Loading…

Different but the Same? Comparing Drivers and Barriers for Circular Economy Innovation Systems in Wood- and Plastic-Based Industries

Circular economy is an emerging concept that places an emphasis on strategies (e.g., reduce, reuse, recycle) to decouple resource use from economic growth, minimize waste and emissions, and maintain the highest utility along a product life cycle. The transition to a circular economy requires innovat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Circular economy and sustainability (Online) 2023-06, Vol.3 (2), p.983-1011
Main Authors: Holzer, Daniel, Mair-Bauernfeind, Claudia, Kriechbaum, Michael, Rauter, Romana, Stern, Tobias
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2509-55509fd2dfb1a5df794ecf75ca0437ee1f4f4c390810174f89aa6cd6997d22c33
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2509-55509fd2dfb1a5df794ecf75ca0437ee1f4f4c390810174f89aa6cd6997d22c33
container_end_page 1011
container_issue 2
container_start_page 983
container_title Circular economy and sustainability (Online)
container_volume 3
creator Holzer, Daniel
Mair-Bauernfeind, Claudia
Kriechbaum, Michael
Rauter, Romana
Stern, Tobias
description Circular economy is an emerging concept that places an emphasis on strategies (e.g., reduce, reuse, recycle) to decouple resource use from economic growth, minimize waste and emissions, and maintain the highest utility along a product life cycle. The transition to a circular economy requires innovative solutions along entire value chains. This literature review was carried out to investigate the respective innovation systems that emerge along the wood-based and plastic-based value chains. To investigate different barriers to and drivers for the transition to a circular economy, the system functions of the technological innovation system framework were used. The results reveal that the two sectors hold different strategic positions and that barriers are dominant in the innovation system for plastics, while drivers are more prevalent in the innovation system for wood. This study is one of the first to direct a focus toward different industrial origins and their underlying logic, contributing to a better overall understanding of the circular economy.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s43615-022-00210-9
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref_sprin</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_s43615_022_00210_9</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1007_s43615_022_00210_9</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2509-55509fd2dfb1a5df794ecf75ca0437ee1f4f4c390810174f89aa6cd6997d22c33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoWGpfwFVeIJrLTDNZiZ1WLRQUqugupLloSicpyUyhex_caSsu3ZwL_N_h8AFwTfANwZjf5oKNSYkwpQhjSjASZ2BAOcOoFFV1_jfzj0swynmN-xQnmDI8AN9T75xNNrRw1bWw_bJwqRp7B-vYbFXy4RNOk9_ZlKEKBk5USv6wuJhg7ZPuNirBmY4hNns4DyHuVOtjgMt9bm2ToQ_wPUaDjvTLRuXWazRR2Zo-bbrc9ufyFbhwapPt6LcPwdvD7LV-Qovnx3l9v0CalligsuyrM9S4FVGlcVwUVjteaoULxq0lrnCFZgJXBBNeuEooNdZmLAQ3lGrGhoCe7uoUc07WyW3yjUp7SbA8qJQnlbJXKY8qpeghdoLy9qDDJrmOXQr9n_9RP47FeFU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Different but the Same? Comparing Drivers and Barriers for Circular Economy Innovation Systems in Wood- and Plastic-Based Industries</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Holzer, Daniel ; Mair-Bauernfeind, Claudia ; Kriechbaum, Michael ; Rauter, Romana ; Stern, Tobias</creator><creatorcontrib>Holzer, Daniel ; Mair-Bauernfeind, Claudia ; Kriechbaum, Michael ; Rauter, Romana ; Stern, Tobias</creatorcontrib><description>Circular economy is an emerging concept that places an emphasis on strategies (e.g., reduce, reuse, recycle) to decouple resource use from economic growth, minimize waste and emissions, and maintain the highest utility along a product life cycle. The transition to a circular economy requires innovative solutions along entire value chains. This literature review was carried out to investigate the respective innovation systems that emerge along the wood-based and plastic-based value chains. To investigate different barriers to and drivers for the transition to a circular economy, the system functions of the technological innovation system framework were used. The results reveal that the two sectors hold different strategic positions and that barriers are dominant in the innovation system for plastics, while drivers are more prevalent in the innovation system for wood. This study is one of the first to direct a focus toward different industrial origins and their underlying logic, contributing to a better overall understanding of the circular economy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2730-597X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2730-5988</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s43615-022-00210-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Applied Science ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Engineering Economics ; Environment ; Environmental Economics ; Logistics ; Marketing ; multidisciplinary ; Organization ; Review Paper ; Science ; Sustainable Development ; Waste Management/Waste Technology</subject><ispartof>Circular economy and sustainability (Online), 2023-06, Vol.3 (2), p.983-1011</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2509-55509fd2dfb1a5df794ecf75ca0437ee1f4f4c390810174f89aa6cd6997d22c33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2509-55509fd2dfb1a5df794ecf75ca0437ee1f4f4c390810174f89aa6cd6997d22c33</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1749-0731</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Holzer, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mair-Bauernfeind, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kriechbaum, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rauter, Romana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stern, Tobias</creatorcontrib><title>Different but the Same? Comparing Drivers and Barriers for Circular Economy Innovation Systems in Wood- and Plastic-Based Industries</title><title>Circular economy and sustainability (Online)</title><addtitle>Circ.Econ.Sust</addtitle><description>Circular economy is an emerging concept that places an emphasis on strategies (e.g., reduce, reuse, recycle) to decouple resource use from economic growth, minimize waste and emissions, and maintain the highest utility along a product life cycle. The transition to a circular economy requires innovative solutions along entire value chains. This literature review was carried out to investigate the respective innovation systems that emerge along the wood-based and plastic-based value chains. To investigate different barriers to and drivers for the transition to a circular economy, the system functions of the technological innovation system framework were used. The results reveal that the two sectors hold different strategic positions and that barriers are dominant in the innovation system for plastics, while drivers are more prevalent in the innovation system for wood. This study is one of the first to direct a focus toward different industrial origins and their underlying logic, contributing to a better overall understanding of the circular economy.</description><subject>Applied Science</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Engineering Economics</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Economics</subject><subject>Logistics</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Organization</subject><subject>Review Paper</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Sustainable Development</subject><subject>Waste Management/Waste Technology</subject><issn>2730-597X</issn><issn>2730-5988</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoWGpfwFVeIJrLTDNZiZ1WLRQUqugupLloSicpyUyhex_caSsu3ZwL_N_h8AFwTfANwZjf5oKNSYkwpQhjSjASZ2BAOcOoFFV1_jfzj0swynmN-xQnmDI8AN9T75xNNrRw1bWw_bJwqRp7B-vYbFXy4RNOk9_ZlKEKBk5USv6wuJhg7ZPuNirBmY4hNns4DyHuVOtjgMt9bm2ToQ_wPUaDjvTLRuXWazRR2Zo-bbrc9ufyFbhwapPt6LcPwdvD7LV-Qovnx3l9v0CalligsuyrM9S4FVGlcVwUVjteaoULxq0lrnCFZgJXBBNeuEooNdZmLAQ3lGrGhoCe7uoUc07WyW3yjUp7SbA8qJQnlbJXKY8qpeghdoLy9qDDJrmOXQr9n_9RP47FeFU</recordid><startdate>20230601</startdate><enddate>20230601</enddate><creator>Holzer, Daniel</creator><creator>Mair-Bauernfeind, Claudia</creator><creator>Kriechbaum, Michael</creator><creator>Rauter, Romana</creator><creator>Stern, Tobias</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1749-0731</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230601</creationdate><title>Different but the Same? Comparing Drivers and Barriers for Circular Economy Innovation Systems in Wood- and Plastic-Based Industries</title><author>Holzer, Daniel ; Mair-Bauernfeind, Claudia ; Kriechbaum, Michael ; Rauter, Romana ; Stern, Tobias</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2509-55509fd2dfb1a5df794ecf75ca0437ee1f4f4c390810174f89aa6cd6997d22c33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Applied Science</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Engineering Economics</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Economics</topic><topic>Logistics</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Organization</topic><topic>Review Paper</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Sustainable Development</topic><topic>Waste Management/Waste Technology</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Holzer, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mair-Bauernfeind, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kriechbaum, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rauter, Romana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stern, Tobias</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Circular economy and sustainability (Online)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Holzer, Daniel</au><au>Mair-Bauernfeind, Claudia</au><au>Kriechbaum, Michael</au><au>Rauter, Romana</au><au>Stern, Tobias</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Different but the Same? Comparing Drivers and Barriers for Circular Economy Innovation Systems in Wood- and Plastic-Based Industries</atitle><jtitle>Circular economy and sustainability (Online)</jtitle><stitle>Circ.Econ.Sust</stitle><date>2023-06-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>983</spage><epage>1011</epage><pages>983-1011</pages><issn>2730-597X</issn><eissn>2730-5988</eissn><abstract>Circular economy is an emerging concept that places an emphasis on strategies (e.g., reduce, reuse, recycle) to decouple resource use from economic growth, minimize waste and emissions, and maintain the highest utility along a product life cycle. The transition to a circular economy requires innovative solutions along entire value chains. This literature review was carried out to investigate the respective innovation systems that emerge along the wood-based and plastic-based value chains. To investigate different barriers to and drivers for the transition to a circular economy, the system functions of the technological innovation system framework were used. The results reveal that the two sectors hold different strategic positions and that barriers are dominant in the innovation system for plastics, while drivers are more prevalent in the innovation system for wood. This study is one of the first to direct a focus toward different industrial origins and their underlying logic, contributing to a better overall understanding of the circular economy.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s43615-022-00210-9</doi><tpages>29</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1749-0731</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2730-597X
ispartof Circular economy and sustainability (Online), 2023-06, Vol.3 (2), p.983-1011
issn 2730-597X
2730-5988
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_s43615_022_00210_9
source Springer Nature
subjects Applied Science
Earth and Environmental Science
Engineering Economics
Environment
Environmental Economics
Logistics
Marketing
multidisciplinary
Organization
Review Paper
Science
Sustainable Development
Waste Management/Waste Technology
title Different but the Same? Comparing Drivers and Barriers for Circular Economy Innovation Systems in Wood- and Plastic-Based Industries
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T09%3A35%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref_sprin&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Different%20but%20the%20Same?%20Comparing%20Drivers%20and%20Barriers%20for%20Circular%20Economy%20Innovation%20Systems%20in%20Wood-%20and%20Plastic-Based%20Industries&rft.jtitle=Circular%20economy%20and%20sustainability%20(Online)&rft.au=Holzer,%20Daniel&rft.date=2023-06-01&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=983&rft.epage=1011&rft.pages=983-1011&rft.issn=2730-597X&rft.eissn=2730-5988&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s43615-022-00210-9&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref_sprin%3E10_1007_s43615_022_00210_9%3C/crossref_sprin%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2509-55509fd2dfb1a5df794ecf75ca0437ee1f4f4c390810174f89aa6cd6997d22c33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true