Loading…

Driving aggressiveness in hybrid electric vehicles: Assessing the impact of driving volatility on emission rates

•Uses driving volatility approach for hybrid electric vehicles energy and emissions.•Driving volatility represented by nine behaviors associated with vehicular jerk.•Models shown to predict well carbon dioxide and particulate matter emission rates.•Vehicular jerk can be used to explain peaks in emis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Applied energy 2021-02, Vol.284, p.116250, Article 116250
Main Authors: Fernandes, P., Tomás, R., Ferreira, E., Bahmankhah, B., Coelho, M.C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Uses driving volatility approach for hybrid electric vehicles energy and emissions.•Driving volatility represented by nine behaviors associated with vehicular jerk.•Models shown to predict well carbon dioxide and particulate matter emission rates.•Vehicular jerk can be used to explain peaks in emission impacts during driving. Hybrid electric vehicles (HEV) have demonstrated energy benefits to road traffic networks, but a deeper understanding the correlation of driving volatility with their energy use and pollutant emissions is rather rare. This paper introduces an approach based on driver volatility measured by vehicle acceleration and jerk to estimate HEV emissions rates. Dynamic emission models represented by nine driving behaviors associated with vehicular jerk classification, and considering the on/off state of the internal combustion engine are proposed. To assess real-world emission performance, data were collected from one vehicle using a portable emissions measurement system. Results indicated that proposed models using engine speed as input were good predictors of carbon dioxide and particulate matter (R2 ranged from 0.72 to 0.96, depending on the pollutant and jerk type) for both internal combustion engine on/off states. However, the predicted emissions of nitrogen oxides resulted in values of R2 lower than 0.57, mostly due in part to the proportion of measured concentrations lower than the instrument detection limit (~47%). Driving volatility-based models accurately characterized measured carbon dioxide (with 1–16% of measured value) and yielded lower relative mean square errors than the traditional vehicle specific power modal approach. Our results suggest that vehicular jerk classification can be useful to reduce instantaneous emission impacts during different driving regimes. For instance, these models can be integrated into electronic car units to provide feedback about emission rates associated with volatile driving and into warning systems that could detect/prevent unsafe maneuvers. These classifications would allow for better energy efficiency and eco-efficient driving behavior controls for automated vehicles.
ISSN:0306-2619
1872-9118
DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116250