Loading…
Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)/reduced graphene oxide composites as counter electrodes for high efficiency dye-sensitized solar cells
•Chemical combination of rGO and PEDOT is helpful to electrocatalytic abilities.•A PCE of DSSC reached 7.79%, close to 8.33% of the Platinum (Pt) electrode.•The electrocatalytic ability was evaluated by scanning electrochemical microscopy. A facile, low cost, easy-controllable method to prepare Poly...
Saved in:
Published in: | Applied surface science 2018-05, Vol.440, p.8-15 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | •Chemical combination of rGO and PEDOT is helpful to electrocatalytic abilities.•A PCE of DSSC reached 7.79%, close to 8.33% of the Platinum (Pt) electrode.•The electrocatalytic ability was evaluated by scanning electrochemical microscopy.
A facile, low cost, easy-controllable method to prepare Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT)/reduced graphene oxide (rGO) composites by electrochemical deposition onto fluorinated tin oxide (FTO) as counter electrodes (CEs) in high performance dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) is reported. The electro-deposition process was accomplished by electro-polymerization of graphene oxide (GO)/PEDOT composites onto FTO substrates followed by electrochemical reduction of the GO component. Electrochemical measurements show that the I−/I3− catalytic activity of the as-prepared PEDOT/rGO CE is improved compared with that of the pure PEDOT and PEDOT/GO electrode. Through the analysis of photoelectric properties, the performance of the electrodes fabricated with different polymerization times are compared, and the optimal preparation condition is determined. The photoelectric conversion efficiency (PCE) of the DSSC assembled with PEDOT/rGO electrode reaches 7.79%, close to 8.33% of the cell with Platinum (Pt) electrode, and increases by 13.2% compared with 6.88% of the device with the PEDOT electrode. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0169-4332 1873-5584 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.01.100 |