Evaluation of the protective efficacy of Actinohacillus pleuropneumoniae serotype 1 detoxified lipopolysaccharides or O-polysaccharide-protein conjugate in pigs

• Published in: Research in veterinary science 1998-09, Vol.65 (2), p.165-167
• Main Authors: Rioux, Stéphane, Girard, Christiane, Dubreuil, J.Daniel, Jacques, Mario
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• ISSN: 0034-5288; 1532-2661
• DOI: 10.1016/S0034-5288(98)90170-9

The major adhesin of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, the causative agent of porcine pleuropneumonia, has been previously identified as the lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Experiments in our laboratory have shown that mice immunised with different A pleuropneumoniae serotype 1 LPS preparations were protected against a challenge with a virulent A pleuropneumoniae serotype 1 isolate. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the protection of pigs against experimental A pleuropneumoniae infection following immunisation with two of these LPS preparations. Groups of five specific pathogen free (SPF) pigs were injected twice with one of the following antigen preparations: detoxified LPs, O-polysaccharide-BSA conjugate, a commercial bacterin, or PBS. Two weeks after the second injection, pigs were challenged intranasally with a virulent A pleuropneumoniae serotype 1 strain. Upon macroscopic examination, fibrino-haemorrhagic pleuropneumonia, compatible with A pleuropneumoniae infection, was observed in one to four pigs in each group. The more extensive lesions were present in control, unimmunised pigs and in animals vaccinated with the O-polysaccharide-BSA conjugate. The highest survival rate was recorded when the pigs had been immunised with detoxified LPs or the commercial bacterin. Taken together, our results suggest that a protection comparable with the one obtained with a commercial bacterin was observed when pigs were immunised with a single class of molecules, detoxified LPS. Most importantly, these results confirm the important role of A pleuropneumoniae LPS in protection against porcine pleuropneumonia. Finally, our results also support the idea that mice are not an appropriate model for the evaluation of porcine pleuropneumonia vaccines.