Titanite-rutile thermochronometry across the boundary between the Archaean Craton in Karelia and the Belomorian Mobile Belt, eastern Baltic Shield

• Published in: Precambrian research 2001-01, Vol.105 (2), p.315-330
• Main Authors: Bibikova, E., Skiöld, T., Bogdanova, S., Gorbatschev, R., Slabunov, A.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Eastern Baltic Shield; Palaeoproterozoic; Rutile; Titanite; U–Pb dating
• ISSN: 0301-9268; 1872-7433
• DOI: 10.1016/S0301-9268(00)00117-0

U–Pb isotopic dating has been carried out on titanites and rutiles from the Karelian Protocraton, the Belomorian Mobile Belt and the intervening junction zone. These are some of the principal Archaean crustal units in the Baltic Shield which have undergone regeneration to various degrees during the Palaeoproterozoic. Palaeoproterozoic resetting of U–Pb titanite ages was complete in the Belomorian Belt and almost complete in the junction zone, while it hardly affected the Karelian Protocraton. In the latter, major crustal cooling occurred at 2.71–2.69 Ga after a major igneous event at 2.74–2.72 Ga, but a tectonothermal event at 2.65–2.64 Ga was less comprehensive. In the Belomorian Belt, a northeastern marginal zone immediately underlying the collisional-thrusting suture of the Lapland-Kola orogen has somewhat higher titanite ages of ca. 1.94–1.87 Ga than the central zone where these ages range between 1.87 and 1.82 Ga. Comparison between the titanite and rutile U–Pb ages suggests a postorogenic cooling rate between 2 and 4°/Ma in these parts of the Belt. The Neoarchaean junction zone between the Karelian and Belomorian provinces was a zone of particularly intense tectonic, magmatic and hydrothermal activity during or after the Palaeoproterozoic Lapland-Kola orogeny. Dominant, newly grown titanites in that zone have ages as young as 1.78–1.75 Ga, and the age differences between the titanite and rutile U–Pb ages are substantially smaller than elsewhere.