Temporal trend of pesticide concentrations in the Chikugo River (Japan) with changes in environmental regulation and field infrastructure

• Published in: Agricultural water management 2012-10, Vol.113, p.96-104
• Main Authors: Phong, Thai Khanh, Inoue, Tsuyoshi, Yoshino, Katsunori, Hiramatsu, Kazuaki, Nhung, Dang Thi Tuyet
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions; Biological and medical sciences; drainage channels; environmental law; Field consolidation; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; infrastructure; paddies; pesticide application; Pesticide concentration; pesticides; rice; Rice pesticide; river water; rivers; Soil and water pollution; Soil science; water management; Water management regulation
• ISSN: 0378-3774; 1873-2283
• DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2012.07.002

► Concentrations of pesticides in the Chikugo River were monitored from 2004 to 2010. ► An extended water holding period (7 days) was introduced in early 2007. ► Some paddy fields in the area have been consolidated to improve water management. ► No significant reduction in pesticide levels in river water was observed after 2007. Contamination of pesticides, which are applied to rice paddy fields, in river water has been a major problem in Japan for decades. A prolonged water holding period after pesticide application in paddy fields is expected to reduce the concentration of rice pesticides in river water. Therefore, a long monitoring campaign was conducted from 2004 to 2010 to measure the concentrations of pesticides in water samples collected from several points along the Chikugo River (Japan) including tributaries and the main stream to see if there was any reduction in the level of pesticide contamination after the extension of the water holding period (from 3–4 days to 7 days) was introduced in 2007 by the new water management regulation. No significant difference (p>0.05) was found in pesticide concentrations between the periods before and after 2007 in all monitoring points, except in one tributary where the pesticide concentrations after 2007 were even higher than that of the previous period. A detailed study in one of the tributaries also revealed that the renovated infrastructure did not reduce the pesticide concentrations in the drainage canals. Neither the introduction of the new regulation nor the improved infrastructure had any significant effect on reducing the contamination of pesticides in water of the Chikugo River. It is probably because most farmers did not properly implement the new requirement of holding paddy water within the field for 7 days after the application of pesticides. Only tightening the regulation would not be sufficient and more actions should be taken to enforce/provide extension support for the new water management regulation in order to reduce the level of residual pesticides in river water in Japan.