Greenhouse gas response and Spartina alterniflora resilience to macroalgal exposure

•Spartina alterniflora response to macroalgal coverage depends on the algal species.•Greenhouse gases were not significantly impacted by macroalgal cover.•S. alterniflora shows resilience to current, relatively low macroalgal coverage. Climate change can alter salt marsh plant communities and their...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Aquatic botany 2020-03, Vol.162, p.103185, Article 103185
Main Authors: Perry, Danielle C., Moseman-Valtierra, Serena, Thornber, Carol
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Climate change
Coastal hazards
Eutrophication
Greenhouse gases
Macroalgae
Salt marsh
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Spartina alterniflora response to macroalgal coverage depends on the algal species.•Greenhouse gases were not significantly impacted by macroalgal cover.•S. alterniflora shows resilience to current, relatively low macroalgal coverage. Climate change can alter salt marsh plant communities and their associated carbon flux dynamics via several mechanisms. Due to warming waters and sea level rise, macroalgal wrack accumulation rates in salt marshes are expected to increase. The smothering and shading effects of macroalgal wrack can have adverse effects on salt marsh vegetation. Most studies have focused on the impacts of high-density accumulation or future accumulation projections, but the impacts of current accumulations of macroalgae on Spartina alterniflora (S. alterniflora) are unclear. We investigated how current, relatively low-density ephemeral (Ulva spp.) and perennial (Fucus spp.) algal wrack coverage impacts S. alterniflora survival and associated greenhouse gas fluxes. We created mesocosms with S. alterniflora-vegetated soil cores using a 2 × 2 factorial design with Fucus and Ulva present or absent. After one month, S. alterniflora cores with Ulva (but no Fucus) had a significantly lower stem density, but they later recovered, attesting to S. alterniflora’s resilience to low-density macroalgal coverage. Our results also suggest that Fucus can alter the interaction between Ulva and S. alterniflora by potentially mitigating Ulva’s impacts. Macroalgal presence did not significantly influence greenhouse gas fluxes, which suggests the low-density exposure is not altering the salt marsh carbon flux dynamics.
ISSN:0304-3770
1879-1522
DOI:10.1016/j.aquabot.2019.103185