Loading…
Multi-criteria evaluation of the extraction methods of rare earth elements from aqueous streams
This study aims to evaluate the extraction methods of rare earth elements (REEs) from aqueous solution streams using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method. However, their extraction from aqueous solutions is challenging due to their low concentration and complex chemical properties. The AHP me...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of environmental science and technology (Tehran) 2023-09, Vol.20 (9), p.9707-9716 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c242t-a3fc1fadb785f13b1aab1c48a94fd231f4aa216fb13666cb3b40231a6c99e6993 |
container_end_page | 9716 |
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 9707 |
container_title | International journal of environmental science and technology (Tehran) |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Sadeghi, A. Kermani Alghorayshi, S. T. Shamsi, M. Mirjani, F. |
description | This study aims to evaluate the extraction methods of rare earth elements (REEs) from aqueous solution streams using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method. However, their extraction from aqueous solutions is challenging due to their low concentration and complex chemical properties. The AHP method is a multi-criteria decision-making tool that allows for the prioritization of different criteria based on their relative importance. In this study, eight extraction methods were evaluated based on three criteria: economic justification, technical justification, and environmental justification. The eight methods included adsorption, biosorption, chemical precipitation, electrocoagulation, ion flotation, ion exchange, membrane filtration, and solvent extraction. The results showed that flotation was the most efficient method for REE extraction, with a score of 0.176, followed by adsorption, with a score of 0.149. Biosorption and solvent extraction had lower scores of 0.147 and 0.136, respectively. Besides, another AHP was conducted to prioritize the three surfactant categories used in the ion flotation process based on seven criteria: capacity, cost, efficiency, recovery duration, repeatability, scalability, and selectivity. The three surfactant categories included bio-based, chemo-based, and nano-based surfactants. The results indicate that nano-surfactants were the most suitable surfactants for REE extraction by ion flotation with a score of 0.465, followed by chemo-surfactants with a score of 0.390. Overall, this study provides valuable insights into evaluating different REE extraction methods using the AHP methodology. The findings can help researchers and industry professionals decide on selecting appropriate REE extraction methods based on their specific needs and priorities.
Graphical abstract |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s13762-023-05081-7 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref_sprin</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_s13762_023_05081_7</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1007_s13762_023_05081_7</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c242t-a3fc1fadb785f13b1aab1c48a94fd231f4aa216fb13666cb3b40231a6c99e6993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6z8AwaP7drNElW8pCI2sLYmjk1TJTHYDoK_J32sWc1o7pzRnUvINfAb4NzcZpBGC8aFZHzBl8DMCZmBkQsmtOSnxx6UEefkIuct50orBTNiX8autMyltvjUIvXf2I1Y2jjQGGjZeOp_SkK3n_S-bGKTd0rCNEmYyob6zvd-KJmGFHuKX6OPY6a5JI99viRnAbvsr451Tt4f7t9WT2z9-vi8ulszJ5QoDGVwELCpzXIRQNaAWINTS6xUaISEoBAF6FCD1Fq7WtZq-hVQu6ryuqrknIjDXZdizskH-5naHtOvBW53EdlDRHbC7D4iayZIHqA8LQ8fPtltHNMw-fyP-gMmoWvv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multi-criteria evaluation of the extraction methods of rare earth elements from aqueous streams</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Sadeghi, A. ; Kermani Alghorayshi, S. T. ; Shamsi, M. ; Mirjani, F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sadeghi, A. ; Kermani Alghorayshi, S. T. ; Shamsi, M. ; Mirjani, F.</creatorcontrib><description>This study aims to evaluate the extraction methods of rare earth elements (REEs) from aqueous solution streams using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method. However, their extraction from aqueous solutions is challenging due to their low concentration and complex chemical properties. The AHP method is a multi-criteria decision-making tool that allows for the prioritization of different criteria based on their relative importance. In this study, eight extraction methods were evaluated based on three criteria: economic justification, technical justification, and environmental justification. The eight methods included adsorption, biosorption, chemical precipitation, electrocoagulation, ion flotation, ion exchange, membrane filtration, and solvent extraction. The results showed that flotation was the most efficient method for REE extraction, with a score of 0.176, followed by adsorption, with a score of 0.149. Biosorption and solvent extraction had lower scores of 0.147 and 0.136, respectively. Besides, another AHP was conducted to prioritize the three surfactant categories used in the ion flotation process based on seven criteria: capacity, cost, efficiency, recovery duration, repeatability, scalability, and selectivity. The three surfactant categories included bio-based, chemo-based, and nano-based surfactants. The results indicate that nano-surfactants were the most suitable surfactants for REE extraction by ion flotation with a score of 0.465, followed by chemo-surfactants with a score of 0.390. Overall, this study provides valuable insights into evaluating different REE extraction methods using the AHP methodology. The findings can help researchers and industry professionals decide on selecting appropriate REE extraction methods based on their specific needs and priorities.
Graphical abstract</description><identifier>ISSN: 1735-1472</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1735-2630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13762-023-05081-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Aquatic Pollution ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecotoxicology ; Environment ; Environmental Chemistry ; Environmental Science and Engineering ; Original Paper ; Soil Science & Conservation ; Waste Water Technology ; Water Management ; Water Pollution Control</subject><ispartof>International journal of environmental science and technology (Tehran), 2023-09, Vol.20 (9), p.9707-9716</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Iranian Society of Environmentalists (IRSEN) and Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c242t-a3fc1fadb785f13b1aab1c48a94fd231f4aa216fb13666cb3b40231a6c99e6993</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sadeghi, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kermani Alghorayshi, S. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shamsi, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mirjani, F.</creatorcontrib><title>Multi-criteria evaluation of the extraction methods of rare earth elements from aqueous streams</title><title>International journal of environmental science and technology (Tehran)</title><addtitle>Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><description>This study aims to evaluate the extraction methods of rare earth elements (REEs) from aqueous solution streams using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method. However, their extraction from aqueous solutions is challenging due to their low concentration and complex chemical properties. The AHP method is a multi-criteria decision-making tool that allows for the prioritization of different criteria based on their relative importance. In this study, eight extraction methods were evaluated based on three criteria: economic justification, technical justification, and environmental justification. The eight methods included adsorption, biosorption, chemical precipitation, electrocoagulation, ion flotation, ion exchange, membrane filtration, and solvent extraction. The results showed that flotation was the most efficient method for REE extraction, with a score of 0.176, followed by adsorption, with a score of 0.149. Biosorption and solvent extraction had lower scores of 0.147 and 0.136, respectively. Besides, another AHP was conducted to prioritize the three surfactant categories used in the ion flotation process based on seven criteria: capacity, cost, efficiency, recovery duration, repeatability, scalability, and selectivity. The three surfactant categories included bio-based, chemo-based, and nano-based surfactants. The results indicate that nano-surfactants were the most suitable surfactants for REE extraction by ion flotation with a score of 0.465, followed by chemo-surfactants with a score of 0.390. Overall, this study provides valuable insights into evaluating different REE extraction methods using the AHP methodology. The findings can help researchers and industry professionals decide on selecting appropriate REE extraction methods based on their specific needs and priorities.
Graphical abstract</description><subject>Aquatic Pollution</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Chemistry</subject><subject>Environmental Science and Engineering</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Soil Science & Conservation</subject><subject>Waste Water Technology</subject><subject>Water Management</subject><subject>Water Pollution Control</subject><issn>1735-1472</issn><issn>1735-2630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6z8AwaP7drNElW8pCI2sLYmjk1TJTHYDoK_J32sWc1o7pzRnUvINfAb4NzcZpBGC8aFZHzBl8DMCZmBkQsmtOSnxx6UEefkIuct50orBTNiX8autMyltvjUIvXf2I1Y2jjQGGjZeOp_SkK3n_S-bGKTd0rCNEmYyob6zvd-KJmGFHuKX6OPY6a5JI99viRnAbvsr451Tt4f7t9WT2z9-vi8ulszJ5QoDGVwELCpzXIRQNaAWINTS6xUaISEoBAF6FCD1Fq7WtZq-hVQu6ryuqrknIjDXZdizskH-5naHtOvBW53EdlDRHbC7D4iayZIHqA8LQ8fPtltHNMw-fyP-gMmoWvv</recordid><startdate>20230901</startdate><enddate>20230901</enddate><creator>Sadeghi, A.</creator><creator>Kermani Alghorayshi, S. T.</creator><creator>Shamsi, M.</creator><creator>Mirjani, F.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230901</creationdate><title>Multi-criteria evaluation of the extraction methods of rare earth elements from aqueous streams</title><author>Sadeghi, A. ; Kermani Alghorayshi, S. T. ; Shamsi, M. ; Mirjani, F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c242t-a3fc1fadb785f13b1aab1c48a94fd231f4aa216fb13666cb3b40231a6c99e6993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Aquatic Pollution</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Chemistry</topic><topic>Environmental Science and Engineering</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Soil Science & Conservation</topic><topic>Waste Water Technology</topic><topic>Water Management</topic><topic>Water Pollution Control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sadeghi, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kermani Alghorayshi, S. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shamsi, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mirjani, F.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International journal of environmental science and technology (Tehran)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sadeghi, A.</au><au>Kermani Alghorayshi, S. T.</au><au>Shamsi, M.</au><au>Mirjani, F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multi-criteria evaluation of the extraction methods of rare earth elements from aqueous streams</atitle><jtitle>International journal of environmental science and technology (Tehran)</jtitle><stitle>Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol</stitle><date>2023-09-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>9707</spage><epage>9716</epage><pages>9707-9716</pages><issn>1735-1472</issn><eissn>1735-2630</eissn><abstract>This study aims to evaluate the extraction methods of rare earth elements (REEs) from aqueous solution streams using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method. However, their extraction from aqueous solutions is challenging due to their low concentration and complex chemical properties. The AHP method is a multi-criteria decision-making tool that allows for the prioritization of different criteria based on their relative importance. In this study, eight extraction methods were evaluated based on three criteria: economic justification, technical justification, and environmental justification. The eight methods included adsorption, biosorption, chemical precipitation, electrocoagulation, ion flotation, ion exchange, membrane filtration, and solvent extraction. The results showed that flotation was the most efficient method for REE extraction, with a score of 0.176, followed by adsorption, with a score of 0.149. Biosorption and solvent extraction had lower scores of 0.147 and 0.136, respectively. Besides, another AHP was conducted to prioritize the three surfactant categories used in the ion flotation process based on seven criteria: capacity, cost, efficiency, recovery duration, repeatability, scalability, and selectivity. The three surfactant categories included bio-based, chemo-based, and nano-based surfactants. The results indicate that nano-surfactants were the most suitable surfactants for REE extraction by ion flotation with a score of 0.465, followed by chemo-surfactants with a score of 0.390. Overall, this study provides valuable insights into evaluating different REE extraction methods using the AHP methodology. The findings can help researchers and industry professionals decide on selecting appropriate REE extraction methods based on their specific needs and priorities.
Graphical abstract</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s13762-023-05081-7</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1735-1472 |
ispartof | International journal of environmental science and technology (Tehran), 2023-09, Vol.20 (9), p.9707-9716 |
issn | 1735-1472 1735-2630 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_s13762_023_05081_7 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Aquatic Pollution Earth and Environmental Science Ecotoxicology Environment Environmental Chemistry Environmental Science and Engineering Original Paper Soil Science & Conservation Waste Water Technology Water Management Water Pollution Control |
title | Multi-criteria evaluation of the extraction methods of rare earth elements from aqueous streams |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T12%3A43%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref_sprin&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multi-criteria%20evaluation%20of%20the%20extraction%20methods%20of%20rare%20earth%20elements%20from%20aqueous%20streams&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20environmental%20science%20and%20technology%20(Tehran)&rft.au=Sadeghi,%20A.&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=9707&rft.epage=9716&rft.pages=9707-9716&rft.issn=1735-1472&rft.eissn=1735-2630&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13762-023-05081-7&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref_sprin%3E10_1007_s13762_023_05081_7%3C/crossref_sprin%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c242t-a3fc1fadb785f13b1aab1c48a94fd231f4aa216fb13666cb3b40231a6c99e6993%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |