Loco-regional differences in pulmonary function and density after partial rat lung irradiation

• Published in: Radiotherapy and oncology 2003-10, Vol.69 (1), p.11-19
• Main Authors: Wiegman, E.M, Meertens, H, Konings, A.W.T, Kampinga, H.H, Coppes, R.P
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Absorptiometry, Photon; Animals; Ionising radiation; Lung - diagnostic imaging; Lung - physiopathology; Lung - radiation effects; Lung damage; Male; Radiation Dosage; Rat; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Respiration - radiation effects; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Volume
• ISSN: 0167-8140; 1879-0887
• DOI: 10.1016/S0167-8140(03)00132-4

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore regional differences in radiosensitivity of rat lung using lung function and computed tomography (CT) density as endpoints. Methods: At first, CT scans were used to determine rat lung volumes. The data obtained enabled the design of accurate collimators to irradiate 50% of the total lung volume for the apex, base, left, right, mediastinal and lateral part of the lung. Male Wistar rats were irradiated with a single dose of 18 Gy of orthovoltage X-rays. Further rat thorax CT scans were made before and 4, 16, 26, and 52 weeks after irradiation to measure in vivo lung density changes indicative of lung damage. To evaluate overall lung function, breathing frequencies were measured biweekly starting 1 week before irradiation. Results: Qualitative analysis of the CT scans showed clear density changes for all irradiated lung volumes, with the most prominent changes present in the mediastinal and left group at 26 weeks after radiation. Quantitative analysis using average density changes of whole lungs did not adequately describe the differences in radiation response between the treated groups. However, analysis of the density changes of the irradiated and non-irradiated regions of interest (ROI) more closely matched with the qualitative observations. Breathing frequencies (BF) were only increased after 50% left lung irradiation, indicating that the hypersensitivity of the mediastinal part as assessed by CT analysis, does not result in functional changes. Conclusions: For both BF and CT (best described by ROI analysis), differences in regional lung radiosensitivity were observed. The presentation of lung damage either as function loss or density changes do not necessarily coincide, meaning that for each endpoint the regional sensitivity may be different.