Maize (Zea mays L.) physiological responses to drought and rewatering, and the associations with water stress degree

• Published in: Agricultural water management 2020-11, Vol.241, p.106379, Article 106379
• Main Authors: Cai, Fu, Zhang, Yushu, Mi, Na, Ming, Huiqing, Zhang, Shujie, Zhang, Hui, Zhao, Xianli
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Drought level; Dry matter; Maize; Organ water content; Photosynthesis; Transpiration
• ISSN: 0378-3774; 1873-2283
• DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106379

•Water stress degree (Dws) was established as an evaluation index to investigate maize functional traits responses to drought.•Leaf photosynthesis is more sensitive to drought and less available to recover in rewatering during the reproductive than vegetative period.•Leaf water content (WC) is more sensitive to drought than photosynthesis, and the response and recovery in daily sap flow rate depend on Dws.•The drought-caused reductions in leaf, stalk, and plant total dry matters as well as in leaf and stalk WCs are positively correlated with Dws. A thorough understanding of the plant drought response mechanism and the relationships between plant functional traits and drought will help to improve the key biophysical process parameterization scheme in ecological and crop growth models. In this study, a drought level evaluation indicator, named water stress degree (Dws), was established by synthetically considering soil water content (WC), evapotranspiration, and drought duration to obtain a quantitative description of drought level. The maize physiological and functional traits responses to drought and subsequent rewatering were also investigated. Drought-rewatering field experiments with no water addition for 40 days during the vegetative period (VP) and reproductive period (RP) were respectively conducted at Jinzhou Agrometerological Experimental Station, northeast China in 2014 and 2016. The Dws values indicated that there were significant differences between growth stages and between years because the environmental conditions in 2014 and 2016 were different during the maize growth periods. Furthermore, Dws was larger in 2016 than in 2014 during the VP and RP. Leaf photosynthesis had a certain adaptability to drought, and the transpiration rate (E) drought response (DR) was quicker than the photosynthetic rate (Pn) response, and Pn recovery was greater than E recovery when the plants were rewatered during the VP. However, leaf photosynthesis is more sensitive to drought and less available to recover as normal in subsequent rewatering during the RP than the VP, which was intensified as Dws rose between 2014 and 2016. In addition, the leaf WC drought response was faster than the photosynthetic DR during the VP and RP, and leaf and stalk WCs responded more rapidly to drought during the VP than the RP. The decrease in ear WC during the earlier grouting period was larger in the VP than in the RP treatment. However, the drought-induced decrease in daily sap flo