Loading…

Multi-criteria evaluation of the extraction methods of rare earth elements from aqueous streams

This study aims to evaluate the extraction methods of rare earth elements (REEs) from aqueous solution streams using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method. However, their extraction from aqueous solutions is challenging due to their low concentration and complex chemical properties. The AHP me...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of environmental science and technology (Tehran) 2023-09, Vol.20 (9), p.9707-9716
Main Authors: Sadeghi, A., Kermani Alghorayshi, S. T., Shamsi, M., Mirjani, F.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c242t-a3fc1fadb785f13b1aab1c48a94fd231f4aa216fb13666cb3b40231a6c99e6993
container_end_page 9716
container_issue 9
container_start_page 9707
container_title International journal of environmental science and technology (Tehran)
container_volume 20
creator Sadeghi, A.
Kermani Alghorayshi, S. T.
Shamsi, M.
Mirjani, F.
description This study aims to evaluate the extraction methods of rare earth elements (REEs) from aqueous solution streams using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method. However, their extraction from aqueous solutions is challenging due to their low concentration and complex chemical properties. The AHP method is a multi-criteria decision-making tool that allows for the prioritization of different criteria based on their relative importance. In this study, eight extraction methods were evaluated based on three criteria: economic justification, technical justification, and environmental justification. The eight methods included adsorption, biosorption, chemical precipitation, electrocoagulation, ion flotation, ion exchange, membrane filtration, and solvent extraction. The results showed that flotation was the most efficient method for REE extraction, with a score of 0.176, followed by adsorption, with a score of 0.149. Biosorption and solvent extraction had lower scores of 0.147 and 0.136, respectively. Besides, another AHP was conducted to prioritize the three surfactant categories used in the ion flotation process based on seven criteria: capacity, cost, efficiency, recovery duration, repeatability, scalability, and selectivity. The three surfactant categories included bio-based, chemo-based, and nano-based surfactants. The results indicate that nano-surfactants were the most suitable surfactants for REE extraction by ion flotation with a score of 0.465, followed by chemo-surfactants with a score of 0.390. Overall, this study provides valuable insights into evaluating different REE extraction methods using the AHP methodology. The findings can help researchers and industry professionals decide on selecting appropriate REE extraction methods based on their specific needs and priorities. Graphical abstract
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s13762-023-05081-7
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref_sprin</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_s13762_023_05081_7</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1007_s13762_023_05081_7</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c242t-a3fc1fadb785f13b1aab1c48a94fd231f4aa216fb13666cb3b40231a6c99e6993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6z8AwaP7drNElW8pCI2sLYmjk1TJTHYDoK_J32sWc1o7pzRnUvINfAb4NzcZpBGC8aFZHzBl8DMCZmBkQsmtOSnxx6UEefkIuct50orBTNiX8autMyltvjUIvXf2I1Y2jjQGGjZeOp_SkK3n_S-bGKTd0rCNEmYyob6zvd-KJmGFHuKX6OPY6a5JI99viRnAbvsr451Tt4f7t9WT2z9-vi8ulszJ5QoDGVwELCpzXIRQNaAWINTS6xUaISEoBAF6FCD1Fq7WtZq-hVQu6ryuqrknIjDXZdizskH-5naHtOvBW53EdlDRHbC7D4iayZIHqA8LQ8fPtltHNMw-fyP-gMmoWvv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multi-criteria evaluation of the extraction methods of rare earth elements from aqueous streams</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Sadeghi, A. ; Kermani Alghorayshi, S. T. ; Shamsi, M. ; Mirjani, F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sadeghi, A. ; Kermani Alghorayshi, S. T. ; Shamsi, M. ; Mirjani, F.</creatorcontrib><description>This study aims to evaluate the extraction methods of rare earth elements (REEs) from aqueous solution streams using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method. However, their extraction from aqueous solutions is challenging due to their low concentration and complex chemical properties. The AHP method is a multi-criteria decision-making tool that allows for the prioritization of different criteria based on their relative importance. In this study, eight extraction methods were evaluated based on three criteria: economic justification, technical justification, and environmental justification. The eight methods included adsorption, biosorption, chemical precipitation, electrocoagulation, ion flotation, ion exchange, membrane filtration, and solvent extraction. The results showed that flotation was the most efficient method for REE extraction, with a score of 0.176, followed by adsorption, with a score of 0.149. Biosorption and solvent extraction had lower scores of 0.147 and 0.136, respectively. Besides, another AHP was conducted to prioritize the three surfactant categories used in the ion flotation process based on seven criteria: capacity, cost, efficiency, recovery duration, repeatability, scalability, and selectivity. The three surfactant categories included bio-based, chemo-based, and nano-based surfactants. The results indicate that nano-surfactants were the most suitable surfactants for REE extraction by ion flotation with a score of 0.465, followed by chemo-surfactants with a score of 0.390. Overall, this study provides valuable insights into evaluating different REE extraction methods using the AHP methodology. The findings can help researchers and industry professionals decide on selecting appropriate REE extraction methods based on their specific needs and priorities. Graphical abstract</description><identifier>ISSN: 1735-1472</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1735-2630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13762-023-05081-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Aquatic Pollution ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecotoxicology ; Environment ; Environmental Chemistry ; Environmental Science and Engineering ; Original Paper ; Soil Science &amp; Conservation ; Waste Water Technology ; Water Management ; Water Pollution Control</subject><ispartof>International journal of environmental science and technology (Tehran), 2023-09, Vol.20 (9), p.9707-9716</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Iranian Society of Environmentalists (IRSEN) and Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c242t-a3fc1fadb785f13b1aab1c48a94fd231f4aa216fb13666cb3b40231a6c99e6993</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sadeghi, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kermani Alghorayshi, S. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shamsi, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mirjani, F.</creatorcontrib><title>Multi-criteria evaluation of the extraction methods of rare earth elements from aqueous streams</title><title>International journal of environmental science and technology (Tehran)</title><addtitle>Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><description>This study aims to evaluate the extraction methods of rare earth elements (REEs) from aqueous solution streams using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method. However, their extraction from aqueous solutions is challenging due to their low concentration and complex chemical properties. The AHP method is a multi-criteria decision-making tool that allows for the prioritization of different criteria based on their relative importance. In this study, eight extraction methods were evaluated based on three criteria: economic justification, technical justification, and environmental justification. The eight methods included adsorption, biosorption, chemical precipitation, electrocoagulation, ion flotation, ion exchange, membrane filtration, and solvent extraction. The results showed that flotation was the most efficient method for REE extraction, with a score of 0.176, followed by adsorption, with a score of 0.149. Biosorption and solvent extraction had lower scores of 0.147 and 0.136, respectively. Besides, another AHP was conducted to prioritize the three surfactant categories used in the ion flotation process based on seven criteria: capacity, cost, efficiency, recovery duration, repeatability, scalability, and selectivity. The three surfactant categories included bio-based, chemo-based, and nano-based surfactants. The results indicate that nano-surfactants were the most suitable surfactants for REE extraction by ion flotation with a score of 0.465, followed by chemo-surfactants with a score of 0.390. Overall, this study provides valuable insights into evaluating different REE extraction methods using the AHP methodology. The findings can help researchers and industry professionals decide on selecting appropriate REE extraction methods based on their specific needs and priorities. Graphical abstract</description><subject>Aquatic Pollution</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Chemistry</subject><subject>Environmental Science and Engineering</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Soil Science &amp; Conservation</subject><subject>Waste Water Technology</subject><subject>Water Management</subject><subject>Water Pollution Control</subject><issn>1735-1472</issn><issn>1735-2630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6z8AwaP7drNElW8pCI2sLYmjk1TJTHYDoK_J32sWc1o7pzRnUvINfAb4NzcZpBGC8aFZHzBl8DMCZmBkQsmtOSnxx6UEefkIuct50orBTNiX8autMyltvjUIvXf2I1Y2jjQGGjZeOp_SkK3n_S-bGKTd0rCNEmYyob6zvd-KJmGFHuKX6OPY6a5JI99viRnAbvsr451Tt4f7t9WT2z9-vi8ulszJ5QoDGVwELCpzXIRQNaAWINTS6xUaISEoBAF6FCD1Fq7WtZq-hVQu6ryuqrknIjDXZdizskH-5naHtOvBW53EdlDRHbC7D4iayZIHqA8LQ8fPtltHNMw-fyP-gMmoWvv</recordid><startdate>20230901</startdate><enddate>20230901</enddate><creator>Sadeghi, A.</creator><creator>Kermani Alghorayshi, S. T.</creator><creator>Shamsi, M.</creator><creator>Mirjani, F.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230901</creationdate><title>Multi-criteria evaluation of the extraction methods of rare earth elements from aqueous streams</title><author>Sadeghi, A. ; Kermani Alghorayshi, S. T. ; Shamsi, M. ; Mirjani, F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c242t-a3fc1fadb785f13b1aab1c48a94fd231f4aa216fb13666cb3b40231a6c99e6993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Aquatic Pollution</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Chemistry</topic><topic>Environmental Science and Engineering</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Soil Science &amp; Conservation</topic><topic>Waste Water Technology</topic><topic>Water Management</topic><topic>Water Pollution Control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sadeghi, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kermani Alghorayshi, S. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shamsi, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mirjani, F.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International journal of environmental science and technology (Tehran)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sadeghi, A.</au><au>Kermani Alghorayshi, S. T.</au><au>Shamsi, M.</au><au>Mirjani, F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multi-criteria evaluation of the extraction methods of rare earth elements from aqueous streams</atitle><jtitle>International journal of environmental science and technology (Tehran)</jtitle><stitle>Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol</stitle><date>2023-09-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>9707</spage><epage>9716</epage><pages>9707-9716</pages><issn>1735-1472</issn><eissn>1735-2630</eissn><abstract>This study aims to evaluate the extraction methods of rare earth elements (REEs) from aqueous solution streams using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method. However, their extraction from aqueous solutions is challenging due to their low concentration and complex chemical properties. The AHP method is a multi-criteria decision-making tool that allows for the prioritization of different criteria based on their relative importance. In this study, eight extraction methods were evaluated based on three criteria: economic justification, technical justification, and environmental justification. The eight methods included adsorption, biosorption, chemical precipitation, electrocoagulation, ion flotation, ion exchange, membrane filtration, and solvent extraction. The results showed that flotation was the most efficient method for REE extraction, with a score of 0.176, followed by adsorption, with a score of 0.149. Biosorption and solvent extraction had lower scores of 0.147 and 0.136, respectively. Besides, another AHP was conducted to prioritize the three surfactant categories used in the ion flotation process based on seven criteria: capacity, cost, efficiency, recovery duration, repeatability, scalability, and selectivity. The three surfactant categories included bio-based, chemo-based, and nano-based surfactants. The results indicate that nano-surfactants were the most suitable surfactants for REE extraction by ion flotation with a score of 0.465, followed by chemo-surfactants with a score of 0.390. Overall, this study provides valuable insights into evaluating different REE extraction methods using the AHP methodology. The findings can help researchers and industry professionals decide on selecting appropriate REE extraction methods based on their specific needs and priorities. Graphical abstract</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s13762-023-05081-7</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1735-1472
ispartof International journal of environmental science and technology (Tehran), 2023-09, Vol.20 (9), p.9707-9716
issn 1735-1472
1735-2630
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_s13762_023_05081_7
source Springer Nature
subjects Aquatic Pollution
Earth and Environmental Science
Ecotoxicology
Environment
Environmental Chemistry
Environmental Science and Engineering
Original Paper
Soil Science & Conservation
Waste Water Technology
Water Management
Water Pollution Control
title Multi-criteria evaluation of the extraction methods of rare earth elements from aqueous streams
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T12%3A43%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref_sprin&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multi-criteria%20evaluation%20of%20the%20extraction%20methods%20of%20rare%20earth%20elements%20from%20aqueous%20streams&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20environmental%20science%20and%20technology%20(Tehran)&rft.au=Sadeghi,%20A.&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=9707&rft.epage=9716&rft.pages=9707-9716&rft.issn=1735-1472&rft.eissn=1735-2630&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13762-023-05081-7&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref_sprin%3E10_1007_s13762_023_05081_7%3C/crossref_sprin%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c242t-a3fc1fadb785f13b1aab1c48a94fd231f4aa216fb13666cb3b40231a6c99e6993%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true