Loading…

Staff Opinions on the Most Positive and Negative Changes in Mental Health Services During the 2 Years of the Pandemic Emergency in Italy

This mixed-methods study investigated healthcare staff members’ opinions on the most positive and negative changes in mental health services (MHSs) during the 2-year COVID-19 pandemic emergency in Italy, and whether those changes differed by professional role and type of service. At the end of the n...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of psychosocial rehabilitation and mental health 2024-04
Main Authors: Magliano, Lorenza, Papa, Chiara, Di Maio, Ginevra, Bonavigo, Tommaso
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1572-ab73af08f63447d3249b27fa590936f29e12d552216fc1a9e1a817a1de35fdb93
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Journal of psychosocial rehabilitation and mental health
container_volume
creator Magliano, Lorenza
Papa, Chiara
Di Maio, Ginevra
Bonavigo, Tommaso
description This mixed-methods study investigated healthcare staff members’ opinions on the most positive and negative changes in mental health services (MHSs) during the 2-year COVID-19 pandemic emergency in Italy, and whether those changes differed by professional role and type of service. At the end of the national health emergency (March–April 2022), staff members from 17 MHSs completed the MHS Transformations Questionnaire, which includes a quantitative section with 30 multiple-choice items addressing positive changes and a qualitative section with two open-ended items on the most positive and negative changes. The 714 participants who responded to at least one open-ended item in the qualitative section formed the sample. Qualitative responses were categorised according to the textual content of the response and the themes of the quantitative section. Flexibility and Ability to Reinvent the Service was the subscale with the highest mean score. The most positive and negative changes fell into the following categories: practices (49.1 and 39%), organisation (34.5 and 36.9%), teamwork values (45.0 and 34.5%), and relationships with users and their families (31.9 and 40.6%). The most positive changes differed by type of service (i.e. in the relationship with users and their families category) and by professional role (i.e. in the practices and relationship with users and their families categories), whereas the most negative changes differed by type of service (i.e. in the practices category). The results may elucidate the complex experiences with the COVID-19 pandemic in MHSs and reveal lessons to be considered in post-pandemic service planning.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s40737-024-00406-2
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_s40737_024_00406_2</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1007_s40737_024_00406_2</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1572-ab73af08f63447d3249b27fa590936f29e12d552216fc1a9e1a817a1de35fdb93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kF1OwkAURidGEwmyAZ9mA9X5aTudR4MoJCAkaKJPzaW9U8bAlMxUEpbALlyLK7MUfbr35EvOwyHklrM7zpi6DzFTUkVMxBFjMUsjcUF6guss0ql8v_z_Mxlfk0EIn4wxnkilVdYjx2UDxtD5zjpbu0BrR5s10lkdGrqog23sHim4kr5gBR0M1-AqDNQ6OkPXwIaOETbNmi7R723RLo9f3rqq84if7w8E33pNx4tWhVtb0NEWfYWuOJw8k9ZyuCFXBjYBB3-3T96eRq_DcTSdP0-GD9Oo4IkSEayUBMMyk8o4VqUUsV4JZSDRTMvUCI1clEkiBE9NwaFFyLgCXqJMTLnSsk_E2Vv4OgSPJt95uwV_yDnLTz3zc8-87Zl3PXMhfwHd8mnW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Staff Opinions on the Most Positive and Negative Changes in Mental Health Services During the 2 Years of the Pandemic Emergency in Italy</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Magliano, Lorenza ; Papa, Chiara ; Di Maio, Ginevra ; Bonavigo, Tommaso</creator><creatorcontrib>Magliano, Lorenza ; Papa, Chiara ; Di Maio, Ginevra ; Bonavigo, Tommaso</creatorcontrib><description>This mixed-methods study investigated healthcare staff members’ opinions on the most positive and negative changes in mental health services (MHSs) during the 2-year COVID-19 pandemic emergency in Italy, and whether those changes differed by professional role and type of service. At the end of the national health emergency (March–April 2022), staff members from 17 MHSs completed the MHS Transformations Questionnaire, which includes a quantitative section with 30 multiple-choice items addressing positive changes and a qualitative section with two open-ended items on the most positive and negative changes. The 714 participants who responded to at least one open-ended item in the qualitative section formed the sample. Qualitative responses were categorised according to the textual content of the response and the themes of the quantitative section. Flexibility and Ability to Reinvent the Service was the subscale with the highest mean score. The most positive and negative changes fell into the following categories: practices (49.1 and 39%), organisation (34.5 and 36.9%), teamwork values (45.0 and 34.5%), and relationships with users and their families (31.9 and 40.6%). The most positive changes differed by type of service (i.e. in the relationship with users and their families category) and by professional role (i.e. in the practices and relationship with users and their families categories), whereas the most negative changes differed by type of service (i.e. in the practices category). The results may elucidate the complex experiences with the COVID-19 pandemic in MHSs and reveal lessons to be considered in post-pandemic service planning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2198-9834</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2198-963X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s40737-024-00406-2</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Journal of psychosocial rehabilitation and mental health, 2024-04</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1572-ab73af08f63447d3249b27fa590936f29e12d552216fc1a9e1a817a1de35fdb93</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4733-3975 ; 0009-0006-8228-8395 ; 0009-0002-2842-9549 ; 0000-0001-7539-9552</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Magliano, Lorenza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papa, Chiara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Maio, Ginevra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonavigo, Tommaso</creatorcontrib><title>Staff Opinions on the Most Positive and Negative Changes in Mental Health Services During the 2 Years of the Pandemic Emergency in Italy</title><title>Journal of psychosocial rehabilitation and mental health</title><description>This mixed-methods study investigated healthcare staff members’ opinions on the most positive and negative changes in mental health services (MHSs) during the 2-year COVID-19 pandemic emergency in Italy, and whether those changes differed by professional role and type of service. At the end of the national health emergency (March–April 2022), staff members from 17 MHSs completed the MHS Transformations Questionnaire, which includes a quantitative section with 30 multiple-choice items addressing positive changes and a qualitative section with two open-ended items on the most positive and negative changes. The 714 participants who responded to at least one open-ended item in the qualitative section formed the sample. Qualitative responses were categorised according to the textual content of the response and the themes of the quantitative section. Flexibility and Ability to Reinvent the Service was the subscale with the highest mean score. The most positive and negative changes fell into the following categories: practices (49.1 and 39%), organisation (34.5 and 36.9%), teamwork values (45.0 and 34.5%), and relationships with users and their families (31.9 and 40.6%). The most positive changes differed by type of service (i.e. in the relationship with users and their families category) and by professional role (i.e. in the practices and relationship with users and their families categories), whereas the most negative changes differed by type of service (i.e. in the practices category). The results may elucidate the complex experiences with the COVID-19 pandemic in MHSs and reveal lessons to be considered in post-pandemic service planning.</description><issn>2198-9834</issn><issn>2198-963X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1kF1OwkAURidGEwmyAZ9mA9X5aTudR4MoJCAkaKJPzaW9U8bAlMxUEpbALlyLK7MUfbr35EvOwyHklrM7zpi6DzFTUkVMxBFjMUsjcUF6guss0ql8v_z_Mxlfk0EIn4wxnkilVdYjx2UDxtD5zjpbu0BrR5s10lkdGrqog23sHim4kr5gBR0M1-AqDNQ6OkPXwIaOETbNmi7R723RLo9f3rqq84if7w8E33pNx4tWhVtb0NEWfYWuOJw8k9ZyuCFXBjYBB3-3T96eRq_DcTSdP0-GD9Oo4IkSEayUBMMyk8o4VqUUsV4JZSDRTMvUCI1clEkiBE9NwaFFyLgCXqJMTLnSsk_E2Vv4OgSPJt95uwV_yDnLTz3zc8-87Zl3PXMhfwHd8mnW</recordid><startdate>20240410</startdate><enddate>20240410</enddate><creator>Magliano, Lorenza</creator><creator>Papa, Chiara</creator><creator>Di Maio, Ginevra</creator><creator>Bonavigo, Tommaso</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4733-3975</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8228-8395</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2842-9549</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7539-9552</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240410</creationdate><title>Staff Opinions on the Most Positive and Negative Changes in Mental Health Services During the 2 Years of the Pandemic Emergency in Italy</title><author>Magliano, Lorenza ; Papa, Chiara ; Di Maio, Ginevra ; Bonavigo, Tommaso</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1572-ab73af08f63447d3249b27fa590936f29e12d552216fc1a9e1a817a1de35fdb93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Magliano, Lorenza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papa, Chiara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Maio, Ginevra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonavigo, Tommaso</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of psychosocial rehabilitation and mental health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Magliano, Lorenza</au><au>Papa, Chiara</au><au>Di Maio, Ginevra</au><au>Bonavigo, Tommaso</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Staff Opinions on the Most Positive and Negative Changes in Mental Health Services During the 2 Years of the Pandemic Emergency in Italy</atitle><jtitle>Journal of psychosocial rehabilitation and mental health</jtitle><date>2024-04-10</date><risdate>2024</risdate><issn>2198-9834</issn><eissn>2198-963X</eissn><abstract>This mixed-methods study investigated healthcare staff members’ opinions on the most positive and negative changes in mental health services (MHSs) during the 2-year COVID-19 pandemic emergency in Italy, and whether those changes differed by professional role and type of service. At the end of the national health emergency (March–April 2022), staff members from 17 MHSs completed the MHS Transformations Questionnaire, which includes a quantitative section with 30 multiple-choice items addressing positive changes and a qualitative section with two open-ended items on the most positive and negative changes. The 714 participants who responded to at least one open-ended item in the qualitative section formed the sample. Qualitative responses were categorised according to the textual content of the response and the themes of the quantitative section. Flexibility and Ability to Reinvent the Service was the subscale with the highest mean score. The most positive and negative changes fell into the following categories: practices (49.1 and 39%), organisation (34.5 and 36.9%), teamwork values (45.0 and 34.5%), and relationships with users and their families (31.9 and 40.6%). The most positive changes differed by type of service (i.e. in the relationship with users and their families category) and by professional role (i.e. in the practices and relationship with users and their families categories), whereas the most negative changes differed by type of service (i.e. in the practices category). The results may elucidate the complex experiences with the COVID-19 pandemic in MHSs and reveal lessons to be considered in post-pandemic service planning.</abstract><doi>10.1007/s40737-024-00406-2</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4733-3975</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8228-8395</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2842-9549</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7539-9552</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2198-9834
ispartof Journal of psychosocial rehabilitation and mental health, 2024-04
issn 2198-9834
2198-963X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_s40737_024_00406_2
source Springer Nature
title Staff Opinions on the Most Positive and Negative Changes in Mental Health Services During the 2 Years of the Pandemic Emergency in Italy
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T19%3A33%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Staff%20Opinions%20on%20the%20Most%20Positive%20and%20Negative%20Changes%20in%20Mental%20Health%20Services%20During%20the%202%C2%A0Years%20of%20the%20Pandemic%20Emergency%20in%20Italy&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20psychosocial%20rehabilitation%20and%20mental%20health&rft.au=Magliano,%20Lorenza&rft.date=2024-04-10&rft.issn=2198-9834&rft.eissn=2198-963X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s40737-024-00406-2&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1007_s40737_024_00406_2%3C/crossref%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1572-ab73af08f63447d3249b27fa590936f29e12d552216fc1a9e1a817a1de35fdb93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true