Loading…
Goods and Services Tax efficiency across Indian States: panel stochastic frontier analysis
In public finance, estimation of tax potential of a government—either federal or provincial—has immense importance to understand future streams of tax revenue. Tax potential depends on tax capacity and tax effort (TE) and, therefore, joint estimation of both the functions is desirable. There are sev...
Saved in:
Published in: | Indian economic review 2020-12, Vol.55 (2), p.225-251 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362z-cf2205ae5813b77513c4b8be6402be793bd77ca617e17b4849e8095288c60e303 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362z-cf2205ae5813b77513c4b8be6402be793bd77ca617e17b4849e8095288c60e303 |
container_end_page | 251 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 225 |
container_title | Indian economic review |
container_volume | 55 |
creator | Mukherjee, Sacchidananda |
description | In public finance, estimation of tax potential of a government—either federal or provincial—has immense importance to understand future streams of tax revenue. Tax potential depends on tax capacity and tax effort (TE) and, therefore, joint estimation of both the functions is desirable. There are several frameworks to estimate tax capacity and tax efficiency (tax effort); in the present paper, time-variant-truncated panel Stochastic Frontier Approach (SFA) is adopted to estimate the functions jointly for the period 2012–13 to 2019–20. The findings of the study could be useful for policy and especially for the sitting Fifteen Finance Commission. The results of the study show that GST capacity of states depends on size and structural composition of the economy. Introduction of GST has reduced states’ GST capacity and the impact is restricted to scale only. The study has used data from GST Network (GSTN) database for the post-GST period and given all other factors at their levels, GSTN data show lower GST capacity for high-income states and higher capacity for low-income states. The relationship between per capita income (PCI) of states and tax efficiency is non-linear and as PCI rises, TE falls and thereafter it rises. Minor states (special category states and UTs with legislative assembly) have lower tax efficiency. Delhi and Goa have the highest GST gap and on average major states could increase their GST collection by 0.52 percent of GSVA and minor states by 1.15% if they increase their tax efforts. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s41775-020-00097-z |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_s41775_020_00097_z</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48730406</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48730406</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362z-cf2205ae5813b77513c4b8be6402be793bd77ca617e17b4849e8095288c60e303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9j89KAzEQh4MouFZfQBDyAtHJn02yRynaFgoeWs8hm52VXXRXkiq2T2_sikdPwwzzzfw-Qq453HIAc5cUN6ZkIIABQGXY4YQUosxtnttTUgDwiilt4JxcpNQDlEpLURC9GMcmUT80dIPxswuY6NZ_UWzbLnQ4hD31IY4p0dXQdH6gm53fYbokZ61_TXj1W2fk-fFhO1-y9dNiNb9fsyC1OLDQCgGlx9JyWeeAXAZV2xq1AlGjqWTdGBO85ga5qZVVFVqoSmFt0IAS5IyI6e4xQ8TWvcfuzce94-B-zN1k7rK5O5q7Q4bkBKW8PLxgdP34EYec83_qZqL6tBvj3x9ljQQFWn4Dp0Jkrg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Goods and Services Tax efficiency across Indian States: panel stochastic frontier analysis</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Mukherjee, Sacchidananda</creator><creatorcontrib>Mukherjee, Sacchidananda</creatorcontrib><description>In public finance, estimation of tax potential of a government—either federal or provincial—has immense importance to understand future streams of tax revenue. Tax potential depends on tax capacity and tax effort (TE) and, therefore, joint estimation of both the functions is desirable. There are several frameworks to estimate tax capacity and tax efficiency (tax effort); in the present paper, time-variant-truncated panel Stochastic Frontier Approach (SFA) is adopted to estimate the functions jointly for the period 2012–13 to 2019–20. The findings of the study could be useful for policy and especially for the sitting Fifteen Finance Commission. The results of the study show that GST capacity of states depends on size and structural composition of the economy. Introduction of GST has reduced states’ GST capacity and the impact is restricted to scale only. The study has used data from GST Network (GSTN) database for the post-GST period and given all other factors at their levels, GSTN data show lower GST capacity for high-income states and higher capacity for low-income states. The relationship between per capita income (PCI) of states and tax efficiency is non-linear and as PCI rises, TE falls and thereafter it rises. Minor states (special category states and UTs with legislative assembly) have lower tax efficiency. Delhi and Goa have the highest GST gap and on average major states could increase their GST collection by 0.52 percent of GSVA and minor states by 1.15% if they increase their tax efforts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0019-4670</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2520-1778</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s41775-020-00097-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New Delhi: Springer Science + Business Media</publisher><subject>Econometrics ; Economic Policy ; Economics ; Economics and Finance</subject><ispartof>Indian economic review, 2020-12, Vol.55 (2), p.225-251</ispartof><rights>Editorial Office, Indian Economic Review 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362z-cf2205ae5813b77513c4b8be6402be793bd77ca617e17b4849e8095288c60e303</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362z-cf2205ae5813b77513c4b8be6402be793bd77ca617e17b4849e8095288c60e303</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7835-232X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48730406$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48730406$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,58213,58446</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mukherjee, Sacchidananda</creatorcontrib><title>Goods and Services Tax efficiency across Indian States: panel stochastic frontier analysis</title><title>Indian economic review</title><addtitle>Ind. Econ. Rev</addtitle><description>In public finance, estimation of tax potential of a government—either federal or provincial—has immense importance to understand future streams of tax revenue. Tax potential depends on tax capacity and tax effort (TE) and, therefore, joint estimation of both the functions is desirable. There are several frameworks to estimate tax capacity and tax efficiency (tax effort); in the present paper, time-variant-truncated panel Stochastic Frontier Approach (SFA) is adopted to estimate the functions jointly for the period 2012–13 to 2019–20. The findings of the study could be useful for policy and especially for the sitting Fifteen Finance Commission. The results of the study show that GST capacity of states depends on size and structural composition of the economy. Introduction of GST has reduced states’ GST capacity and the impact is restricted to scale only. The study has used data from GST Network (GSTN) database for the post-GST period and given all other factors at their levels, GSTN data show lower GST capacity for high-income states and higher capacity for low-income states. The relationship between per capita income (PCI) of states and tax efficiency is non-linear and as PCI rises, TE falls and thereafter it rises. Minor states (special category states and UTs with legislative assembly) have lower tax efficiency. Delhi and Goa have the highest GST gap and on average major states could increase their GST collection by 0.52 percent of GSVA and minor states by 1.15% if they increase their tax efforts.</description><subject>Econometrics</subject><subject>Economic Policy</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><issn>0019-4670</issn><issn>2520-1778</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9j89KAzEQh4MouFZfQBDyAtHJn02yRynaFgoeWs8hm52VXXRXkiq2T2_sikdPwwzzzfw-Qq453HIAc5cUN6ZkIIABQGXY4YQUosxtnttTUgDwiilt4JxcpNQDlEpLURC9GMcmUT80dIPxswuY6NZ_UWzbLnQ4hD31IY4p0dXQdH6gm53fYbokZ61_TXj1W2fk-fFhO1-y9dNiNb9fsyC1OLDQCgGlx9JyWeeAXAZV2xq1AlGjqWTdGBO85ga5qZVVFVqoSmFt0IAS5IyI6e4xQ8TWvcfuzce94-B-zN1k7rK5O5q7Q4bkBKW8PLxgdP34EYec83_qZqL6tBvj3x9ljQQFWn4Dp0Jkrg</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>Mukherjee, Sacchidananda</creator><general>Springer Science + Business Media</general><general>Springer India</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7835-232X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>Goods and Services Tax efficiency across Indian States</title><author>Mukherjee, Sacchidananda</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362z-cf2205ae5813b77513c4b8be6402be793bd77ca617e17b4849e8095288c60e303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Econometrics</topic><topic>Economic Policy</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mukherjee, Sacchidananda</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Indian economic review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mukherjee, Sacchidananda</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Goods and Services Tax efficiency across Indian States: panel stochastic frontier analysis</atitle><jtitle>Indian economic review</jtitle><stitle>Ind. Econ. Rev</stitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>225</spage><epage>251</epage><pages>225-251</pages><issn>0019-4670</issn><eissn>2520-1778</eissn><abstract>In public finance, estimation of tax potential of a government—either federal or provincial—has immense importance to understand future streams of tax revenue. Tax potential depends on tax capacity and tax effort (TE) and, therefore, joint estimation of both the functions is desirable. There are several frameworks to estimate tax capacity and tax efficiency (tax effort); in the present paper, time-variant-truncated panel Stochastic Frontier Approach (SFA) is adopted to estimate the functions jointly for the period 2012–13 to 2019–20. The findings of the study could be useful for policy and especially for the sitting Fifteen Finance Commission. The results of the study show that GST capacity of states depends on size and structural composition of the economy. Introduction of GST has reduced states’ GST capacity and the impact is restricted to scale only. The study has used data from GST Network (GSTN) database for the post-GST period and given all other factors at their levels, GSTN data show lower GST capacity for high-income states and higher capacity for low-income states. The relationship between per capita income (PCI) of states and tax efficiency is non-linear and as PCI rises, TE falls and thereafter it rises. Minor states (special category states and UTs with legislative assembly) have lower tax efficiency. Delhi and Goa have the highest GST gap and on average major states could increase their GST collection by 0.52 percent of GSVA and minor states by 1.15% if they increase their tax efforts.</abstract><cop>New Delhi</cop><pub>Springer Science + Business Media</pub><doi>10.1007/s41775-020-00097-z</doi><tpages>27</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7835-232X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0019-4670 |
ispartof | Indian economic review, 2020-12, Vol.55 (2), p.225-251 |
issn | 0019-4670 2520-1778 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_s41775_020_00097_z |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Springer Nature |
subjects | Econometrics Economic Policy Economics Economics and Finance |
title | Goods and Services Tax efficiency across Indian States: panel stochastic frontier analysis |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T02%3A59%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Goods%20and%20Services%20Tax%20efficiency%20across%20Indian%20States:%20panel%20stochastic%20frontier%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Indian%20economic%20review&rft.au=Mukherjee,%20Sacchidananda&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=225&rft.epage=251&rft.pages=225-251&rft.issn=0019-4670&rft.eissn=2520-1778&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s41775-020-00097-z&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E48730406%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362z-cf2205ae5813b77513c4b8be6402be793bd77ca617e17b4849e8095288c60e303%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=48730406&rfr_iscdi=true |