Loading…

Comparison of wrist motion classification methods using surface electromyogram

The Gaussian mixture model (GMM), k -nearest neighbor ( k -NN), quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA), and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) were compared to classify wrist motions using surface electromyogram (EMG). Effect of feature selection in EMG signal processing was also verified by comparin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Central South University 2013-04, Vol.20 (4), p.960-968
Main Authors: Jeong, Eui-chul, Kim, Seo-jun, Song, Young-rok, Lee, Sang-min
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-3bfa347e913c511c1df43acb72b331f50f1487640d7f816a093eb6e5fc9f29fa3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-3bfa347e913c511c1df43acb72b331f50f1487640d7f816a093eb6e5fc9f29fa3
container_end_page 968
container_issue 4
container_start_page 960
container_title Journal of Central South University
container_volume 20
creator Jeong, Eui-chul
Kim, Seo-jun
Song, Young-rok
Lee, Sang-min
description The Gaussian mixture model (GMM), k -nearest neighbor ( k -NN), quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA), and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) were compared to classify wrist motions using surface electromyogram (EMG). Effect of feature selection in EMG signal processing was also verified by comparing classification accuracy of each feature, and the enhancement of classification accuracy by normalization was confirmed. EMG signals were acquired from two electrodes placed on the forearm of twenty eight healthy subjects and used for recognition of wrist motion. Features were extracted from the obtained EMG signals in the time domain and were applied to classification methods. The difference absolute mean value (DAMV), difference absolute standard deviation value (DASDV), mean absolute value (MAV), root mean square (RMS) were used for composing 16 double features which were combined of two channels. In the classification methods, the highest accuracy of classification showed in the GMM. The most effective combination of classification method and double feature was (MAV, DAMV) of GMM and its classification accuracy was 96.85%. The results of normalization were better than those of non-normalization in GMM, k -NN, and LDA.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11771-013-1571-2
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref_sprin</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_s11771_013_1571_2</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1007_s11771_013_1571_2</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-3bfa347e913c511c1df43acb72b331f50f1487640d7f816a093eb6e5fc9f29fa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouKz7A7z1D0Qzk7ZpjlL8gkUveg5pmtRK2yxJi-y_N2s972negfcZhoeQW2B3wJi4jwBCAGXAKRQp4AXZIKKgBSK_TJnJgmIl5TXZxdg3jAOWvJTlhrzVfjzo0Ec_Zd5lPynN2ejnPu1m0KnteqP_1tHOX76N2RL7qcviEpw2NrODNXPw49F3QY835MrpIdrd_9ySz6fHj_qF7t-fX-uHPTUc85nyxmmeCyuBmwLAQOtyrk0jsOEcXMEc5JUoc9YKV0GpmeS2KW3hjHQoE7slsN41wccYrFOH0I86HBUwdXKiVicqOVEnJwoTgysTU3fqbFDffglTevMM9Asxf2YL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of wrist motion classification methods using surface electromyogram</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Jeong, Eui-chul ; Kim, Seo-jun ; Song, Young-rok ; Lee, Sang-min</creator><creatorcontrib>Jeong, Eui-chul ; Kim, Seo-jun ; Song, Young-rok ; Lee, Sang-min</creatorcontrib><description>The Gaussian mixture model (GMM), k -nearest neighbor ( k -NN), quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA), and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) were compared to classify wrist motions using surface electromyogram (EMG). Effect of feature selection in EMG signal processing was also verified by comparing classification accuracy of each feature, and the enhancement of classification accuracy by normalization was confirmed. EMG signals were acquired from two electrodes placed on the forearm of twenty eight healthy subjects and used for recognition of wrist motion. Features were extracted from the obtained EMG signals in the time domain and were applied to classification methods. The difference absolute mean value (DAMV), difference absolute standard deviation value (DASDV), mean absolute value (MAV), root mean square (RMS) were used for composing 16 double features which were combined of two channels. In the classification methods, the highest accuracy of classification showed in the GMM. The most effective combination of classification method and double feature was (MAV, DAMV) of GMM and its classification accuracy was 96.85%. The results of normalization were better than those of non-normalization in GMM, k -NN, and LDA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2095-2899</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2227-5223</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11771-013-1571-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Central South University</publisher><subject>Engineering ; Metallic Materials</subject><ispartof>Journal of Central South University, 2013-04, Vol.20 (4), p.960-968</ispartof><rights>Central South University Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-3bfa347e913c511c1df43acb72b331f50f1487640d7f816a093eb6e5fc9f29fa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-3bfa347e913c511c1df43acb72b331f50f1487640d7f816a093eb6e5fc9f29fa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jeong, Eui-chul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Seo-jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Young-rok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sang-min</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of wrist motion classification methods using surface electromyogram</title><title>Journal of Central South University</title><addtitle>J. Cent. South Univ</addtitle><description>The Gaussian mixture model (GMM), k -nearest neighbor ( k -NN), quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA), and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) were compared to classify wrist motions using surface electromyogram (EMG). Effect of feature selection in EMG signal processing was also verified by comparing classification accuracy of each feature, and the enhancement of classification accuracy by normalization was confirmed. EMG signals were acquired from two electrodes placed on the forearm of twenty eight healthy subjects and used for recognition of wrist motion. Features were extracted from the obtained EMG signals in the time domain and were applied to classification methods. The difference absolute mean value (DAMV), difference absolute standard deviation value (DASDV), mean absolute value (MAV), root mean square (RMS) were used for composing 16 double features which were combined of two channels. In the classification methods, the highest accuracy of classification showed in the GMM. The most effective combination of classification method and double feature was (MAV, DAMV) of GMM and its classification accuracy was 96.85%. The results of normalization were better than those of non-normalization in GMM, k -NN, and LDA.</description><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Metallic Materials</subject><issn>2095-2899</issn><issn>2227-5223</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouKz7A7z1D0Qzk7ZpjlL8gkUveg5pmtRK2yxJi-y_N2s972negfcZhoeQW2B3wJi4jwBCAGXAKRQp4AXZIKKgBSK_TJnJgmIl5TXZxdg3jAOWvJTlhrzVfjzo0Ec_Zd5lPynN2ejnPu1m0KnteqP_1tHOX76N2RL7qcviEpw2NrODNXPw49F3QY835MrpIdrd_9ySz6fHj_qF7t-fX-uHPTUc85nyxmmeCyuBmwLAQOtyrk0jsOEcXMEc5JUoc9YKV0GpmeS2KW3hjHQoE7slsN41wccYrFOH0I86HBUwdXKiVicqOVEnJwoTgysTU3fqbFDffglTevMM9Asxf2YL</recordid><startdate>20130401</startdate><enddate>20130401</enddate><creator>Jeong, Eui-chul</creator><creator>Kim, Seo-jun</creator><creator>Song, Young-rok</creator><creator>Lee, Sang-min</creator><general>Central South University</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130401</creationdate><title>Comparison of wrist motion classification methods using surface electromyogram</title><author>Jeong, Eui-chul ; Kim, Seo-jun ; Song, Young-rok ; Lee, Sang-min</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-3bfa347e913c511c1df43acb72b331f50f1487640d7f816a093eb6e5fc9f29fa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Metallic Materials</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jeong, Eui-chul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Seo-jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Young-rok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sang-min</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of Central South University</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jeong, Eui-chul</au><au>Kim, Seo-jun</au><au>Song, Young-rok</au><au>Lee, Sang-min</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of wrist motion classification methods using surface electromyogram</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Central South University</jtitle><stitle>J. Cent. South Univ</stitle><date>2013-04-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>960</spage><epage>968</epage><pages>960-968</pages><issn>2095-2899</issn><eissn>2227-5223</eissn><abstract>The Gaussian mixture model (GMM), k -nearest neighbor ( k -NN), quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA), and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) were compared to classify wrist motions using surface electromyogram (EMG). Effect of feature selection in EMG signal processing was also verified by comparing classification accuracy of each feature, and the enhancement of classification accuracy by normalization was confirmed. EMG signals were acquired from two electrodes placed on the forearm of twenty eight healthy subjects and used for recognition of wrist motion. Features were extracted from the obtained EMG signals in the time domain and were applied to classification methods. The difference absolute mean value (DAMV), difference absolute standard deviation value (DASDV), mean absolute value (MAV), root mean square (RMS) were used for composing 16 double features which were combined of two channels. In the classification methods, the highest accuracy of classification showed in the GMM. The most effective combination of classification method and double feature was (MAV, DAMV) of GMM and its classification accuracy was 96.85%. The results of normalization were better than those of non-normalization in GMM, k -NN, and LDA.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Central South University</pub><doi>10.1007/s11771-013-1571-2</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2095-2899
ispartof Journal of Central South University, 2013-04, Vol.20 (4), p.960-968
issn 2095-2899
2227-5223
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_s11771_013_1571_2
source Springer Nature
subjects Engineering
Metallic Materials
title Comparison of wrist motion classification methods using surface electromyogram
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T17%3A30%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref_sprin&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20wrist%20motion%20classification%20methods%20using%20surface%20electromyogram&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Central%20South%20University&rft.au=Jeong,%20Eui-chul&rft.date=2013-04-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=960&rft.epage=968&rft.pages=960-968&rft.issn=2095-2899&rft.eissn=2227-5223&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11771-013-1571-2&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref_sprin%3E10_1007_s11771_013_1571_2%3C/crossref_sprin%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-3bfa347e913c511c1df43acb72b331f50f1487640d7f816a093eb6e5fc9f29fa3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true