Loading…
Exploring alternative crop rotations to continuous winter wheat for agricultural intensification in the US central Great Plains
Low productivity, yield stagnation, and reduction of water use, altogether with increased susceptibility to climate variability represent a challenge for agricultural producers in the United States (US) central Great Plains. In this context, a more holistic assessment of the cropping systems should...
Saved in:
Published in: | Agricultural systems 2024-04, Vol.216, p.103879, Article 103879 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-68b913b14e73d92c495bdd1e84d4015d185df163e071a3085d8faf1d991a8c13 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-68b913b14e73d92c495bdd1e84d4015d185df163e071a3085d8faf1d991a8c13 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 103879 |
container_title | Agricultural systems |
container_volume | 216 |
creator | Massigoge, Ignacio Baral, Rudra Cominelli, Sofía Denson, Ethan Helguera, Paula García Guareschi, Cesar Simão, Luana M. Rud, Joaquín Peraza Pires, Carlos B. Dille, J. Anita Lollato, Romulo P. Min, Doohong Patrignani, Andres Ruiz Diaz, Dorivar A. Hefley, Trevor Lira, Sara Prasad, P.V. Vara Rice, Charles W. Hatfield, Jerry Ciampitti, Ignacio A. |
description | Low productivity, yield stagnation, and reduction of water use, altogether with increased susceptibility to climate variability represent a challenge for agricultural producers in the United States (US) central Great Plains. In this context, a more holistic assessment of the cropping systems should be considered as a critical aspect for developing more sustainable rainfed agricultural systems in this region.
The objectives of this study were to: i) quantify the fallow precipitation storage efficiency for a continuous winter wheat rotation (traditional rotation), ii) analyze and compare glucose-equivalent yields and economic results for different cropping sequences, and iii) determine efficiency components of the rotation for components such as precipitation use efficiency (PUE) and nitrogen (N) partial factor productivity (PFPN) for different cropping sequences and N management.
A three-year field experiment (2019–2022) was conducted near Manhattan, Kansas (US), under rainfed conditions. Treatments included eleven crop rotations, combining forage and grain purpose crops, and two N management, standard and progressive. An economic analysis based on the yield data combined with historical budgets was developed to compare income, expenses, and economic margins of different cropping systems.
No-till summer fallow represented low ( |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.agsy.2024.103879 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agsy_2024_103879</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0308521X24000295</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0308521X24000295</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-68b913b14e73d92c495bdd1e84d4015d185df163e071a3085d8faf1d991a8c13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9KAzEQxoMoWKsv4CkvsDWz2T9Z8CKlVqGgYAVvIU2ybcqalCTb2pOvbtZ69jTMzPcb5vsQugUyAQLV3XYi1uE4yUlepAFldXOGRsBqmuV5VZ-jEaGEZWUOH5foKoQtIaQBwkboe_a165w3do1FF7W3Ipq9xtK7HfYups7ZgKPD0tlobO_6gA_GJiU-bLSIuHUei7U3su9i70WHh6UNpjXyF049jhuN39-w1DYOirkfwNdOGBuu0UUruqBv_uoYLR9ny-lTtniZP08fFpmkhMSsYqsG6AoKXVPV5LJoypVSoFmhCgKlAlaqFiqqSQ0iWS0Va0ULqmlAMAl0jPLT2WQsBK9bvvPmU_gjB8KHBPmWDwnyIUF-SjBB9ydIp8f2RnsepNFWamW8lpErZ_7DfwDXCn2S</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exploring alternative crop rotations to continuous winter wheat for agricultural intensification in the US central Great Plains</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Massigoge, Ignacio ; Baral, Rudra ; Cominelli, Sofía ; Denson, Ethan ; Helguera, Paula García ; Guareschi, Cesar ; Simão, Luana M. ; Rud, Joaquín Peraza ; Pires, Carlos B. ; Dille, J. Anita ; Lollato, Romulo P. ; Min, Doohong ; Patrignani, Andres ; Ruiz Diaz, Dorivar A. ; Hefley, Trevor ; Lira, Sara ; Prasad, P.V. Vara ; Rice, Charles W. ; Hatfield, Jerry ; Ciampitti, Ignacio A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Massigoge, Ignacio ; Baral, Rudra ; Cominelli, Sofía ; Denson, Ethan ; Helguera, Paula García ; Guareschi, Cesar ; Simão, Luana M. ; Rud, Joaquín Peraza ; Pires, Carlos B. ; Dille, J. Anita ; Lollato, Romulo P. ; Min, Doohong ; Patrignani, Andres ; Ruiz Diaz, Dorivar A. ; Hefley, Trevor ; Lira, Sara ; Prasad, P.V. Vara ; Rice, Charles W. ; Hatfield, Jerry ; Ciampitti, Ignacio A.</creatorcontrib><description>Low productivity, yield stagnation, and reduction of water use, altogether with increased susceptibility to climate variability represent a challenge for agricultural producers in the United States (US) central Great Plains. In this context, a more holistic assessment of the cropping systems should be considered as a critical aspect for developing more sustainable rainfed agricultural systems in this region.
The objectives of this study were to: i) quantify the fallow precipitation storage efficiency for a continuous winter wheat rotation (traditional rotation), ii) analyze and compare glucose-equivalent yields and economic results for different cropping sequences, and iii) determine efficiency components of the rotation for components such as precipitation use efficiency (PUE) and nitrogen (N) partial factor productivity (PFPN) for different cropping sequences and N management.
A three-year field experiment (2019–2022) was conducted near Manhattan, Kansas (US), under rainfed conditions. Treatments included eleven crop rotations, combining forage and grain purpose crops, and two N management, standard and progressive. An economic analysis based on the yield data combined with historical budgets was developed to compare income, expenses, and economic margins of different cropping systems.
No-till summer fallow represented low (<20%) precipitation storage efficiency in the continuous winter wheat cropping system. In terms of cumulative dry matter and glucose-equivalent yields, greater overall productivity was feasible for more intensified systems and when forage crops were included in the crop sequence (e.g., ∼15 vs. ∼30 Mg glucose equivalent (GE) ha−1, for wheat monoculture and forage purpose only rotations, respectively). However, cropping sequences with high frequency of forages had negative economic margins (US$ -1113 to US$ -626 ha−1), while winter wheat combined with grain double crop rotation attained the highest positive economic returns (US$ 571 ha−1). Finally, progressive N-management increased PFPN relative to the standard management (63.5 vs. 54.2 kg GE kg N−1, respectively) while maintaining PUE for several intensified crop rotations.
Expanding the adoption of more intensified and diversified cropping systems could increase resource capture and use efficiency and productivity in the dominant continuous winter wheat systems in the US central Great Plains.
[Display omitted]
•No-till summer fallow had low (<20%) precipitation storage efficiency.•Including annual and perennial forages increased the productivity of crop rotations.•Double cropping after winter wheat resulted in the highest net income.•Intensive nitrogen fertilizer management increased nutrient partial factor productivity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0308-521X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2267</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2024.103879</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Crop diversification ; Glucose-equivalent ; Nitrogen management ; Rotation productivity ; Summer fallow</subject><ispartof>Agricultural systems, 2024-04, Vol.216, p.103879, Article 103879</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-68b913b14e73d92c495bdd1e84d4015d185df163e071a3085d8faf1d991a8c13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-68b913b14e73d92c495bdd1e84d4015d185df163e071a3085d8faf1d991a8c13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Massigoge, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baral, Rudra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cominelli, Sofía</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denson, Ethan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helguera, Paula García</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guareschi, Cesar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simão, Luana M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rud, Joaquín Peraza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pires, Carlos B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dille, J. Anita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lollato, Romulo P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Min, Doohong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patrignani, Andres</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruiz Diaz, Dorivar A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hefley, Trevor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lira, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prasad, P.V. Vara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rice, Charles W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hatfield, Jerry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciampitti, Ignacio A.</creatorcontrib><title>Exploring alternative crop rotations to continuous winter wheat for agricultural intensification in the US central Great Plains</title><title>Agricultural systems</title><description>Low productivity, yield stagnation, and reduction of water use, altogether with increased susceptibility to climate variability represent a challenge for agricultural producers in the United States (US) central Great Plains. In this context, a more holistic assessment of the cropping systems should be considered as a critical aspect for developing more sustainable rainfed agricultural systems in this region.
The objectives of this study were to: i) quantify the fallow precipitation storage efficiency for a continuous winter wheat rotation (traditional rotation), ii) analyze and compare glucose-equivalent yields and economic results for different cropping sequences, and iii) determine efficiency components of the rotation for components such as precipitation use efficiency (PUE) and nitrogen (N) partial factor productivity (PFPN) for different cropping sequences and N management.
A three-year field experiment (2019–2022) was conducted near Manhattan, Kansas (US), under rainfed conditions. Treatments included eleven crop rotations, combining forage and grain purpose crops, and two N management, standard and progressive. An economic analysis based on the yield data combined with historical budgets was developed to compare income, expenses, and economic margins of different cropping systems.
No-till summer fallow represented low (<20%) precipitation storage efficiency in the continuous winter wheat cropping system. In terms of cumulative dry matter and glucose-equivalent yields, greater overall productivity was feasible for more intensified systems and when forage crops were included in the crop sequence (e.g., ∼15 vs. ∼30 Mg glucose equivalent (GE) ha−1, for wheat monoculture and forage purpose only rotations, respectively). However, cropping sequences with high frequency of forages had negative economic margins (US$ -1113 to US$ -626 ha−1), while winter wheat combined with grain double crop rotation attained the highest positive economic returns (US$ 571 ha−1). Finally, progressive N-management increased PFPN relative to the standard management (63.5 vs. 54.2 kg GE kg N−1, respectively) while maintaining PUE for several intensified crop rotations.
Expanding the adoption of more intensified and diversified cropping systems could increase resource capture and use efficiency and productivity in the dominant continuous winter wheat systems in the US central Great Plains.
[Display omitted]
•No-till summer fallow had low (<20%) precipitation storage efficiency.•Including annual and perennial forages increased the productivity of crop rotations.•Double cropping after winter wheat resulted in the highest net income.•Intensive nitrogen fertilizer management increased nutrient partial factor productivity.</description><subject>Crop diversification</subject><subject>Glucose-equivalent</subject><subject>Nitrogen management</subject><subject>Rotation productivity</subject><subject>Summer fallow</subject><issn>0308-521X</issn><issn>1873-2267</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM9KAzEQxoMoWKsv4CkvsDWz2T9Z8CKlVqGgYAVvIU2ybcqalCTb2pOvbtZ69jTMzPcb5vsQugUyAQLV3XYi1uE4yUlepAFldXOGRsBqmuV5VZ-jEaGEZWUOH5foKoQtIaQBwkboe_a165w3do1FF7W3Ipq9xtK7HfYups7ZgKPD0tlobO_6gA_GJiU-bLSIuHUei7U3su9i70WHh6UNpjXyF049jhuN39-w1DYOirkfwNdOGBuu0UUruqBv_uoYLR9ny-lTtniZP08fFpmkhMSsYqsG6AoKXVPV5LJoypVSoFmhCgKlAlaqFiqqSQ0iWS0Va0ULqmlAMAl0jPLT2WQsBK9bvvPmU_gjB8KHBPmWDwnyIUF-SjBB9ydIp8f2RnsepNFWamW8lpErZ_7DfwDXCn2S</recordid><startdate>202404</startdate><enddate>202404</enddate><creator>Massigoge, Ignacio</creator><creator>Baral, Rudra</creator><creator>Cominelli, Sofía</creator><creator>Denson, Ethan</creator><creator>Helguera, Paula García</creator><creator>Guareschi, Cesar</creator><creator>Simão, Luana M.</creator><creator>Rud, Joaquín Peraza</creator><creator>Pires, Carlos B.</creator><creator>Dille, J. Anita</creator><creator>Lollato, Romulo P.</creator><creator>Min, Doohong</creator><creator>Patrignani, Andres</creator><creator>Ruiz Diaz, Dorivar A.</creator><creator>Hefley, Trevor</creator><creator>Lira, Sara</creator><creator>Prasad, P.V. Vara</creator><creator>Rice, Charles W.</creator><creator>Hatfield, Jerry</creator><creator>Ciampitti, Ignacio A.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202404</creationdate><title>Exploring alternative crop rotations to continuous winter wheat for agricultural intensification in the US central Great Plains</title><author>Massigoge, Ignacio ; Baral, Rudra ; Cominelli, Sofía ; Denson, Ethan ; Helguera, Paula García ; Guareschi, Cesar ; Simão, Luana M. ; Rud, Joaquín Peraza ; Pires, Carlos B. ; Dille, J. Anita ; Lollato, Romulo P. ; Min, Doohong ; Patrignani, Andres ; Ruiz Diaz, Dorivar A. ; Hefley, Trevor ; Lira, Sara ; Prasad, P.V. Vara ; Rice, Charles W. ; Hatfield, Jerry ; Ciampitti, Ignacio A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-68b913b14e73d92c495bdd1e84d4015d185df163e071a3085d8faf1d991a8c13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Crop diversification</topic><topic>Glucose-equivalent</topic><topic>Nitrogen management</topic><topic>Rotation productivity</topic><topic>Summer fallow</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Massigoge, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baral, Rudra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cominelli, Sofía</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denson, Ethan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helguera, Paula García</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guareschi, Cesar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simão, Luana M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rud, Joaquín Peraza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pires, Carlos B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dille, J. Anita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lollato, Romulo P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Min, Doohong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patrignani, Andres</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruiz Diaz, Dorivar A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hefley, Trevor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lira, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prasad, P.V. Vara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rice, Charles W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hatfield, Jerry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciampitti, Ignacio A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Agricultural systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Massigoge, Ignacio</au><au>Baral, Rudra</au><au>Cominelli, Sofía</au><au>Denson, Ethan</au><au>Helguera, Paula García</au><au>Guareschi, Cesar</au><au>Simão, Luana M.</au><au>Rud, Joaquín Peraza</au><au>Pires, Carlos B.</au><au>Dille, J. Anita</au><au>Lollato, Romulo P.</au><au>Min, Doohong</au><au>Patrignani, Andres</au><au>Ruiz Diaz, Dorivar A.</au><au>Hefley, Trevor</au><au>Lira, Sara</au><au>Prasad, P.V. Vara</au><au>Rice, Charles W.</au><au>Hatfield, Jerry</au><au>Ciampitti, Ignacio A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exploring alternative crop rotations to continuous winter wheat for agricultural intensification in the US central Great Plains</atitle><jtitle>Agricultural systems</jtitle><date>2024-04</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>216</volume><spage>103879</spage><pages>103879-</pages><artnum>103879</artnum><issn>0308-521X</issn><eissn>1873-2267</eissn><abstract>Low productivity, yield stagnation, and reduction of water use, altogether with increased susceptibility to climate variability represent a challenge for agricultural producers in the United States (US) central Great Plains. In this context, a more holistic assessment of the cropping systems should be considered as a critical aspect for developing more sustainable rainfed agricultural systems in this region.
The objectives of this study were to: i) quantify the fallow precipitation storage efficiency for a continuous winter wheat rotation (traditional rotation), ii) analyze and compare glucose-equivalent yields and economic results for different cropping sequences, and iii) determine efficiency components of the rotation for components such as precipitation use efficiency (PUE) and nitrogen (N) partial factor productivity (PFPN) for different cropping sequences and N management.
A three-year field experiment (2019–2022) was conducted near Manhattan, Kansas (US), under rainfed conditions. Treatments included eleven crop rotations, combining forage and grain purpose crops, and two N management, standard and progressive. An economic analysis based on the yield data combined with historical budgets was developed to compare income, expenses, and economic margins of different cropping systems.
No-till summer fallow represented low (<20%) precipitation storage efficiency in the continuous winter wheat cropping system. In terms of cumulative dry matter and glucose-equivalent yields, greater overall productivity was feasible for more intensified systems and when forage crops were included in the crop sequence (e.g., ∼15 vs. ∼30 Mg glucose equivalent (GE) ha−1, for wheat monoculture and forage purpose only rotations, respectively). However, cropping sequences with high frequency of forages had negative economic margins (US$ -1113 to US$ -626 ha−1), while winter wheat combined with grain double crop rotation attained the highest positive economic returns (US$ 571 ha−1). Finally, progressive N-management increased PFPN relative to the standard management (63.5 vs. 54.2 kg GE kg N−1, respectively) while maintaining PUE for several intensified crop rotations.
Expanding the adoption of more intensified and diversified cropping systems could increase resource capture and use efficiency and productivity in the dominant continuous winter wheat systems in the US central Great Plains.
[Display omitted]
•No-till summer fallow had low (<20%) precipitation storage efficiency.•Including annual and perennial forages increased the productivity of crop rotations.•Double cropping after winter wheat resulted in the highest net income.•Intensive nitrogen fertilizer management increased nutrient partial factor productivity.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.agsy.2024.103879</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0308-521X |
ispartof | Agricultural systems, 2024-04, Vol.216, p.103879, Article 103879 |
issn | 0308-521X 1873-2267 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agsy_2024_103879 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Crop diversification Glucose-equivalent Nitrogen management Rotation productivity Summer fallow |
title | Exploring alternative crop rotations to continuous winter wheat for agricultural intensification in the US central Great Plains |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T21%3A51%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exploring%20alternative%20crop%20rotations%20to%20continuous%20winter%20wheat%20for%20agricultural%20intensification%20in%20the%20US%20central%20Great%20Plains&rft.jtitle=Agricultural%20systems&rft.au=Massigoge,%20Ignacio&rft.date=2024-04&rft.volume=216&rft.spage=103879&rft.pages=103879-&rft.artnum=103879&rft.issn=0308-521X&rft.eissn=1873-2267&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.agsy.2024.103879&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES0308521X24000295%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-68b913b14e73d92c495bdd1e84d4015d185df163e071a3085d8faf1d991a8c13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |