Prevalence of irritative symptoms in a nonproblem air-conditioned office building

• Published in: International archives of occupational and environmental health 1998-09, Vol.71 (6), p.372-378
• Main Authors: Muzi, G, Abbritti, G, Accattoli, M P, dell'Omo, M
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Air Conditioning - adverse effects; Case-Control Studies; Climate; Female; Humans; Italy; Logistic Models; Male; Prevalence; Risk Factors; Sick Building Syndrome - etiology; Surveys and Questionnaires
• ISSN: 0340-0131; 1432-1246
• DOI: 10.1007/s004200050295

To assess the prevalence of work-related complaints and symptoms in employees in an air-conditioned office building (Building AC) in a mild climatic area (Italy). No discomfort had previously been reported. A total of 198 employees in Building AC and 281 controls working in three naturally ventilated buildings (Building NV) answered a questionnaire investigating work-related complaints and symptoms. A significantly higher percentage of workers in Building AC reported a lack of comfort in the working environment as compared with the controls (30.6% versus 18.9%). The most common complaints were strong lighting, high temperature, and dry, dusty, and/or stuffy air. The prevalence of ocular, upper airway, and cutaneous symptoms was significantly higher (29.8% versus 14.9%, 25.3% versus 9.6%, and 14.1% versus 3.6%, respectively). No significant difference was observed in respiratory or general symptoms. Logistic regression analysis showed that working with video display units and photocopiers influenced ocular symptoms; upper airway and cutaneous symptoms were influenced by female gender and working in the air-conditioned building. In an apparently healthy air-conditioned office building, complaints and symptoms are reported more often than in a naturally ventilated edifice, but the prevalence is lower than that usually observed in sick buildings. Symptoms are influenced by individual and work-related characteristics.