Effect of Tenebrio molitor larvae meal on growth performance, in vivo nutrients digestibility, somatic and marketable indexes of gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata)

•The inclusion of T. molitor larvae meal in Sparus aurata diets is feasible up to 25%.•At 25% inclusion no negative effects on digestibility and marketable indexes were found.•At 50%, nutrients digestibility, dressed yield, VSI were penalized. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Animal feed science and technology 2017-04, Vol.226, p.12-20
Main Authors: Piccolo, G., Iaconisi, V., Marono, S., Gasco, L., Loponte, R., Nizza, S., Bovera, F., Parisi, G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Gilthead sea bream
Growth performance
Nutrients digestibility
Slaughter traits
Tenebrio molitor larvae meal
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•The inclusion of T. molitor larvae meal in Sparus aurata diets is feasible up to 25%.•At 25% inclusion no negative effects on digestibility and marketable indexes were found.•At 50%, nutrients digestibility, dressed yield, VSI were penalized. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of the inclusion of Tenebrio molitor larvae meal in practical diets for gilthead sea bream on growth performance, nutrients digestibility, somatic and marketable indexes. Two separate trials were carried out: in the first a total of 153 gilthead sea bream (105.2±0.17g average initial body weight) were randomly allocated in 9 fiberglass 220l tanks (17 fish per tank) in an indoor water recirculating system. The fish were fed three isoenergetic and isoproteic diets formulated to contain increasing levels of TM meal inclusion and precisely: a control diet (TM0), in which fish meal was the main protein source; TM25 and TM50 diets, in which 25% and 50% of Tenebrio molitor larvae meal was added to the diet, respectively. These inclusion rates corresponded to 30% and 60% of inclusion on protein bases and 35% and 71% of fish meal substitution on protein bases for TM25 and TM50 diets, respectively. Each diet was randomly assigned to 3 tanks and the trial lasted 163days. In the second trial, the apparent digestibility coefficients of the 3 diets were measured on 72 fish randomly distributed to 3 digestibility tank-units (24 fish per unit, average body weight: 86.97±2.3g) using an indirect method (acid insoluble ash). The group fed TM25 showed a higher (P
ISSN:0377-8401
1873-2216
DOI:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2017.02.007