Loading…

Energetic trap distributions in organic semiconductors

The electronic trap distributions of the vapor deposited electron transport material Alq 3 [tris(8-(hydroxyquinoline) aluminum] and hole transport material 1-NaphDATA [4,4′,4″-tris( N-(1-naphthyl)- N-phenylamino)-triphenylamine] have been analyzed by the fractional TSC method (thermally stimulated c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Synthetic metals 2002-06, Vol.129 (1), p.1-7
Main Authors: Steiger, J., Schmechel, R., von Seggern, H.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The electronic trap distributions of the vapor deposited electron transport material Alq 3 [tris(8-(hydroxyquinoline) aluminum] and hole transport material 1-NaphDATA [4,4′,4″-tris( N-(1-naphthyl)- N-phenylamino)-triphenylamine] have been analyzed by the fractional TSC method (thermally stimulated current) and the thermally stimulated luminescence (TL) technique. The obtained trap distributions can be described by a Gaussian distribution in case of Alq 3 and two discrete trap levels in case of 1-NaphDATA. In the case of Alq 3, a distinction between the trapped charge carrier polarity was possible. A correlation between the I– V curves of electron- and hole-only devices and the respective trap distributions suggests that the trap distribution is responsible for the shape of the observed current–voltage characteristics. It will be shown that the observed trap states cannot be explained by intrinsic tail states of regular HOMO and LUMO levels.
ISSN:0379-6779
1879-3290
DOI:10.1016/S0379-6779(02)00012-7