Loading…

Compatibility of the commercial biological control agents Trichoderma asperellum (ICC 012) and Trichoderma gamsii (ICC 080) with selected herbicides

The in vitro effects on mycelial growth of the antagonistic fungi Trichoderma asperellum (ICC 012) and Trichoderma gamsii (ICC 080) were studied based on the active ingredients of 12 commonly used herbicides: amidosulfuron, dicamba, fluazifop-P-butyl, fluorochloridone, foramsulfuron, isoxaflutole, m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of plant diseases and protection (2006) 2022-02, Vol.129 (1), p.85-92
Main Authors: Celar, Franci Aco, Kos, Katarina
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-4c2b9b23a7163a11c5113a01d74d75c49806a58134d202614c1f9dd205b51e113
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-4c2b9b23a7163a11c5113a01d74d75c49806a58134d202614c1f9dd205b51e113
container_end_page 92
container_issue 1
container_start_page 85
container_title Journal of plant diseases and protection (2006)
container_volume 129
creator Celar, Franci Aco
Kos, Katarina
description The in vitro effects on mycelial growth of the antagonistic fungi Trichoderma asperellum (ICC 012) and Trichoderma gamsii (ICC 080) were studied based on the active ingredients of 12 commonly used herbicides: amidosulfuron, dicamba, fluazifop-P-butyl, fluorochloridone, foramsulfuron, isoxaflutole, metribuzin, pendimethalin, prosulfocarb, pyridate, S-metolachlor and tembotrione. The fungal growth rates were evaluated at 20 °C and 25 °C using PDA plates that included 100%, 75%, 50%, 25%, 12.5%, 6.25% and 0% of the recommended herbicide application rates. These herbicides were classified into four categories based on inhibition of mycelial growth in the toxicity testing. Growth inhibition of Trichoderma spp. was seen for all of these herbicides at almost all doses and at both temperatures, although some major differences were seen. Lower herbicide concentrations in the agar also reduced the inhibitory effects, but generally not linearly. Temperature had no significant effects on the levels of inhibition of mycelial growth. Amidosulfuron, dicamba and isoxaflutole showed the least inhibition of mycelial growth of both Trichoderma spp., and the lowest doses with amidosulforone (6.25%, 12.5%) even significantly stimulated mycelial growth of both Trichoderma spp. Fluazifop-P-butyl, pyridate and tembotrione showed moderately harmful to harmful effects on mycelial growth, with 70% to 80% inhibition at the recommended herbicide application rates. Fluorochloridone, S-metolachlor, prosulfocarb, metribuzin and pendimethalin inhibited mycelial growth the most, in descending order of inhibition. At 50% to 100%, fluorochloridone, prosulfocarb and S-metolachlor had fungicidal effects. Fluorochloridone and prosulfocarb had significant inhibitory effects (> 75%) even at the lowest concentration of 6.25%. Of these herbicides tested, the least adverse effects were seen for amidosulfuron, dicamba and isoxaflutole, which are thus likely to be compatible with Trichoderma spp. in the field.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s41348-021-00547-7
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref_sprin</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_s41348_021_00547_7</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1007_s41348_021_00547_7</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-4c2b9b23a7163a11c5113a01d74d75c49806a58134d202614c1f9dd205b51e113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KAzEUhYMoWGpfwFWWdjGam_nJzFIGfwoFN3UdMklmmpKZlCRF-h4-sKkVwY2rexbfOVw-hG6B3AMh7CEUkBd1RihkhJQFy9gFmkFdQZbXObv8zbS5RosQdoScsKop6xn6bN24F9F0xpp4xK7HcauxdOOovTTC4s446wYjU5Ruit5ZLAY9xYA33sitU9qPAouw115bexjx3aptMQG6xGJSf6BBjMGYH6AmS_xh4hYHbbWMWuGt9p2RRulwg656YYNe_Nw5en9-2rSv2frtZdU-rjNJG4hZIWnXdDQXDKpcAMgSIBcEFCsUK2XR1KQSZZ3kKEpoBYWEvlEpl10JOrFzRM-70rsQvO753ptR-CMHwk9q-VktT2r5t1rOUik_l0KCp0F7vnMHP6U__2t9Aaude5c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Compatibility of the commercial biological control agents Trichoderma asperellum (ICC 012) and Trichoderma gamsii (ICC 080) with selected herbicides</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Celar, Franci Aco ; Kos, Katarina</creator><creatorcontrib>Celar, Franci Aco ; Kos, Katarina</creatorcontrib><description>The in vitro effects on mycelial growth of the antagonistic fungi Trichoderma asperellum (ICC 012) and Trichoderma gamsii (ICC 080) were studied based on the active ingredients of 12 commonly used herbicides: amidosulfuron, dicamba, fluazifop-P-butyl, fluorochloridone, foramsulfuron, isoxaflutole, metribuzin, pendimethalin, prosulfocarb, pyridate, S-metolachlor and tembotrione. The fungal growth rates were evaluated at 20 °C and 25 °C using PDA plates that included 100%, 75%, 50%, 25%, 12.5%, 6.25% and 0% of the recommended herbicide application rates. These herbicides were classified into four categories based on inhibition of mycelial growth in the toxicity testing. Growth inhibition of Trichoderma spp. was seen for all of these herbicides at almost all doses and at both temperatures, although some major differences were seen. Lower herbicide concentrations in the agar also reduced the inhibitory effects, but generally not linearly. Temperature had no significant effects on the levels of inhibition of mycelial growth. Amidosulfuron, dicamba and isoxaflutole showed the least inhibition of mycelial growth of both Trichoderma spp., and the lowest doses with amidosulforone (6.25%, 12.5%) even significantly stimulated mycelial growth of both Trichoderma spp. Fluazifop-P-butyl, pyridate and tembotrione showed moderately harmful to harmful effects on mycelial growth, with 70% to 80% inhibition at the recommended herbicide application rates. Fluorochloridone, S-metolachlor, prosulfocarb, metribuzin and pendimethalin inhibited mycelial growth the most, in descending order of inhibition. At 50% to 100%, fluorochloridone, prosulfocarb and S-metolachlor had fungicidal effects. Fluorochloridone and prosulfocarb had significant inhibitory effects (&gt; 75%) even at the lowest concentration of 6.25%. Of these herbicides tested, the least adverse effects were seen for amidosulfuron, dicamba and isoxaflutole, which are thus likely to be compatible with Trichoderma spp. in the field.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1861-3829</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1861-3837</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s41348-021-00547-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Life Sciences ; Original Article ; Plant Pathology ; Plant Physiology ; Plant Sciences</subject><ispartof>Journal of plant diseases and protection (2006), 2022-02, Vol.129 (1), p.85-92</ispartof><rights>Deutsche Phytomedizinische Gesellschaft 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-4c2b9b23a7163a11c5113a01d74d75c49806a58134d202614c1f9dd205b51e113</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-4c2b9b23a7163a11c5113a01d74d75c49806a58134d202614c1f9dd205b51e113</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8541-5923 ; 0000-0002-5805-6782</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Celar, Franci Aco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kos, Katarina</creatorcontrib><title>Compatibility of the commercial biological control agents Trichoderma asperellum (ICC 012) and Trichoderma gamsii (ICC 080) with selected herbicides</title><title>Journal of plant diseases and protection (2006)</title><addtitle>J Plant Dis Prot</addtitle><description>The in vitro effects on mycelial growth of the antagonistic fungi Trichoderma asperellum (ICC 012) and Trichoderma gamsii (ICC 080) were studied based on the active ingredients of 12 commonly used herbicides: amidosulfuron, dicamba, fluazifop-P-butyl, fluorochloridone, foramsulfuron, isoxaflutole, metribuzin, pendimethalin, prosulfocarb, pyridate, S-metolachlor and tembotrione. The fungal growth rates were evaluated at 20 °C and 25 °C using PDA plates that included 100%, 75%, 50%, 25%, 12.5%, 6.25% and 0% of the recommended herbicide application rates. These herbicides were classified into four categories based on inhibition of mycelial growth in the toxicity testing. Growth inhibition of Trichoderma spp. was seen for all of these herbicides at almost all doses and at both temperatures, although some major differences were seen. Lower herbicide concentrations in the agar also reduced the inhibitory effects, but generally not linearly. Temperature had no significant effects on the levels of inhibition of mycelial growth. Amidosulfuron, dicamba and isoxaflutole showed the least inhibition of mycelial growth of both Trichoderma spp., and the lowest doses with amidosulforone (6.25%, 12.5%) even significantly stimulated mycelial growth of both Trichoderma spp. Fluazifop-P-butyl, pyridate and tembotrione showed moderately harmful to harmful effects on mycelial growth, with 70% to 80% inhibition at the recommended herbicide application rates. Fluorochloridone, S-metolachlor, prosulfocarb, metribuzin and pendimethalin inhibited mycelial growth the most, in descending order of inhibition. At 50% to 100%, fluorochloridone, prosulfocarb and S-metolachlor had fungicidal effects. Fluorochloridone and prosulfocarb had significant inhibitory effects (&gt; 75%) even at the lowest concentration of 6.25%. Of these herbicides tested, the least adverse effects were seen for amidosulfuron, dicamba and isoxaflutole, which are thus likely to be compatible with Trichoderma spp. in the field.</description><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Plant Pathology</subject><subject>Plant Physiology</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><issn>1861-3829</issn><issn>1861-3837</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1KAzEUhYMoWGpfwFWWdjGam_nJzFIGfwoFN3UdMklmmpKZlCRF-h4-sKkVwY2rexbfOVw-hG6B3AMh7CEUkBd1RihkhJQFy9gFmkFdQZbXObv8zbS5RosQdoScsKop6xn6bN24F9F0xpp4xK7HcauxdOOovTTC4s446wYjU5Ruit5ZLAY9xYA33sitU9qPAouw115bexjx3aptMQG6xGJSf6BBjMGYH6AmS_xh4hYHbbWMWuGt9p2RRulwg656YYNe_Nw5en9-2rSv2frtZdU-rjNJG4hZIWnXdDQXDKpcAMgSIBcEFCsUK2XR1KQSZZ3kKEpoBYWEvlEpl10JOrFzRM-70rsQvO753ptR-CMHwk9q-VktT2r5t1rOUik_l0KCp0F7vnMHP6U__2t9Aaude5c</recordid><startdate>20220201</startdate><enddate>20220201</enddate><creator>Celar, Franci Aco</creator><creator>Kos, Katarina</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8541-5923</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5805-6782</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220201</creationdate><title>Compatibility of the commercial biological control agents Trichoderma asperellum (ICC 012) and Trichoderma gamsii (ICC 080) with selected herbicides</title><author>Celar, Franci Aco ; Kos, Katarina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-4c2b9b23a7163a11c5113a01d74d75c49806a58134d202614c1f9dd205b51e113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Plant Pathology</topic><topic>Plant Physiology</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Celar, Franci Aco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kos, Katarina</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of plant diseases and protection (2006)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Celar, Franci Aco</au><au>Kos, Katarina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Compatibility of the commercial biological control agents Trichoderma asperellum (ICC 012) and Trichoderma gamsii (ICC 080) with selected herbicides</atitle><jtitle>Journal of plant diseases and protection (2006)</jtitle><stitle>J Plant Dis Prot</stitle><date>2022-02-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>129</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>85</spage><epage>92</epage><pages>85-92</pages><issn>1861-3829</issn><eissn>1861-3837</eissn><abstract>The in vitro effects on mycelial growth of the antagonistic fungi Trichoderma asperellum (ICC 012) and Trichoderma gamsii (ICC 080) were studied based on the active ingredients of 12 commonly used herbicides: amidosulfuron, dicamba, fluazifop-P-butyl, fluorochloridone, foramsulfuron, isoxaflutole, metribuzin, pendimethalin, prosulfocarb, pyridate, S-metolachlor and tembotrione. The fungal growth rates were evaluated at 20 °C and 25 °C using PDA plates that included 100%, 75%, 50%, 25%, 12.5%, 6.25% and 0% of the recommended herbicide application rates. These herbicides were classified into four categories based on inhibition of mycelial growth in the toxicity testing. Growth inhibition of Trichoderma spp. was seen for all of these herbicides at almost all doses and at both temperatures, although some major differences were seen. Lower herbicide concentrations in the agar also reduced the inhibitory effects, but generally not linearly. Temperature had no significant effects on the levels of inhibition of mycelial growth. Amidosulfuron, dicamba and isoxaflutole showed the least inhibition of mycelial growth of both Trichoderma spp., and the lowest doses with amidosulforone (6.25%, 12.5%) even significantly stimulated mycelial growth of both Trichoderma spp. Fluazifop-P-butyl, pyridate and tembotrione showed moderately harmful to harmful effects on mycelial growth, with 70% to 80% inhibition at the recommended herbicide application rates. Fluorochloridone, S-metolachlor, prosulfocarb, metribuzin and pendimethalin inhibited mycelial growth the most, in descending order of inhibition. At 50% to 100%, fluorochloridone, prosulfocarb and S-metolachlor had fungicidal effects. Fluorochloridone and prosulfocarb had significant inhibitory effects (&gt; 75%) even at the lowest concentration of 6.25%. Of these herbicides tested, the least adverse effects were seen for amidosulfuron, dicamba and isoxaflutole, which are thus likely to be compatible with Trichoderma spp. in the field.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s41348-021-00547-7</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8541-5923</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5805-6782</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1861-3829
ispartof Journal of plant diseases and protection (2006), 2022-02, Vol.129 (1), p.85-92
issn 1861-3829
1861-3837
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_s41348_021_00547_7
source Springer Link
subjects Biomedical and Life Sciences
Life Sciences
Original Article
Plant Pathology
Plant Physiology
Plant Sciences
title Compatibility of the commercial biological control agents Trichoderma asperellum (ICC 012) and Trichoderma gamsii (ICC 080) with selected herbicides
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T10%3A37%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref_sprin&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Compatibility%20of%20the%20commercial%20biological%20control%20agents%20Trichoderma%20asperellum%20(ICC%20012)%20and%20Trichoderma%20gamsii%20(ICC%20080)%20with%20selected%20herbicides&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20plant%20diseases%20and%20protection%20(2006)&rft.au=Celar,%20Franci%20Aco&rft.date=2022-02-01&rft.volume=129&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=85&rft.epage=92&rft.pages=85-92&rft.issn=1861-3829&rft.eissn=1861-3837&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s41348-021-00547-7&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref_sprin%3E10_1007_s41348_021_00547_7%3C/crossref_sprin%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-4c2b9b23a7163a11c5113a01d74d75c49806a58134d202614c1f9dd205b51e113%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true