Loading…
A combined density functional theory/molecular mechanics formalism and its application to small water clusters
We present a study of the conformations of the water dimer, trimer and tetramer using a combined density functional theory/molecular mechanics method (DFT/MM). Both local density approximation (LDA) and non-local density functional (NLDF) calculations are reported, employing two basis sets (polarize...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of molecular structure 1997-07, Vol.412 (1), p.121-133 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | We present a study of the conformations of the water dimer, trimer and tetramer using a combined density functional theory/molecular mechanics method (DFT/MM). Both local density approximation (LDA) and non-local density functional (NLDF) calculations are reported, employing two basis sets (polarized valence double zeta (DZVP) and augmented correlation consistent polarized valence double zeta (aug-cc-pVDZ)). In comparing the optimized geometries and the binding energy from the DFT/MM calculations with those derived from pure DFT and previous MP2 treatments, we find that an NLDF calculation is required to derive energetics which match the MP2 results. In all the cases studied, LDA is found to overestimate the binding energy and underestimate the oxygen–oxygen bond lengths (
R(O–O)) between two hydrogen-bonded water molecules. We attribute this to the importance of an NL description of hydrogen bonds, as previously found by other researchers. For the combined DFT/MM calculations, the situation is more complicated. While the MM term is, of course, not sensitive to NLDF, the DFT component of a partitioned DFT/MM system exhibits the same sensitivity as the pure DFT to NLDF, while the DFT/MM coupling term is less sensitive. The sensitivities of the DFT and DFT/MM calculations to the basis set are similar to the NLDF case. In all cases, the aug-cc-DZVP gives longer
R(O–O) values and higher (less negative) binding energies than DZVP, but underestimates the binding energy when the H bond(s) exist(s) in the DFT region. The DFT/MM coupling term is found to be dependent on the initial geometry to some extent. In summary, the DFT/MM calculations with properly selected basis sets and NLDF give energetics and geometric information which compare favorably with MP2 results. © 1997 Elsevier Science B.V. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-2860 1872-8014 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0022-2860(96)09453-7 |