Loading…
18F-FDG uptake by rectal cancer is similar in mucinous and nonmucinous histological subtypes
Purpose PET/CT has been considered limited for the evaluation of mucinous colorectal tumors due to low 18 F-FDG uptake. The aim of our study was to compare PET/CT variables in mucinous (MC) and nonmucinous (NMC) rectal adenocarcinomas. Methods Consecutive patients with cT2-4N0-2M0 rectal cancer incl...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Annals of nuclear medicine 2016-10, Vol.30 (8), p.513-517 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c242t-45f790cd131668c5ac95ea25f8d7372c00157285cbb4ca2e07103e96a19a40aa3 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c242t-45f790cd131668c5ac95ea25f8d7372c00157285cbb4ca2e07103e96a19a40aa3 |
| container_end_page | 517 |
| container_issue | 8 |
| container_start_page | 513 |
| container_title | Annals of nuclear medicine |
| container_volume | 30 |
| creator | dos Anjos, Dalton A. Habr-Gama, Angelita Vailati, Bruna B. Rossi, Cecilia B. Coturel, Adelina E. Perez, Rodrigo O. São Julião, Guilherme P. de Sousa, João B. Buchpiguel, Carlos A. |
| description | Purpose
PET/CT has been considered limited for the evaluation of mucinous colorectal tumors due to low
18
F-FDG uptake. The aim of our study was to compare PET/CT variables in mucinous (MC) and nonmucinous (NMC) rectal adenocarcinomas.
Methods
Consecutive patients with cT2-4N0-2M0 rectal cancer included in a prospective clinical trial were reviewed. PET/CT was performed for primary baseline staging. Visual and quantitative analysis included SUVmax and SUVmean, metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). PET/CT parameters were compared according to histological subtypes.
Results
Overall, 73 patients were included (18 mucinous and 55 nonmucinous). SUVmax values were similar between MC and NMC (19.7 vs. 16.6;
p
= 0.5). MTV and TLG values were greater in the MC group (103.9 vs. 54.1;
p
= 0.007 and 892.5 vs. 358.8;
p
= 0.020) due to larger tumor volumes of MC.
Conclusions
Metabolic parameters at baseline PET/CT for patients with rectal cancer are similar in mucinous and nonmucinous histological subtypes. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12149-016-1089-4 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref_sprin</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_s12149_016_1089_4</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1007_s12149_016_1089_4</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c242t-45f790cd131668c5ac95ea25f8d7372c00157285cbb4ca2e07103e96a19a40aa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFKAzEQhoMoWKsP4C0vEJ3JZjfJUapVoeBFb0LIptmaus2WZPfQtzel4tHTzMD_DT8fIbcIdwgg7zNyFJoBNgxBaSbOyAxVI1gjquqczECjYBKVvCRXOW8BuKoVn5FPVEu2fHym03603562B5q8G21PnY3OJxoyzWEXelvWSHeTC3GYMrVxTeMQ_-6vkMehHzbBFTRP7XjY-3xNLjrbZ3_zO-fkY_n0vnhhq7fn18XDijku-MhE3UkNbo0VNo1ytXW69pbXnVrLSnIHgLUsfV3bCme5B4lQed1Y1FaAtdWc4OmvS0POyXdmn8LOpoNBMEc95qTHFD3mqMeIwvATk0s2bnwy22FKsdT8B_oBr0hoUg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>18F-FDG uptake by rectal cancer is similar in mucinous and nonmucinous histological subtypes</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>dos Anjos, Dalton A. ; Habr-Gama, Angelita ; Vailati, Bruna B. ; Rossi, Cecilia B. ; Coturel, Adelina E. ; Perez, Rodrigo O. ; São Julião, Guilherme P. ; de Sousa, João B. ; Buchpiguel, Carlos A.</creator><creatorcontrib>dos Anjos, Dalton A. ; Habr-Gama, Angelita ; Vailati, Bruna B. ; Rossi, Cecilia B. ; Coturel, Adelina E. ; Perez, Rodrigo O. ; São Julião, Guilherme P. ; de Sousa, João B. ; Buchpiguel, Carlos A.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
PET/CT has been considered limited for the evaluation of mucinous colorectal tumors due to low
18
F-FDG uptake. The aim of our study was to compare PET/CT variables in mucinous (MC) and nonmucinous (NMC) rectal adenocarcinomas.
Methods
Consecutive patients with cT2-4N0-2M0 rectal cancer included in a prospective clinical trial were reviewed. PET/CT was performed for primary baseline staging. Visual and quantitative analysis included SUVmax and SUVmean, metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). PET/CT parameters were compared according to histological subtypes.
Results
Overall, 73 patients were included (18 mucinous and 55 nonmucinous). SUVmax values were similar between MC and NMC (19.7 vs. 16.6;
p
= 0.5). MTV and TLG values were greater in the MC group (103.9 vs. 54.1;
p
= 0.007 and 892.5 vs. 358.8;
p
= 0.020) due to larger tumor volumes of MC.
Conclusions
Metabolic parameters at baseline PET/CT for patients with rectal cancer are similar in mucinous and nonmucinous histological subtypes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0914-7187</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1864-6433</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12149-016-1089-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Tokyo: Springer Japan</publisher><subject>Imaging ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Nuclear Medicine ; Original Article ; Radiology</subject><ispartof>Annals of nuclear medicine, 2016-10, Vol.30 (8), p.513-517</ispartof><rights>The Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c242t-45f790cd131668c5ac95ea25f8d7372c00157285cbb4ca2e07103e96a19a40aa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c242t-45f790cd131668c5ac95ea25f8d7372c00157285cbb4ca2e07103e96a19a40aa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>dos Anjos, Dalton A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Habr-Gama, Angelita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vailati, Bruna B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossi, Cecilia B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coturel, Adelina E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perez, Rodrigo O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>São Julião, Guilherme P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Sousa, João B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchpiguel, Carlos A.</creatorcontrib><title>18F-FDG uptake by rectal cancer is similar in mucinous and nonmucinous histological subtypes</title><title>Annals of nuclear medicine</title><addtitle>Ann Nucl Med</addtitle><description>Purpose
PET/CT has been considered limited for the evaluation of mucinous colorectal tumors due to low
18
F-FDG uptake. The aim of our study was to compare PET/CT variables in mucinous (MC) and nonmucinous (NMC) rectal adenocarcinomas.
Methods
Consecutive patients with cT2-4N0-2M0 rectal cancer included in a prospective clinical trial were reviewed. PET/CT was performed for primary baseline staging. Visual and quantitative analysis included SUVmax and SUVmean, metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). PET/CT parameters were compared according to histological subtypes.
Results
Overall, 73 patients were included (18 mucinous and 55 nonmucinous). SUVmax values were similar between MC and NMC (19.7 vs. 16.6;
p
= 0.5). MTV and TLG values were greater in the MC group (103.9 vs. 54.1;
p
= 0.007 and 892.5 vs. 358.8;
p
= 0.020) due to larger tumor volumes of MC.
Conclusions
Metabolic parameters at baseline PET/CT for patients with rectal cancer are similar in mucinous and nonmucinous histological subtypes.</description><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Nuclear Medicine</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><issn>0914-7187</issn><issn>1864-6433</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFKAzEQhoMoWKsP4C0vEJ3JZjfJUapVoeBFb0LIptmaus2WZPfQtzel4tHTzMD_DT8fIbcIdwgg7zNyFJoBNgxBaSbOyAxVI1gjquqczECjYBKVvCRXOW8BuKoVn5FPVEu2fHym03603562B5q8G21PnY3OJxoyzWEXelvWSHeTC3GYMrVxTeMQ_-6vkMehHzbBFTRP7XjY-3xNLjrbZ3_zO-fkY_n0vnhhq7fn18XDijku-MhE3UkNbo0VNo1ytXW69pbXnVrLSnIHgLUsfV3bCme5B4lQed1Y1FaAtdWc4OmvS0POyXdmn8LOpoNBMEc95qTHFD3mqMeIwvATk0s2bnwy22FKsdT8B_oBr0hoUg</recordid><startdate>20161001</startdate><enddate>20161001</enddate><creator>dos Anjos, Dalton A.</creator><creator>Habr-Gama, Angelita</creator><creator>Vailati, Bruna B.</creator><creator>Rossi, Cecilia B.</creator><creator>Coturel, Adelina E.</creator><creator>Perez, Rodrigo O.</creator><creator>São Julião, Guilherme P.</creator><creator>de Sousa, João B.</creator><creator>Buchpiguel, Carlos A.</creator><general>Springer Japan</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161001</creationdate><title>18F-FDG uptake by rectal cancer is similar in mucinous and nonmucinous histological subtypes</title><author>dos Anjos, Dalton A. ; Habr-Gama, Angelita ; Vailati, Bruna B. ; Rossi, Cecilia B. ; Coturel, Adelina E. ; Perez, Rodrigo O. ; São Julião, Guilherme P. ; de Sousa, João B. ; Buchpiguel, Carlos A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c242t-45f790cd131668c5ac95ea25f8d7372c00157285cbb4ca2e07103e96a19a40aa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Nuclear Medicine</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>dos Anjos, Dalton A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Habr-Gama, Angelita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vailati, Bruna B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossi, Cecilia B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coturel, Adelina E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perez, Rodrigo O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>São Julião, Guilherme P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Sousa, João B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchpiguel, Carlos A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Annals of nuclear medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>dos Anjos, Dalton A.</au><au>Habr-Gama, Angelita</au><au>Vailati, Bruna B.</au><au>Rossi, Cecilia B.</au><au>Coturel, Adelina E.</au><au>Perez, Rodrigo O.</au><au>São Julião, Guilherme P.</au><au>de Sousa, João B.</au><au>Buchpiguel, Carlos A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>18F-FDG uptake by rectal cancer is similar in mucinous and nonmucinous histological subtypes</atitle><jtitle>Annals of nuclear medicine</jtitle><stitle>Ann Nucl Med</stitle><date>2016-10-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>513</spage><epage>517</epage><pages>513-517</pages><issn>0914-7187</issn><eissn>1864-6433</eissn><abstract>Purpose
PET/CT has been considered limited for the evaluation of mucinous colorectal tumors due to low
18
F-FDG uptake. The aim of our study was to compare PET/CT variables in mucinous (MC) and nonmucinous (NMC) rectal adenocarcinomas.
Methods
Consecutive patients with cT2-4N0-2M0 rectal cancer included in a prospective clinical trial were reviewed. PET/CT was performed for primary baseline staging. Visual and quantitative analysis included SUVmax and SUVmean, metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). PET/CT parameters were compared according to histological subtypes.
Results
Overall, 73 patients were included (18 mucinous and 55 nonmucinous). SUVmax values were similar between MC and NMC (19.7 vs. 16.6;
p
= 0.5). MTV and TLG values were greater in the MC group (103.9 vs. 54.1;
p
= 0.007 and 892.5 vs. 358.8;
p
= 0.020) due to larger tumor volumes of MC.
Conclusions
Metabolic parameters at baseline PET/CT for patients with rectal cancer are similar in mucinous and nonmucinous histological subtypes.</abstract><cop>Tokyo</cop><pub>Springer Japan</pub><doi>10.1007/s12149-016-1089-4</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0914-7187 |
| ispartof | Annals of nuclear medicine, 2016-10, Vol.30 (8), p.513-517 |
| issn | 0914-7187 1864-6433 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_s12149_016_1089_4 |
| source | Springer Link |
| subjects | Imaging Medicine Medicine & Public Health Nuclear Medicine Original Article Radiology |
| title | 18F-FDG uptake by rectal cancer is similar in mucinous and nonmucinous histological subtypes |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T06%3A35%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref_sprin&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=18F-FDG%20uptake%20by%20rectal%20cancer%20is%20similar%20in%20mucinous%20and%20nonmucinous%20histological%20subtypes&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20nuclear%20medicine&rft.au=dos%20Anjos,%20Dalton%20A.&rft.date=2016-10-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=513&rft.epage=517&rft.pages=513-517&rft.issn=0914-7187&rft.eissn=1864-6433&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12149-016-1089-4&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref_sprin%3E10_1007_s12149_016_1089_4%3C/crossref_sprin%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c242t-45f790cd131668c5ac95ea25f8d7372c00157285cbb4ca2e07103e96a19a40aa3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |