Long-term follow-up of the AdVance®/AdVanceXP® sling. What are the surgeons’ impressions? What are the patients’?

To analyze the safety, efficacy and quality of life of patients with male stress urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy treated with the AdVance® and AdvanceXP® slings. The study included 92 patients with stress urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy treated with the AdVance® and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Actas urológicas españolas (English ed.) 2018-04, Vol.42 (3), p.185-190
Main Authors: Romero Hoyuela, A., Reina Alcaina, L., Izquierdo Morejon, E., Rosino Sanchez, A., Carrillo George, C., Rivero Guerra, A., Barcelo Bayonas, I., Pardo Martinez, A., Muñoz Guillermo, V., Pietricica, B., Fernandez Aparicio, T., Hita Villaplana, G., Miñana Lopez, B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Cabestrillo suburetral
Calidad de vida
Incontinencia urinaria
Prostatectomy
Prostatectomía
Quality of life
Suburethral sling
Urinary incontinence
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To analyze the safety, efficacy and quality of life of patients with male stress urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy treated with the AdVance® and AdvanceXP® slings. The study included 92 patients with stress urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy treated with the AdVance® and AdVanceXP® sling between May 2008 and December 2015. A perineal repositioning test was performed in all cases with sphincter coaptation of ≥1.5cm. Mild stress urinary incontinence was defined as the use of 1–2 absorbers/24h; moderate was defined as 3–5 absorbers/24h; and severe was defined as more than 5 absorbers/24h. Healing was defined as the total absence of using pads; improvement was defined as a reduction >50% in the number of pads; and failure was defined as a reduction
ISSN:2173-5786
2173-5786
DOI:10.1016/j.acuroe.2018.02.008