Loading…

Exergoeconomic analysis for a thermoelectric generator using mutation particle swarm optimization (M-PSO)

•Based on exergoeconomic analysis, a TEG was optimized by a M-PSO algorithm.•The accuracy can be improved by a larger mutation factor or particle population.•The acceleration constants affect the speed of convergence for large populations.•Pareto solutions can be acquired through a combined M-PSO an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Applied energy 2021-07, Vol.294, p.116952, Article 116952
Main Authors: Wang, Xi, Henshaw, Paul, Ting, David S.-K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-f2e44fd61693cdf6ce58c01ad19b4f469e0dabea96fd61dcbf0527c47e53dc5d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-f2e44fd61693cdf6ce58c01ad19b4f469e0dabea96fd61dcbf0527c47e53dc5d3
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 116952
container_title Applied energy
container_volume 294
creator Wang, Xi
Henshaw, Paul
Ting, David S.-K.
description •Based on exergoeconomic analysis, a TEG was optimized by a M-PSO algorithm.•The accuracy can be improved by a larger mutation factor or particle population.•The acceleration constants affect the speed of convergence for large populations.•Pareto solutions can be acquired through a combined M-PSO and ξ-constraint method.•Used TOPSIS analysis to select an ideal solution from among the Pareto solutions. Efficiency and cost-effectiveness play dominant roles in the commercialization of thermoelectric generator (TEG) technology. In this paper, the exergy analysis of a TEG module with 199 TE couples was considered. Two objective functions, the exergy efficiency and levelized cost of energy (LCOE), were established for exergoeconomic analysis. The geometric structure and working conditions involving TE couple length, base area ratio, working temperature, and load resistance were varied. The particle swarm optimization (PSO) method has excellent convergence and few parameters need to be adjusted. Mutation can increase randomization for the PSO method, making it possible to improve its search direction. Therefore, the mutation-PSO (M-PSO) algorithm was used to optimize the exergy efficiency and LCOE for the TEG. Through the M-PSO algorithm, the optimum corresponds to an exergy efficiency of 29% and LCOE of 1.93 $US/kWh·m2 under a maximum temperature difference of 40 K. In order to achieve a balance between the two exergoeconomic indices, the ξ-constraint combined with the M-PSO method was used to obtain alternatives, named Pareto solutions. Then, these alternatives were ranked to acquire an ideal solution based on a technique for order preference by similarity ideal solution (TOPSIS) method. The TOPSIS ideal solution corresponds to an exergy efficiency of 22.2% and LCOE of 3.02 $US/kWh·m2.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116952
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apenergy_2021_116952</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0306261921004293</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0306261921004293</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-f2e44fd61693cdf6ce58c01ad19b4f469e0dabea96fd61dcbf0527c47e53dc5d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwCshHOCTYTuI2N1DFn1RUJOBsufa6uEriyHaB8vQ4Cpw57WF2Znc-hM4pySmh_Gqbyx468Jt9zgijOaW8rtgBmtD5jGU1pfNDNCEF4RnjtD5GJyFsCUmbjEyQvf1KTgfKda61CstONvtgAzbOY4njO_jWQQMq-qRuhjsyJmkXbLfB7S7KaF2He-mjVQ3g8Cl9i10fbWu_R-3iKXt-WV2eoiMjmwBnv3OK3u5uXxcP2XJ1_7i4WWaqoCxmhkFZGs1TiUJpwxVUc0Wo1LRel6bkNRAt1yBrPixptTakYjNVzqAqtKp0MUV8zFXeheDBiN7bVvq9oEQMwMRW_AETAzAxAkvG69EI6bsPC14EZaFToK1P_YV29r-IH9sQe2w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exergoeconomic analysis for a thermoelectric generator using mutation particle swarm optimization (M-PSO)</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Wang, Xi ; Henshaw, Paul ; Ting, David S.-K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xi ; Henshaw, Paul ; Ting, David S.-K.</creatorcontrib><description>•Based on exergoeconomic analysis, a TEG was optimized by a M-PSO algorithm.•The accuracy can be improved by a larger mutation factor or particle population.•The acceleration constants affect the speed of convergence for large populations.•Pareto solutions can be acquired through a combined M-PSO and ξ-constraint method.•Used TOPSIS analysis to select an ideal solution from among the Pareto solutions. Efficiency and cost-effectiveness play dominant roles in the commercialization of thermoelectric generator (TEG) technology. In this paper, the exergy analysis of a TEG module with 199 TE couples was considered. Two objective functions, the exergy efficiency and levelized cost of energy (LCOE), were established for exergoeconomic analysis. The geometric structure and working conditions involving TE couple length, base area ratio, working temperature, and load resistance were varied. The particle swarm optimization (PSO) method has excellent convergence and few parameters need to be adjusted. Mutation can increase randomization for the PSO method, making it possible to improve its search direction. Therefore, the mutation-PSO (M-PSO) algorithm was used to optimize the exergy efficiency and LCOE for the TEG. Through the M-PSO algorithm, the optimum corresponds to an exergy efficiency of 29% and LCOE of 1.93 $US/kWh·m2 under a maximum temperature difference of 40 K. In order to achieve a balance between the two exergoeconomic indices, the ξ-constraint combined with the M-PSO method was used to obtain alternatives, named Pareto solutions. Then, these alternatives were ranked to acquire an ideal solution based on a technique for order preference by similarity ideal solution (TOPSIS) method. The TOPSIS ideal solution corresponds to an exergy efficiency of 22.2% and LCOE of 3.02 $US/kWh·m2.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0306-2619</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9118</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116952</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Epsilon-constraint ; Multi-objective optimization ; TEG ; TOPSIS</subject><ispartof>Applied energy, 2021-07, Vol.294, p.116952, Article 116952</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-f2e44fd61693cdf6ce58c01ad19b4f469e0dabea96fd61dcbf0527c47e53dc5d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-f2e44fd61693cdf6ce58c01ad19b4f469e0dabea96fd61dcbf0527c47e53dc5d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henshaw, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ting, David S.-K.</creatorcontrib><title>Exergoeconomic analysis for a thermoelectric generator using mutation particle swarm optimization (M-PSO)</title><title>Applied energy</title><description>•Based on exergoeconomic analysis, a TEG was optimized by a M-PSO algorithm.•The accuracy can be improved by a larger mutation factor or particle population.•The acceleration constants affect the speed of convergence for large populations.•Pareto solutions can be acquired through a combined M-PSO and ξ-constraint method.•Used TOPSIS analysis to select an ideal solution from among the Pareto solutions. Efficiency and cost-effectiveness play dominant roles in the commercialization of thermoelectric generator (TEG) technology. In this paper, the exergy analysis of a TEG module with 199 TE couples was considered. Two objective functions, the exergy efficiency and levelized cost of energy (LCOE), were established for exergoeconomic analysis. The geometric structure and working conditions involving TE couple length, base area ratio, working temperature, and load resistance were varied. The particle swarm optimization (PSO) method has excellent convergence and few parameters need to be adjusted. Mutation can increase randomization for the PSO method, making it possible to improve its search direction. Therefore, the mutation-PSO (M-PSO) algorithm was used to optimize the exergy efficiency and LCOE for the TEG. Through the M-PSO algorithm, the optimum corresponds to an exergy efficiency of 29% and LCOE of 1.93 $US/kWh·m2 under a maximum temperature difference of 40 K. In order to achieve a balance between the two exergoeconomic indices, the ξ-constraint combined with the M-PSO method was used to obtain alternatives, named Pareto solutions. Then, these alternatives were ranked to acquire an ideal solution based on a technique for order preference by similarity ideal solution (TOPSIS) method. The TOPSIS ideal solution corresponds to an exergy efficiency of 22.2% and LCOE of 3.02 $US/kWh·m2.</description><subject>Epsilon-constraint</subject><subject>Multi-objective optimization</subject><subject>TEG</subject><subject>TOPSIS</subject><issn>0306-2619</issn><issn>1872-9118</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwCshHOCTYTuI2N1DFn1RUJOBsufa6uEriyHaB8vQ4Cpw57WF2Znc-hM4pySmh_Gqbyx468Jt9zgijOaW8rtgBmtD5jGU1pfNDNCEF4RnjtD5GJyFsCUmbjEyQvf1KTgfKda61CstONvtgAzbOY4njO_jWQQMq-qRuhjsyJmkXbLfB7S7KaF2He-mjVQ3g8Cl9i10fbWu_R-3iKXt-WV2eoiMjmwBnv3OK3u5uXxcP2XJ1_7i4WWaqoCxmhkFZGs1TiUJpwxVUc0Wo1LRel6bkNRAt1yBrPixptTakYjNVzqAqtKp0MUV8zFXeheDBiN7bVvq9oEQMwMRW_AETAzAxAkvG69EI6bsPC14EZaFToK1P_YV29r-IH9sQe2w</recordid><startdate>20210715</startdate><enddate>20210715</enddate><creator>Wang, Xi</creator><creator>Henshaw, Paul</creator><creator>Ting, David S.-K.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210715</creationdate><title>Exergoeconomic analysis for a thermoelectric generator using mutation particle swarm optimization (M-PSO)</title><author>Wang, Xi ; Henshaw, Paul ; Ting, David S.-K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-f2e44fd61693cdf6ce58c01ad19b4f469e0dabea96fd61dcbf0527c47e53dc5d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Epsilon-constraint</topic><topic>Multi-objective optimization</topic><topic>TEG</topic><topic>TOPSIS</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henshaw, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ting, David S.-K.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Applied energy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Xi</au><au>Henshaw, Paul</au><au>Ting, David S.-K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exergoeconomic analysis for a thermoelectric generator using mutation particle swarm optimization (M-PSO)</atitle><jtitle>Applied energy</jtitle><date>2021-07-15</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>294</volume><spage>116952</spage><pages>116952-</pages><artnum>116952</artnum><issn>0306-2619</issn><eissn>1872-9118</eissn><abstract>•Based on exergoeconomic analysis, a TEG was optimized by a M-PSO algorithm.•The accuracy can be improved by a larger mutation factor or particle population.•The acceleration constants affect the speed of convergence for large populations.•Pareto solutions can be acquired through a combined M-PSO and ξ-constraint method.•Used TOPSIS analysis to select an ideal solution from among the Pareto solutions. Efficiency and cost-effectiveness play dominant roles in the commercialization of thermoelectric generator (TEG) technology. In this paper, the exergy analysis of a TEG module with 199 TE couples was considered. Two objective functions, the exergy efficiency and levelized cost of energy (LCOE), were established for exergoeconomic analysis. The geometric structure and working conditions involving TE couple length, base area ratio, working temperature, and load resistance were varied. The particle swarm optimization (PSO) method has excellent convergence and few parameters need to be adjusted. Mutation can increase randomization for the PSO method, making it possible to improve its search direction. Therefore, the mutation-PSO (M-PSO) algorithm was used to optimize the exergy efficiency and LCOE for the TEG. Through the M-PSO algorithm, the optimum corresponds to an exergy efficiency of 29% and LCOE of 1.93 $US/kWh·m2 under a maximum temperature difference of 40 K. In order to achieve a balance between the two exergoeconomic indices, the ξ-constraint combined with the M-PSO method was used to obtain alternatives, named Pareto solutions. Then, these alternatives were ranked to acquire an ideal solution based on a technique for order preference by similarity ideal solution (TOPSIS) method. The TOPSIS ideal solution corresponds to an exergy efficiency of 22.2% and LCOE of 3.02 $US/kWh·m2.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116952</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0306-2619
ispartof Applied energy, 2021-07, Vol.294, p.116952, Article 116952
issn 0306-2619
1872-9118
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apenergy_2021_116952
source Elsevier
subjects Epsilon-constraint
Multi-objective optimization
TEG
TOPSIS
title Exergoeconomic analysis for a thermoelectric generator using mutation particle swarm optimization (M-PSO)
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T17%3A40%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exergoeconomic%20analysis%20for%20a%20thermoelectric%20generator%20using%20mutation%20particle%20swarm%20optimization%20(M-PSO)&rft.jtitle=Applied%20energy&rft.au=Wang,%20Xi&rft.date=2021-07-15&rft.volume=294&rft.spage=116952&rft.pages=116952-&rft.artnum=116952&rft.issn=0306-2619&rft.eissn=1872-9118&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116952&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES0306261921004293%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-f2e44fd61693cdf6ce58c01ad19b4f469e0dabea96fd61dcbf0527c47e53dc5d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true