Loading…
Periocular recognition: how much facial expressions affect performance?
Using information near the human eye to perform biometric recognition has been gaining popularity. Previous works in this area, designated periocular recognition , show remarkably low error rates and particularly high robustness when data are acquired under less controlled conditions. In this field,...
Saved in:
Published in: | Pattern analysis and applications : PAA 2016-05, Vol.19 (2), p.517-530 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Using information near the human eye to perform biometric recognition has been gaining popularity. Previous works in this area, designated
periocular recognition
, show remarkably low error rates and particularly high robustness when data are acquired under less controlled conditions. In this field, one factor that remains to be studied is the effect of facial expressions on recognition performance, as expressions change the textural/shape information inside the periocular region. We have collected a multisession dataset whose single variation is the subjects’ facial expressions and analyzed the corresponding variations in performance, using the state-of-the-art periocular recognition strategy. The effectiveness attained by different strategies to handle the effects of facial expressions was compared: (1) single-sample enrollment; (2) multisample enrollment, and (3) multisample enrollment with facial expression recognition, with results also validated in the well-known
Cohn–Kanade AU-Coded Expression
dataset. Finally, the role of each type of facial expression in the
biometrics menagerie
effect is discussed. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1433-7541 1433-755X |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10044-015-0493-z |