Loading…
ADI-AMD recommendations on insulin treatment during artificial nutrition
The prevalence of diabetes in hospitalised patients is not well identified; in 2000, 12.5% of patients discharged from US hospitals were diagnosed as having diabetes. In Italy data are limited; in Campania, these data show a 6% prevalence of diabetes in discharged patients, while in Emilia Romagna i...
Saved in:
Published in: | Mediterranean Journal of nutrition and metabolism 2010-04, Vol.3 (1), p.81-95 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c240t-8cae1099ba1c5d178e487be9ded393dea1e15f0f979162bafbdbcb2bc352fb663 |
container_end_page | 95 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 81 |
container_title | Mediterranean Journal of nutrition and metabolism |
container_volume | 3 |
creator | Fatati, Giuseppe Cortinovis, Fiorenzo Fontana, Lucia Fusco, Maria Antonia Leotta, Sergio Marelli, Giuseppe Mirri, Eva Parillo, Mario Sukkar, Samir G. Tagliaferri, Marco Tomasi, Franco Tubili, Claudio |
description | The prevalence of diabetes in hospitalised patients is not well identified; in 2000, 12.5% of patients discharged from US hospitals were diagnosed as having diabetes. In Italy data are limited; in Campania, these data show a 6% prevalence of diabetes in discharged patients, while in Emilia Romagna it reaches 21%. These data do not consider stress hyperglycaemia. There are in fact three categories of people who may have hyperglycaemia during hospitalisation: those with known diabetes diagnosed before hospitalisation; those with diabetes diagnosed during hospitalisation; and those with stress hyperglycaemia, i.e., hyperglycaemia occurring during hospitalisation, but decreasing at the time of discharge. Observational studies have clearly shown how hyperglycaemia leads to a worsening of prognosis because of increased morbidity and mortality and of longer hospitalisation in cases of known diabetes and of stress hyperglycaemia. Intervention studies have confirmed that strict glycaemic control brings about significant improvement of prognosis, thus the importance of good glycaemic control is recognised today, also for critically ill patients receiving artificial nutrition (AN). In recent years, the interest in prevention of microangiopathic and macroangiopathic complications has shifted the interest toward hyperglycaemic peaks and glycaemic variability, along with the “glycated haemoglobin” factor. In hospitals most patients do not receive adequate nutritional support for their calorie requirements, either for preventing or curing protein-energy malnutrition (PEM). One of the reasons for inadequate treatment is precisely the fear of worsening hyperglycaemia; from this perspective, hyperglycaemia is considered the major obstacle in practising proper nutritional support. On the other hand, the use of AN without adequate insulin therapy may cause serious metabolic decompensation. The ADI-AMD (Italian Dietetics and Clinic Nutrition Association-Diabetologist Association) Diabetes study group (GS) considered it advisable to review the previous recommendations drawn up in 2005. The scientific proof level at the basis of each recommendation was classified according to that provided for by the National Guidelines Plan. The document reports the objectives considered desirable in handling the majority of the patients with hyperglycaemia while receiving AN; comorbidity and other factors connected with the individual case may justify different choices. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12349-009-0073-0 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref_sprin</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_s12349_009_0073_0</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1007_s12349_009_0073_0</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c240t-8cae1099ba1c5d178e487be9ded393dea1e15f0f979162bafbdbcb2bc352fb663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KAzEURoMoWKsP4C4vMHqTzEwmy9KqLVTcKLgL-ZWUaaYkmYVv7wwVly4u94PLuXwchO4JPBAA_pgJZbWoAObhrIILtCBiClyI7vIvd5_X6CbnA0BLOSMLtF1tdtXqdYOTM8Px6KJVJQwx4yHiEPPYh4hLcqpMp4LtmEL8wiqV4IMJqsdxLCnMxC268qrP7u53L9HH89P7elvt315269W-MrSGUnVGOQJCaEVMYwnvXN1x7YR1lglmnSKONB684IK0VCuvrTaaasMa6nXbsiUi578mDTkn5-UphaNK35KAnFXIswo5qZCzCgkTQ89MPs39XZKHYUxxqvkP9AMkmGNY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>ADI-AMD recommendations on insulin treatment during artificial nutrition</title><source>Springer</source><creator>Fatati, Giuseppe ; Cortinovis, Fiorenzo ; Fontana, Lucia ; Fusco, Maria Antonia ; Leotta, Sergio ; Marelli, Giuseppe ; Mirri, Eva ; Parillo, Mario ; Sukkar, Samir G. ; Tagliaferri, Marco ; Tomasi, Franco ; Tubili, Claudio</creator><creatorcontrib>Fatati, Giuseppe ; Cortinovis, Fiorenzo ; Fontana, Lucia ; Fusco, Maria Antonia ; Leotta, Sergio ; Marelli, Giuseppe ; Mirri, Eva ; Parillo, Mario ; Sukkar, Samir G. ; Tagliaferri, Marco ; Tomasi, Franco ; Tubili, Claudio</creatorcontrib><description>The prevalence of diabetes in hospitalised patients is not well identified; in 2000, 12.5% of patients discharged from US hospitals were diagnosed as having diabetes. In Italy data are limited; in Campania, these data show a 6% prevalence of diabetes in discharged patients, while in Emilia Romagna it reaches 21%. These data do not consider stress hyperglycaemia. There are in fact three categories of people who may have hyperglycaemia during hospitalisation: those with known diabetes diagnosed before hospitalisation; those with diabetes diagnosed during hospitalisation; and those with stress hyperglycaemia, i.e., hyperglycaemia occurring during hospitalisation, but decreasing at the time of discharge. Observational studies have clearly shown how hyperglycaemia leads to a worsening of prognosis because of increased morbidity and mortality and of longer hospitalisation in cases of known diabetes and of stress hyperglycaemia. Intervention studies have confirmed that strict glycaemic control brings about significant improvement of prognosis, thus the importance of good glycaemic control is recognised today, also for critically ill patients receiving artificial nutrition (AN). In recent years, the interest in prevention of microangiopathic and macroangiopathic complications has shifted the interest toward hyperglycaemic peaks and glycaemic variability, along with the “glycated haemoglobin” factor. In hospitals most patients do not receive adequate nutritional support for their calorie requirements, either for preventing or curing protein-energy malnutrition (PEM). One of the reasons for inadequate treatment is precisely the fear of worsening hyperglycaemia; from this perspective, hyperglycaemia is considered the major obstacle in practising proper nutritional support. On the other hand, the use of AN without adequate insulin therapy may cause serious metabolic decompensation. The ADI-AMD (Italian Dietetics and Clinic Nutrition Association-Diabetologist Association) Diabetes study group (GS) considered it advisable to review the previous recommendations drawn up in 2005. The scientific proof level at the basis of each recommendation was classified according to that provided for by the National Guidelines Plan. The document reports the objectives considered desirable in handling the majority of the patients with hyperglycaemia while receiving AN; comorbidity and other factors connected with the individual case may justify different choices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1973-798X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1973-7998</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12349-009-0073-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Milan: Springer Milan</publisher><subject>Chemistry ; Chemistry and Materials Science ; Diabetes ; Food Science ; Metabolic Diseases ; Nutrition ; Oncology ; Position Paper</subject><ispartof>Mediterranean Journal of nutrition and metabolism, 2010-04, Vol.3 (1), p.81-95</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Italia 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c240t-8cae1099ba1c5d178e487be9ded393dea1e15f0f979162bafbdbcb2bc352fb663</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12349-009-0073-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12349-009-0073-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1644,27924,27925,41418,42487,51318</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fatati, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cortinovis, Fiorenzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fontana, Lucia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fusco, Maria Antonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leotta, Sergio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marelli, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mirri, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parillo, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sukkar, Samir G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tagliaferri, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomasi, Franco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tubili, Claudio</creatorcontrib><title>ADI-AMD recommendations on insulin treatment during artificial nutrition</title><title>Mediterranean Journal of nutrition and metabolism</title><addtitle>Mediterr J Nutr Metab</addtitle><description>The prevalence of diabetes in hospitalised patients is not well identified; in 2000, 12.5% of patients discharged from US hospitals were diagnosed as having diabetes. In Italy data are limited; in Campania, these data show a 6% prevalence of diabetes in discharged patients, while in Emilia Romagna it reaches 21%. These data do not consider stress hyperglycaemia. There are in fact three categories of people who may have hyperglycaemia during hospitalisation: those with known diabetes diagnosed before hospitalisation; those with diabetes diagnosed during hospitalisation; and those with stress hyperglycaemia, i.e., hyperglycaemia occurring during hospitalisation, but decreasing at the time of discharge. Observational studies have clearly shown how hyperglycaemia leads to a worsening of prognosis because of increased morbidity and mortality and of longer hospitalisation in cases of known diabetes and of stress hyperglycaemia. Intervention studies have confirmed that strict glycaemic control brings about significant improvement of prognosis, thus the importance of good glycaemic control is recognised today, also for critically ill patients receiving artificial nutrition (AN). In recent years, the interest in prevention of microangiopathic and macroangiopathic complications has shifted the interest toward hyperglycaemic peaks and glycaemic variability, along with the “glycated haemoglobin” factor. In hospitals most patients do not receive adequate nutritional support for their calorie requirements, either for preventing or curing protein-energy malnutrition (PEM). One of the reasons for inadequate treatment is precisely the fear of worsening hyperglycaemia; from this perspective, hyperglycaemia is considered the major obstacle in practising proper nutritional support. On the other hand, the use of AN without adequate insulin therapy may cause serious metabolic decompensation. The ADI-AMD (Italian Dietetics and Clinic Nutrition Association-Diabetologist Association) Diabetes study group (GS) considered it advisable to review the previous recommendations drawn up in 2005. The scientific proof level at the basis of each recommendation was classified according to that provided for by the National Guidelines Plan. The document reports the objectives considered desirable in handling the majority of the patients with hyperglycaemia while receiving AN; comorbidity and other factors connected with the individual case may justify different choices.</description><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry and Materials Science</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Food Science</subject><subject>Metabolic Diseases</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Position Paper</subject><issn>1973-798X</issn><issn>1973-7998</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1KAzEURoMoWKsP4C4vMHqTzEwmy9KqLVTcKLgL-ZWUaaYkmYVv7wwVly4u94PLuXwchO4JPBAA_pgJZbWoAObhrIILtCBiClyI7vIvd5_X6CbnA0BLOSMLtF1tdtXqdYOTM8Px6KJVJQwx4yHiEPPYh4hLcqpMp4LtmEL8wiqV4IMJqsdxLCnMxC268qrP7u53L9HH89P7elvt315269W-MrSGUnVGOQJCaEVMYwnvXN1x7YR1lglmnSKONB684IK0VCuvrTaaasMa6nXbsiUi578mDTkn5-UphaNK35KAnFXIswo5qZCzCgkTQ89MPs39XZKHYUxxqvkP9AMkmGNY</recordid><startdate>201004</startdate><enddate>201004</enddate><creator>Fatati, Giuseppe</creator><creator>Cortinovis, Fiorenzo</creator><creator>Fontana, Lucia</creator><creator>Fusco, Maria Antonia</creator><creator>Leotta, Sergio</creator><creator>Marelli, Giuseppe</creator><creator>Mirri, Eva</creator><creator>Parillo, Mario</creator><creator>Sukkar, Samir G.</creator><creator>Tagliaferri, Marco</creator><creator>Tomasi, Franco</creator><creator>Tubili, Claudio</creator><general>Springer Milan</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201004</creationdate><title>ADI-AMD recommendations on insulin treatment during artificial nutrition</title><author>Fatati, Giuseppe ; Cortinovis, Fiorenzo ; Fontana, Lucia ; Fusco, Maria Antonia ; Leotta, Sergio ; Marelli, Giuseppe ; Mirri, Eva ; Parillo, Mario ; Sukkar, Samir G. ; Tagliaferri, Marco ; Tomasi, Franco ; Tubili, Claudio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c240t-8cae1099ba1c5d178e487be9ded393dea1e15f0f979162bafbdbcb2bc352fb663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry and Materials Science</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Food Science</topic><topic>Metabolic Diseases</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Position Paper</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fatati, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cortinovis, Fiorenzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fontana, Lucia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fusco, Maria Antonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leotta, Sergio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marelli, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mirri, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parillo, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sukkar, Samir G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tagliaferri, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomasi, Franco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tubili, Claudio</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Mediterranean Journal of nutrition and metabolism</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fatati, Giuseppe</au><au>Cortinovis, Fiorenzo</au><au>Fontana, Lucia</au><au>Fusco, Maria Antonia</au><au>Leotta, Sergio</au><au>Marelli, Giuseppe</au><au>Mirri, Eva</au><au>Parillo, Mario</au><au>Sukkar, Samir G.</au><au>Tagliaferri, Marco</au><au>Tomasi, Franco</au><au>Tubili, Claudio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>ADI-AMD recommendations on insulin treatment during artificial nutrition</atitle><jtitle>Mediterranean Journal of nutrition and metabolism</jtitle><stitle>Mediterr J Nutr Metab</stitle><date>2010-04</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>81</spage><epage>95</epage><pages>81-95</pages><issn>1973-798X</issn><eissn>1973-7998</eissn><abstract>The prevalence of diabetes in hospitalised patients is not well identified; in 2000, 12.5% of patients discharged from US hospitals were diagnosed as having diabetes. In Italy data are limited; in Campania, these data show a 6% prevalence of diabetes in discharged patients, while in Emilia Romagna it reaches 21%. These data do not consider stress hyperglycaemia. There are in fact three categories of people who may have hyperglycaemia during hospitalisation: those with known diabetes diagnosed before hospitalisation; those with diabetes diagnosed during hospitalisation; and those with stress hyperglycaemia, i.e., hyperglycaemia occurring during hospitalisation, but decreasing at the time of discharge. Observational studies have clearly shown how hyperglycaemia leads to a worsening of prognosis because of increased morbidity and mortality and of longer hospitalisation in cases of known diabetes and of stress hyperglycaemia. Intervention studies have confirmed that strict glycaemic control brings about significant improvement of prognosis, thus the importance of good glycaemic control is recognised today, also for critically ill patients receiving artificial nutrition (AN). In recent years, the interest in prevention of microangiopathic and macroangiopathic complications has shifted the interest toward hyperglycaemic peaks and glycaemic variability, along with the “glycated haemoglobin” factor. In hospitals most patients do not receive adequate nutritional support for their calorie requirements, either for preventing or curing protein-energy malnutrition (PEM). One of the reasons for inadequate treatment is precisely the fear of worsening hyperglycaemia; from this perspective, hyperglycaemia is considered the major obstacle in practising proper nutritional support. On the other hand, the use of AN without adequate insulin therapy may cause serious metabolic decompensation. The ADI-AMD (Italian Dietetics and Clinic Nutrition Association-Diabetologist Association) Diabetes study group (GS) considered it advisable to review the previous recommendations drawn up in 2005. The scientific proof level at the basis of each recommendation was classified according to that provided for by the National Guidelines Plan. The document reports the objectives considered desirable in handling the majority of the patients with hyperglycaemia while receiving AN; comorbidity and other factors connected with the individual case may justify different choices.</abstract><cop>Milan</cop><pub>Springer Milan</pub><doi>10.1007/s12349-009-0073-0</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1973-798X |
ispartof | Mediterranean Journal of nutrition and metabolism, 2010-04, Vol.3 (1), p.81-95 |
issn | 1973-798X 1973-7998 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_s12349_009_0073_0 |
source | Springer |
subjects | Chemistry Chemistry and Materials Science Diabetes Food Science Metabolic Diseases Nutrition Oncology Position Paper |
title | ADI-AMD recommendations on insulin treatment during artificial nutrition |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T01%3A32%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref_sprin&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=ADI-AMD%20recommendations%20on%20insulin%20treatment%20during%20artificial%20nutrition&rft.jtitle=Mediterranean%20Journal%20of%20nutrition%20and%20metabolism&rft.au=Fatati,%20Giuseppe&rft.date=2010-04&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=81&rft.epage=95&rft.pages=81-95&rft.issn=1973-798X&rft.eissn=1973-7998&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12349-009-0073-0&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref_sprin%3E10_1007_s12349_009_0073_0%3C/crossref_sprin%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c240t-8cae1099ba1c5d178e487be9ded393dea1e15f0f979162bafbdbcb2bc352fb663%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |