Loading…
Different but the Same? Comparing Drivers and Barriers for Circular Economy Innovation Systems in Wood- and Plastic-Based Industries
Circular economy is an emerging concept that places an emphasis on strategies (e.g., reduce, reuse, recycle) to decouple resource use from economic growth, minimize waste and emissions, and maintain the highest utility along a product life cycle. The transition to a circular economy requires innovat...
Saved in:
Published in: | Circular economy and sustainability (Online) 2023-06, Vol.3 (2), p.983-1011 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2509-55509fd2dfb1a5df794ecf75ca0437ee1f4f4c390810174f89aa6cd6997d22c33 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2509-55509fd2dfb1a5df794ecf75ca0437ee1f4f4c390810174f89aa6cd6997d22c33 |
container_end_page | 1011 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 983 |
container_title | Circular economy and sustainability (Online) |
container_volume | 3 |
creator | Holzer, Daniel Mair-Bauernfeind, Claudia Kriechbaum, Michael Rauter, Romana Stern, Tobias |
description | Circular economy is an emerging concept that places an emphasis on strategies (e.g., reduce, reuse, recycle) to decouple resource use from economic growth, minimize waste and emissions, and maintain the highest utility along a product life cycle. The transition to a circular economy requires innovative solutions along entire value chains. This literature review was carried out to investigate the respective innovation systems that emerge along the wood-based and plastic-based value chains. To investigate different barriers to and drivers for the transition to a circular economy, the system functions of the technological innovation system framework were used. The results reveal that the two sectors hold different strategic positions and that barriers are dominant in the innovation system for plastics, while drivers are more prevalent in the innovation system for wood. This study is one of the first to direct a focus toward different industrial origins and their underlying logic, contributing to a better overall understanding of the circular economy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s43615-022-00210-9 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref_sprin</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_s43615_022_00210_9</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1007_s43615_022_00210_9</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2509-55509fd2dfb1a5df794ecf75ca0437ee1f4f4c390810174f89aa6cd6997d22c33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoWGpfwFVeIJrLTDNZiZ1WLRQUqugupLloSicpyUyhex_caSsu3ZwL_N_h8AFwTfANwZjf5oKNSYkwpQhjSjASZ2BAOcOoFFV1_jfzj0swynmN-xQnmDI8AN9T75xNNrRw1bWw_bJwqRp7B-vYbFXy4RNOk9_ZlKEKBk5USv6wuJhg7ZPuNirBmY4hNns4DyHuVOtjgMt9bm2ToQ_wPUaDjvTLRuXWazRR2Zo-bbrc9ufyFbhwapPt6LcPwdvD7LV-Qovnx3l9v0CalligsuyrM9S4FVGlcVwUVjteaoULxq0lrnCFZgJXBBNeuEooNdZmLAQ3lGrGhoCe7uoUc07WyW3yjUp7SbA8qJQnlbJXKY8qpeghdoLy9qDDJrmOXQr9n_9RP47FeFU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Different but the Same? Comparing Drivers and Barriers for Circular Economy Innovation Systems in Wood- and Plastic-Based Industries</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Holzer, Daniel ; Mair-Bauernfeind, Claudia ; Kriechbaum, Michael ; Rauter, Romana ; Stern, Tobias</creator><creatorcontrib>Holzer, Daniel ; Mair-Bauernfeind, Claudia ; Kriechbaum, Michael ; Rauter, Romana ; Stern, Tobias</creatorcontrib><description>Circular economy is an emerging concept that places an emphasis on strategies (e.g., reduce, reuse, recycle) to decouple resource use from economic growth, minimize waste and emissions, and maintain the highest utility along a product life cycle. The transition to a circular economy requires innovative solutions along entire value chains. This literature review was carried out to investigate the respective innovation systems that emerge along the wood-based and plastic-based value chains. To investigate different barriers to and drivers for the transition to a circular economy, the system functions of the technological innovation system framework were used. The results reveal that the two sectors hold different strategic positions and that barriers are dominant in the innovation system for plastics, while drivers are more prevalent in the innovation system for wood. This study is one of the first to direct a focus toward different industrial origins and their underlying logic, contributing to a better overall understanding of the circular economy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2730-597X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2730-5988</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s43615-022-00210-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Applied Science ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Engineering Economics ; Environment ; Environmental Economics ; Logistics ; Marketing ; multidisciplinary ; Organization ; Review Paper ; Science ; Sustainable Development ; Waste Management/Waste Technology</subject><ispartof>Circular economy and sustainability (Online), 2023-06, Vol.3 (2), p.983-1011</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2509-55509fd2dfb1a5df794ecf75ca0437ee1f4f4c390810174f89aa6cd6997d22c33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2509-55509fd2dfb1a5df794ecf75ca0437ee1f4f4c390810174f89aa6cd6997d22c33</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1749-0731</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Holzer, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mair-Bauernfeind, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kriechbaum, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rauter, Romana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stern, Tobias</creatorcontrib><title>Different but the Same? Comparing Drivers and Barriers for Circular Economy Innovation Systems in Wood- and Plastic-Based Industries</title><title>Circular economy and sustainability (Online)</title><addtitle>Circ.Econ.Sust</addtitle><description>Circular economy is an emerging concept that places an emphasis on strategies (e.g., reduce, reuse, recycle) to decouple resource use from economic growth, minimize waste and emissions, and maintain the highest utility along a product life cycle. The transition to a circular economy requires innovative solutions along entire value chains. This literature review was carried out to investigate the respective innovation systems that emerge along the wood-based and plastic-based value chains. To investigate different barriers to and drivers for the transition to a circular economy, the system functions of the technological innovation system framework were used. The results reveal that the two sectors hold different strategic positions and that barriers are dominant in the innovation system for plastics, while drivers are more prevalent in the innovation system for wood. This study is one of the first to direct a focus toward different industrial origins and their underlying logic, contributing to a better overall understanding of the circular economy.</description><subject>Applied Science</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Engineering Economics</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Economics</subject><subject>Logistics</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Organization</subject><subject>Review Paper</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Sustainable Development</subject><subject>Waste Management/Waste Technology</subject><issn>2730-597X</issn><issn>2730-5988</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoWGpfwFVeIJrLTDNZiZ1WLRQUqugupLloSicpyUyhex_caSsu3ZwL_N_h8AFwTfANwZjf5oKNSYkwpQhjSjASZ2BAOcOoFFV1_jfzj0swynmN-xQnmDI8AN9T75xNNrRw1bWw_bJwqRp7B-vYbFXy4RNOk9_ZlKEKBk5USv6wuJhg7ZPuNirBmY4hNns4DyHuVOtjgMt9bm2ToQ_wPUaDjvTLRuXWazRR2Zo-bbrc9ufyFbhwapPt6LcPwdvD7LV-Qovnx3l9v0CalligsuyrM9S4FVGlcVwUVjteaoULxq0lrnCFZgJXBBNeuEooNdZmLAQ3lGrGhoCe7uoUc07WyW3yjUp7SbA8qJQnlbJXKY8qpeghdoLy9qDDJrmOXQr9n_9RP47FeFU</recordid><startdate>20230601</startdate><enddate>20230601</enddate><creator>Holzer, Daniel</creator><creator>Mair-Bauernfeind, Claudia</creator><creator>Kriechbaum, Michael</creator><creator>Rauter, Romana</creator><creator>Stern, Tobias</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1749-0731</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230601</creationdate><title>Different but the Same? Comparing Drivers and Barriers for Circular Economy Innovation Systems in Wood- and Plastic-Based Industries</title><author>Holzer, Daniel ; Mair-Bauernfeind, Claudia ; Kriechbaum, Michael ; Rauter, Romana ; Stern, Tobias</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2509-55509fd2dfb1a5df794ecf75ca0437ee1f4f4c390810174f89aa6cd6997d22c33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Applied Science</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Engineering Economics</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Economics</topic><topic>Logistics</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Organization</topic><topic>Review Paper</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Sustainable Development</topic><topic>Waste Management/Waste Technology</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Holzer, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mair-Bauernfeind, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kriechbaum, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rauter, Romana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stern, Tobias</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Circular economy and sustainability (Online)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Holzer, Daniel</au><au>Mair-Bauernfeind, Claudia</au><au>Kriechbaum, Michael</au><au>Rauter, Romana</au><au>Stern, Tobias</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Different but the Same? Comparing Drivers and Barriers for Circular Economy Innovation Systems in Wood- and Plastic-Based Industries</atitle><jtitle>Circular economy and sustainability (Online)</jtitle><stitle>Circ.Econ.Sust</stitle><date>2023-06-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>983</spage><epage>1011</epage><pages>983-1011</pages><issn>2730-597X</issn><eissn>2730-5988</eissn><abstract>Circular economy is an emerging concept that places an emphasis on strategies (e.g., reduce, reuse, recycle) to decouple resource use from economic growth, minimize waste and emissions, and maintain the highest utility along a product life cycle. The transition to a circular economy requires innovative solutions along entire value chains. This literature review was carried out to investigate the respective innovation systems that emerge along the wood-based and plastic-based value chains. To investigate different barriers to and drivers for the transition to a circular economy, the system functions of the technological innovation system framework were used. The results reveal that the two sectors hold different strategic positions and that barriers are dominant in the innovation system for plastics, while drivers are more prevalent in the innovation system for wood. This study is one of the first to direct a focus toward different industrial origins and their underlying logic, contributing to a better overall understanding of the circular economy.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s43615-022-00210-9</doi><tpages>29</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1749-0731</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2730-597X |
ispartof | Circular economy and sustainability (Online), 2023-06, Vol.3 (2), p.983-1011 |
issn | 2730-597X 2730-5988 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_s43615_022_00210_9 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Applied Science Earth and Environmental Science Engineering Economics Environment Environmental Economics Logistics Marketing multidisciplinary Organization Review Paper Science Sustainable Development Waste Management/Waste Technology |
title | Different but the Same? Comparing Drivers and Barriers for Circular Economy Innovation Systems in Wood- and Plastic-Based Industries |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T09%3A35%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref_sprin&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Different%20but%20the%20Same?%20Comparing%20Drivers%20and%20Barriers%20for%20Circular%20Economy%20Innovation%20Systems%20in%20Wood-%20and%20Plastic-Based%20Industries&rft.jtitle=Circular%20economy%20and%20sustainability%20(Online)&rft.au=Holzer,%20Daniel&rft.date=2023-06-01&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=983&rft.epage=1011&rft.pages=983-1011&rft.issn=2730-597X&rft.eissn=2730-5988&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s43615-022-00210-9&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref_sprin%3E10_1007_s43615_022_00210_9%3C/crossref_sprin%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2509-55509fd2dfb1a5df794ecf75ca0437ee1f4f4c390810174f89aa6cd6997d22c33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |