Loading…
Cutting cycle and spacing effects on biomass production by a willow clone in New York
An experiment was established in central New York State in 1990 to determine cutting cycle and spacing effects on willow biomass production. Cutting cycles were annual, biennial and triennial, and spacings were 0.3 × 0.3, 0.3 × 0.9, and 0.6 × 1.1 m; biomass production and survival by willow clone SV...
Saved in:
Published in: | Biomass & bioenergy 1997, Vol.12 (5), p.313-319 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | An experiment was established in central New York State in 1990 to determine cutting cycle and spacing effects on willow biomass production. Cutting cycles were annual, biennial and triennial, and spacings were 0.3 × 0.3, 0.3 × 0.9, and 0.6 × 1.1 m; biomass production and survival by willow clone SV1 (
Salix dasyclados) were measured. Beginning in the second growing season, trees were fertilized with N, P and K, and irrigated. Willow clone SV1 harvested triennially with 0.3 × 0.9 m spacing yielded 71.3 odt ha
−1, an average annual production of 23.8 odt ha
−1 year
−1. Spacing of 0.3 × 0.9 m yielded the most biomass, but spacing differences were not significant for biomass production. Triennial harvesting was significantly more productive than cumulative production after 3 years with annual harvesting (64.5 versus 39.2 odt ha
−1). Cumulative production from two biennial harvests was significantly larger than cumulative production from four annual harvests (64.3 versus 50.1 odt ha
−1). Tree survival was similar among cutting cycles after five growing seasons, averaging 75%. Statistically significant differences in survival were detected among spacings, averaging 88, 80 and 57% at 0.60 by 1.1, 0.3 × 0.9 and 0.3 × 0.3 m spacings, respectively during 1994. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0961-9534 1873-2909 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0961-9534(96)00077-3 |