Loading…

Energetic, economic, and environmental analysis of CO2 booster refrigeration systems of supermarket application for Türkiye

Refrigeration systems account for nearly half of the electricity consumed by supermarkets. In order to save energy and reduce CO 2 emissions, CO 2 booster refrigeration systems have been developed. This paper discusses three of them due to their high energy efficiency, economic feasibility, and envi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sadhana (Bangalore) 2023-11, Vol.48 (4), Article 275
Main Authors: Isik, Metehan, Bilir Sag, Nagihan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Refrigeration systems account for nearly half of the electricity consumed by supermarkets. In order to save energy and reduce CO 2 emissions, CO 2 booster refrigeration systems have been developed. This paper discusses three of them due to their high energy efficiency, economic feasibility, and environmental friendliness for supermarkets of Türkiye for the first time in the literature. These systems are the standard CO 2 booster system (BRC), the CO 2 booster refrigeration system with the flooded evaporators (BRC-FE), and the CO 2 booster refrigeration system with the flooded evaporators and parallel compressor (BRC-FE-PAR). Power consumption values, coefficient of performance (COP) values, annual energy consumptions (AEC), installation and operating costs, and CO 2 emissions of the systems are calculated and compared with the reference R404A refrigeration system (Reference System) under different climatic conditions. The highest COP values are obtained for BRC-FE-PAR under 30°C ambient temperatures. Above this temperature, the Reference system has the highest COP. The BRC has the highest AEC, while the BRC-FE-PAR has the lowest among CO 2 booster systems. The BRC-FE-PAR is the cycle with the highest saving (2.2%-19.4%) as compared to the Reference System in all cities considered. The investigated CO 2 booster systems have lower emission values between 23.4% and 52.2% than the Reference System.
ISSN:0973-7677
0973-7677
DOI:10.1007/s12046-023-02337-3