Loading…

Mandatory Academic service learning and Continual Civic Engagement: Which Learning Outcomes Matter?

Using survey results from 805 alumni of a large public university in Hong Kong, this paper examines how alumni’s self-reported learning outcomes from a mandatory academic service learning program relate to their continual civic engagement in a multiple logistic regression framework. The findings rev...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Asia-Pacific education researcher 2024-09
Main Authors: Lin, Shuheng, Ngai, Grace, Kwan, Kam Por, Chan, Stephen C. F., Lo, Kenneth W. K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Using survey results from 805 alumni of a large public university in Hong Kong, this paper examines how alumni’s self-reported learning outcomes from a mandatory academic service learning program relate to their continual civic engagement in a multiple logistic regression framework. The findings reveal that more than two years after graduation, alumni maintained positive views of their experiences from the service learning program. They also reported having learned a fair amount or more in various domains, including intellectual, social, civic, and cross-cultural competency. Importantly, alumni who reported higher gains in civic learning were more likely to engage in post-graduation charitable donations and volunteering, while other learning outcomes were insignificant predictors. These findings remain robust even after controlling for alumni’s community service activities during college and views toward their service learning experience. This study underscores the importance of not assuming civic learning as an automatic outcome of service learning. Instead, civic learning should be explicitly and deliberately incorporated into students’ experiences for service learning to be an effective vehicle to increase and sustain civic engagement among university graduates.
ISSN:0119-5646
2243-7908
DOI:10.1007/s40299-024-00911-9