Loading…
Economic and environmental assessment of n-butanol production in an integrated first and second generation sugarcane biorefinery: Fermentative versus catalytic routes
•Financial and environmental impacts of n-butanol production were investigated.•Analysis showed promising economic results for ABE fermentation scenarios.•Ethanol catalysis to butanol presented discouraging figures.•n-Butanol use as fuel demonstrated favorable GHG emissions results. n-Butanol produc...
Saved in:
Published in: | Applied energy 2015-12, Vol.160, p.120-131 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | •Financial and environmental impacts of n-butanol production were investigated.•Analysis showed promising economic results for ABE fermentation scenarios.•Ethanol catalysis to butanol presented discouraging figures.•n-Butanol use as fuel demonstrated favorable GHG emissions results.
n-Butanol produced from renewable resources has attracted increasing interest, mostly for its potential use as liquid biofuel for transportation. Process currently used in the industry (Acetone–Butanol–Ethanol fermentation – ABE) faces major technical challenges, which could be overcome by an alternative production through ethanol catalysis. In this study, both routes are evaluated by means of their financial viabilities and environmental performance assessed through the Virtual Sugarcane Biorefinery methodological framework. Comparative financial analysis of the routes integrated to a first and second generation sugarcane biorefinery shows that, despite the drawbacks, ABE process for fermentation of the pentoses liquor is more attractive than the catalysis of ethanol to n-butanol and co-products. n-Butanol use as fuel demonstrated favorable environmental results for climate change as figures showed over 50% reduction in greenhouse gas emission compared with gasoline. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0306-2619 1872-9118 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.09.063 |