohamed M.</au><au>Elhawary, Yasser</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Unilateral or bilateral freestyle infra-orbital perforator flap in reconstruction of external soft tissue nasal defects</atitle><jtitle>European journal of plastic surgery</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Plast Surg</stitle><date>2021-04-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>203</spage><epage>210</epage><pages>203-210</pages><issn>0930-343X</issn><eissn>1435-0130</eissn><abstract>Background
Nasal reconstruction is one of the most challenging procedures for plastic surgeons, and whether it should be performed using the subunit principle versus the defect-only principle remains a matter of debate. Skin grafting and local flaps such as dorsal nasal, bi-lobed, V-Y advancement, glabellar, nasolabial, forehead, and para-median forehead flaps have been used in nasal reconstruction. Another style of flap that has also been used for nasal reconstruction is the perforator flap. In this work, we will evaluate the utility of unilateral or bilateral freestyle infra-orbital perforator flaps in the reconstruction of nasal skin defects.
Methods
This prospective clinical study was conducted in the plastic surgery department of Tanta University Hospital, Egypt, between February 2015 and April 2019. A total of 34 patients who presented with nasal skin tumours that did not invade the nasal bones or cartilage were ultimately enrolled in the study.
Results
The age of the patients ranged from 43 to 78 years, with a mean of 53 years. Clinical assessment was performed by three plastic surgeons who did not share in this study using a four-point scale. The assessment indicated excellent results in 22 (64.7%) patients, good results in 7 (20.6%) patients, fair results in 5 (14.7%) patients, and no poor results. No significant complications were observed in our experience.
Conclusions
We believe that unilateral and bilateral infra-orbital perforator flaps may provide an alternative reconstruction method for different nasal defects.
Level of Evidence: Level IV; therapeutic study.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00238-020-01723-y</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0930-343X |
ispartof | European journal of plastic surgery, 2021-04, Vol.44 (2), p.203-210 |
issn | 0930-343X 1435-0130 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_s00238_020_01723_y |
source | Springer Link |
subjects | Medicine Medicine & Public Health Original Paper Plastic Surgery |
title | Unilateral or bilateral freestyle infra-orbital perforator flap in reconstruction of external soft tissue nasal defects |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T12%3A41%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref_sprin&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Unilateral%20or%20bilateral%20freestyle%20infra-orbital%20perforator%20flap%20in%20reconstruction%20of%20external%20soft%20tissue%20nasal%20defects&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20plastic%20surgery&rft.au=Elmelegy,%20Nader&rft.date=2021-04-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=203&rft.epage=210&rft.pages=203-210&rft.issn=0930-343X&rft.eissn=1435-0130&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00238-020-01723-y&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref_sprin%3E10_1007_s00238_020_01723_y%3C/crossref_sprin%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-bce3d6ff4e79b45b97a2655708b4195c95eb3b2fff4473f5fa8486681ae3d7753%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |