Loading…
3894 Prospective study of the ability of endoscopic ultrasound to localize duodenal gastrinomas
The role of EUS in localizing duodenal gastrinomas remains controversial because of lack of prospective assessments. To address this question we prospectively studied 40 consecutive patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES) admitted to the NIH prior to surgery. All patients had conventional ima...
Saved in:
Published in: | Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2000-04, Vol.51 (4), p.AB139-AB139 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The role of EUS in localizing duodenal gastrinomas remains controversial because of lack of prospective assessments. To address this question we prospectively studied 40 consecutive patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES) admitted to the NIH prior to surgery. All patients had conventional imaging studies (CT, MRI, ultrasound, angiography), somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS), EUS (Olympus UM 20), catheter US [UM3R] with endoscopy [side-viewing endoscope-(TJF)] (CUS.Endo), followed by a standardized laparotomy with a Kocher maneuver, intra-operative ultrasound and duodenotomy. Seven patients had MEN-1 and ZES and 33 had sporadic ZES. Prior to surgery, at least one nonEUS imaging study localized a possible duodenal gastrinoma in 19 patients (48%); conventional imaging only in 28%; SRS in 42%; EUS alone, 35%; CUS.Endo, 45%; and EUS or CUS.Endo, 52%. At exploration duodenal gastrinomas were found in 18 patients (45%). EUS, CUS.Endo, both (EUS and CUS.Endo), and any other imaging (other imaging) had sensitivities of 47%, 64%, 71% and 61% and specificities of 65%, 58%, 52% and 64%, respectively. In the 8 patients with all other imaging negative with a duodenal gastrinoma, EUS was positive in 50% (4/8), CUS.Endo in 38%, or either in 62%. In the 22 patients without a duodenal gastrinoma a false positive localization occurred with EUS in 5/22 (23%); CUS.Endo in 32%; both, 36%; and with other imaging in 36%. The sensitivity of SRS alone for localizing a duodenal tumor was 56%; SRS + EUS, 83%; SRS + CUS.Endo, 83%; and SRS + both, 88%. These results demonstrate that EUS alone will localize 47% of duodenal gastrinomas, which is slightly less than the 61% seen with a combination of other imaging studies. However, if combined with careful endoscopy using a side-viewing endoscope and catheter ultrasound, it will localize 71%. Both procedures are complementary to SRS, correctly localizing a duodenal gastrinoma in 88% of patients; however, the combination of both endoscopic procedures also increases the false positive rate and decreases the specificity. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0016-5107 1097-6779 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0016-5107(00)14304-4 |