Can stress and anxiety be assessed in African elephants (Loxodonta africana) using self-directed behaviour?

Captive African elephants used in the tourism industry face numerous welfare issues which are often stress related and linked to high numbers of tourists or human-elephant interactions. Elephant welfare is commonly assessed by quantifying faecal glucocorticoid metabolite (fGCM) concentrations, and m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Applied animal behaviour science 2022-11, Vol.256, p.105746, Article 105746
Main Authors: Manning, Primrose, Hauff, Lindsey, Padfield, Clare, Olivier, Lisa, Ganswindt, Andre, Young, Debbie
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Captive elephant
Displacement activity
Glucocorticoid metabolites
Non-invasive
Welfare assessment
Wildlife tourism
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Captive African elephants used in the tourism industry face numerous welfare issues which are often stress related and linked to high numbers of tourists or human-elephant interactions. Elephant welfare is commonly assessed by quantifying faecal glucocorticoid metabolite (fGCM) concentrations, and monitoring stereotypic behaviour, which are either costly or problematic in identifying underlying causes. Self-directed behaviours (SDBs), a form of displacement activity, have been substantially linked with stress and anxiety in primates, and could be a potential but not yet utilised behavioural marker in elephants. We thus explored the usage of several trunk, tail, and body related SDBs in a group of 7 semi-captive African elephants maintained at the Knysna Elephant Park, a tourist destination offering a variety of close contact experiences. Using continuous behavioural sampling (focal following), SDBs were recorded as they occurred, along with the numbers of nearby tourists (5), and the nature of the tourist interaction (5 levels: None, Feed, Touch, Walk, and Ride). We then compared SDB rates with fGCM concentrations (n = 115) determined following observations (1 day and 2 days after behavioural sampling). Data were analysed using Generalized Linear Mixed effects Models. SDB rates (p/min) significantly increased during elephant Walks (p  0.05). Hence, SDBs may be correlated more with anxiety or lower-level stress, which is not significant enough to activate GC production, and may therefore act as a coping strategy utilised to maintain physiological homeostasis during anxiety-inducing situations. Additional research would benefit from coupling SDB observations with different forms of physiological assessments to better underst
ISSN:0168-1591
1872-9045
DOI:10.1016/j.applanim.2022.105746