A comment on “analysis of video image sequences using point and line correspondences”

In this paper we would like to contest the results of Y. F. Wang, N. Karandikar and J. K. Aggarwal [ Pattern Recognition 24, 1065–1085 (1991)] raising two fundamental claims. • • A line does not contribute anything to recognition of motion parameters from two images. • • Four...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Pattern recognition 1995, Vol.28 (2), p.283-292
Main Author: Klopotek, Mieczyslaw A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Applied sciences
Artificial intelligence
Computer science
control theory
systems
Exact sciences and technology
Line
Motion
Pattern recognition. Digital image processing. Computational geometry
Point
Structure
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In this paper we would like to contest the results of Y. F. Wang, N. Karandikar and J. K. Aggarwal [ Pattern Recognition 24, 1065–1085 (1991)] raising two fundamental claims. • • A line does not contribute anything to recognition of motion parameters from two images. • • Four traceable points are not sufficient to recover motion parameters from two perspective projections. To be constructive, however, we show that four traceable points are sufficient to recover motion parameters from two frames under orthogonal projection and that five points are sufficient to simplify the solution of the two-frame problem under orthogonal projection to solving a linear equation system.
ISSN:0031-3203
1873-5142
DOI:10.1016/0031-3203(94)00096-5