Thermal and electrical performance analysis of a lightweight micro CHP system for recreational vehicles

• Published in: Applied thermal engineering 2024-12, Vol.257, p.124173, Article 124173
• Main Authors: Pinto, Daniel Vieira, Rosa, Josimar Souza, Wander, Paulo Roberto
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Cogeneration; Heat recovery; Micro CHP; Recreational Vehicles; Thermal performance
• ISSN: 1359-4311
• DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2024.124173

[Display omitted] •There is a research and commercial gap about cogeneration for recreational vehicles.•A combined heat/power system for recreational vehicles was developed and evaluated.•The device reached a primary energy utilization factor (UF) of 65.57 % ±0.33 %•Device performs better than commercial systems when providing heat and electricity.•The manufacturing cost is like the value of commercial models. For comfortable use of a Recreational Vehicle (RV), there is a need to supply electrical energy to recharge the batteries and supply the installed equipment, as well as thermal energy, for hot water and ambient heating. A conventional solution for supplying electrical energy is the installation of photovoltaic modules combined with connection to an electrical grid, when possible. Water heating is generally done using a passage gas heater or hybrid gas/electric storage heater. Imported vehicles have gas heating and many other vehicles have diesel heaters. To develop an alternative to currently available energy supply methods, this work proposes the creation of a cogeneration system for RVs. From a literature review, a research gap was identified in relation to micro CHP devices for RVs. In the development of this work, a micro CHP prototype was created, with 980 W of maximum electrical power, consisting of a single-cylinder internal combustion engine, an automotive alternator and heat exchangers for heat recovery. The prototype was enclosed and instrumented, allowing to evaluate the thermal power obtained in water flowing through exhaust gases, lubricating oil and cooling air heat recovery systems, in addition to measuring the electrical power of the alternator. Operational tests were carried out with 46 different test conditions, combining variations in the engine speed (N) and in electrical load. The prototype electrical efficiency reached 10.18 % ±0.2 % at 3008 rpm with 83 % load. The maximum electrical power was 0.746 kW±0.015 kW at 3637 rpm and 100 % load. The maximum thermal energy recovery rate was 3.267 kW±0.039 kW. Utilization factor reached 65.57 % ±0.33 % at 3208 rpm with 63 % load. Compared to traditional means of providing electrical power and thermal power for RVs, the prototype proved to be more advantageous when the demand is for electrical power and space heating. However, for conditions in which the demand is for electrical power and water heating, or just electrical power, the current solutions available are still more efficient.