Editor's Summary, Q & A, Reviewer's Critique

Introduction The transpalatal arch (TPA), which splints together 2 maxillary molars, has been believed to preserve anchorage. The purpose of this study was to clarify this effect from a mechanical point of view. Methods The finite element method was used to simulate the movement of anchor teeth subj...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics 2008, Vol.134 (3), p.335-336
Main Authors: Kojima, Yukio, Fukui, Hisao
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Dentistry
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Introduction The transpalatal arch (TPA), which splints together 2 maxillary molars, has been believed to preserve anchorage. The purpose of this study was to clarify this effect from a mechanical point of view. Methods The finite element method was used to simulate the movement of anchor teeth subjected to mesial forces with and without a TPA. Results In the initial movement produced by elastic deformation of the periodontal ligament, stress magnitude in the periodontal ligament was not changed by the TPA. In the orthodontic movement produced by bone remodeling, the mesial force tipped the anchor teeth irrespective of the TPA. The tipping angles of anchor teeth with and without the TPA were almost the same. The anchor teeth without the TPA were rotated in the occlusal plane and moved transversely. Conclusions The TPA had no effect on the initial movement. In the orthodontic movement, the TPA had almost no effect, preserving anchorage for mesial movement. However, the TPA prevented rotational and transverse movements of the anchor teeth. These results are valid when the assumptions used in this calculation are satisfied.
ISSN:0889-5406
1097-6752
DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.06.001