Loading…

Visualizing formative feedback in statistics writing: An exploratory study of student motivation using DocuScope Write & Audit

Recently, formative feedback in writing instruction has been supported by technologies generally referred to as Automated Writing Evaluation tools. However, such tools are limited in their capacity to explore specific disciplinary genres, and they have shown mixed results in student writing improvem...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Assessing writing 2024-04, Vol.60, p.100830, Article 100830
Main Authors: Laudenbach, Michael, Brown, David West, Guo, Zhiyu, Ishizaki, Suguru, Reinhart, Alex, Weinberg, Gordon
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-e10d9b98fe428e3cca586eaf147954866977ca2807d52f167dbe7e6a34b82bdd3
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 100830
container_title Assessing writing
container_volume 60
creator Laudenbach, Michael
Brown, David West
Guo, Zhiyu
Ishizaki, Suguru
Reinhart, Alex
Weinberg, Gordon
description Recently, formative feedback in writing instruction has been supported by technologies generally referred to as Automated Writing Evaluation tools. However, such tools are limited in their capacity to explore specific disciplinary genres, and they have shown mixed results in student writing improvement. We explore how technology-enhanced writing interventions can positively affect student attitudes toward and beliefs about writing, both reinforcing content knowledge and increasing student motivation. Using a student-facing text-visualization tool called Write & Audit, we hosted revision workshops for students (n = 30) in an introductory-level statistics course at a large North American University. The tool is designed to be flexible: instructors of various courses can create expectations and predefine topics that are genre-specific. In this way, students are offered non-evaluative formative feedback which redirects them to field-specific strategies. To gauge the usefulness of Write & Audit, we used a previously validated survey instrument designed to measure the construct model of student motivation (Ling et al. 2021). Our results show significant increases in student self-efficacy and beliefs about the importance of content in successful writing. We contextualize these findings with data from three student think-aloud interviews, which demonstrate metacognitive awareness while using the tool. Ultimately, this exploratory study is non-experimental, but it contributes a novel approach to automated formative feedback and confirms the promising potential of Write & Audit. •A new student-facing writing technology, Write & Audit, is introduced.•The tool offers formative feedback for specialized, disciplinary genres.•Our initial implementation of the tool in a statistics workshop shows promising results.•Student participants showed improvements in motivation.•Think-aloud data display the tool’s encouragement of metacognitive reflection.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.asw.2024.100830
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_asw_2024_100830</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1075293524000230</els_id><sourcerecordid>S1075293524000230</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-e10d9b98fe428e3cca586eaf147954866977ca2807d52f167dbe7e6a34b82bdd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kDlPAzEQhVcIJMLxA-hc0W3wsbv2QhVxS0gUXKXltcfIIVlHtjchFPx2HEJNNW9G73savaI4IXhMMGnOpmMVV2OKaZV3LBjeKUZEcFbWLWl2s8a8LmnL6v3iIMYpxqTCjI2K71cXBzVzX65_R9aHuUpuCcgCmE7pD-R6FFO-xeR0RKvgUjaeo0mP4HMx80ElH9bZMpg18vZXQJ_Q3OeYjPkeDXETfeX18KT9AtBbzgB0iiaDcemo2LNqFuH4bx4WLzfXz5d35cPj7f3l5KHUtKWpBIJN27XCQkUFMK1VLRpQllS8rSvRNC3nWlGBuampJQ03HXBoFKs6QTtj2GFBtrk6-BgDWLkIbq7CWhIsNwXKqcwFyk2BcltgZi62DOTHlg6CjNpBr8G4ADpJ490_9A-YfnwJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Visualizing formative feedback in statistics writing: An exploratory study of student motivation using DocuScope Write &amp; Audit</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Laudenbach, Michael ; Brown, David West ; Guo, Zhiyu ; Ishizaki, Suguru ; Reinhart, Alex ; Weinberg, Gordon</creator><creatorcontrib>Laudenbach, Michael ; Brown, David West ; Guo, Zhiyu ; Ishizaki, Suguru ; Reinhart, Alex ; Weinberg, Gordon</creatorcontrib><description>Recently, formative feedback in writing instruction has been supported by technologies generally referred to as Automated Writing Evaluation tools. However, such tools are limited in their capacity to explore specific disciplinary genres, and they have shown mixed results in student writing improvement. We explore how technology-enhanced writing interventions can positively affect student attitudes toward and beliefs about writing, both reinforcing content knowledge and increasing student motivation. Using a student-facing text-visualization tool called Write &amp; Audit, we hosted revision workshops for students (n = 30) in an introductory-level statistics course at a large North American University. The tool is designed to be flexible: instructors of various courses can create expectations and predefine topics that are genre-specific. In this way, students are offered non-evaluative formative feedback which redirects them to field-specific strategies. To gauge the usefulness of Write &amp; Audit, we used a previously validated survey instrument designed to measure the construct model of student motivation (Ling et al. 2021). Our results show significant increases in student self-efficacy and beliefs about the importance of content in successful writing. We contextualize these findings with data from three student think-aloud interviews, which demonstrate metacognitive awareness while using the tool. Ultimately, this exploratory study is non-experimental, but it contributes a novel approach to automated formative feedback and confirms the promising potential of Write &amp; Audit. •A new student-facing writing technology, Write &amp; Audit, is introduced.•The tool offers formative feedback for specialized, disciplinary genres.•Our initial implementation of the tool in a statistics workshop shows promising results.•Student participants showed improvements in motivation.•Think-aloud data display the tool’s encouragement of metacognitive reflection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1075-2935</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5916</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.asw.2024.100830</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) ; Formative feedback ; Statistics ; Writing assessment ; Writing in the Disciplines (WID)</subject><ispartof>Assessing writing, 2024-04, Vol.60, p.100830, Article 100830</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-e10d9b98fe428e3cca586eaf147954866977ca2807d52f167dbe7e6a34b82bdd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1691-0562</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Laudenbach, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, David West</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Zhiyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishizaki, Suguru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reinhart, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinberg, Gordon</creatorcontrib><title>Visualizing formative feedback in statistics writing: An exploratory study of student motivation using DocuScope Write &amp; Audit</title><title>Assessing writing</title><description>Recently, formative feedback in writing instruction has been supported by technologies generally referred to as Automated Writing Evaluation tools. However, such tools are limited in their capacity to explore specific disciplinary genres, and they have shown mixed results in student writing improvement. We explore how technology-enhanced writing interventions can positively affect student attitudes toward and beliefs about writing, both reinforcing content knowledge and increasing student motivation. Using a student-facing text-visualization tool called Write &amp; Audit, we hosted revision workshops for students (n = 30) in an introductory-level statistics course at a large North American University. The tool is designed to be flexible: instructors of various courses can create expectations and predefine topics that are genre-specific. In this way, students are offered non-evaluative formative feedback which redirects them to field-specific strategies. To gauge the usefulness of Write &amp; Audit, we used a previously validated survey instrument designed to measure the construct model of student motivation (Ling et al. 2021). Our results show significant increases in student self-efficacy and beliefs about the importance of content in successful writing. We contextualize these findings with data from three student think-aloud interviews, which demonstrate metacognitive awareness while using the tool. Ultimately, this exploratory study is non-experimental, but it contributes a novel approach to automated formative feedback and confirms the promising potential of Write &amp; Audit. •A new student-facing writing technology, Write &amp; Audit, is introduced.•The tool offers formative feedback for specialized, disciplinary genres.•Our initial implementation of the tool in a statistics workshop shows promising results.•Student participants showed improvements in motivation.•Think-aloud data display the tool’s encouragement of metacognitive reflection.</description><subject>Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE)</subject><subject>Formative feedback</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Writing assessment</subject><subject>Writing in the Disciplines (WID)</subject><issn>1075-2935</issn><issn>1873-5916</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kDlPAzEQhVcIJMLxA-hc0W3wsbv2QhVxS0gUXKXltcfIIVlHtjchFPx2HEJNNW9G73savaI4IXhMMGnOpmMVV2OKaZV3LBjeKUZEcFbWLWl2s8a8LmnL6v3iIMYpxqTCjI2K71cXBzVzX65_R9aHuUpuCcgCmE7pD-R6FFO-xeR0RKvgUjaeo0mP4HMx80ElH9bZMpg18vZXQJ_Q3OeYjPkeDXETfeX18KT9AtBbzgB0iiaDcemo2LNqFuH4bx4WLzfXz5d35cPj7f3l5KHUtKWpBIJN27XCQkUFMK1VLRpQllS8rSvRNC3nWlGBuampJQ03HXBoFKs6QTtj2GFBtrk6-BgDWLkIbq7CWhIsNwXKqcwFyk2BcltgZi62DOTHlg6CjNpBr8G4ADpJ490_9A-YfnwJ</recordid><startdate>202404</startdate><enddate>202404</enddate><creator>Laudenbach, Michael</creator><creator>Brown, David West</creator><creator>Guo, Zhiyu</creator><creator>Ishizaki, Suguru</creator><creator>Reinhart, Alex</creator><creator>Weinberg, Gordon</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1691-0562</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202404</creationdate><title>Visualizing formative feedback in statistics writing: An exploratory study of student motivation using DocuScope Write &amp; Audit</title><author>Laudenbach, Michael ; Brown, David West ; Guo, Zhiyu ; Ishizaki, Suguru ; Reinhart, Alex ; Weinberg, Gordon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-e10d9b98fe428e3cca586eaf147954866977ca2807d52f167dbe7e6a34b82bdd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE)</topic><topic>Formative feedback</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Writing assessment</topic><topic>Writing in the Disciplines (WID)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Laudenbach, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, David West</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Zhiyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishizaki, Suguru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reinhart, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinberg, Gordon</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Assessing writing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Laudenbach, Michael</au><au>Brown, David West</au><au>Guo, Zhiyu</au><au>Ishizaki, Suguru</au><au>Reinhart, Alex</au><au>Weinberg, Gordon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Visualizing formative feedback in statistics writing: An exploratory study of student motivation using DocuScope Write &amp; Audit</atitle><jtitle>Assessing writing</jtitle><date>2024-04</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>60</volume><spage>100830</spage><pages>100830-</pages><artnum>100830</artnum><issn>1075-2935</issn><eissn>1873-5916</eissn><abstract>Recently, formative feedback in writing instruction has been supported by technologies generally referred to as Automated Writing Evaluation tools. However, such tools are limited in their capacity to explore specific disciplinary genres, and they have shown mixed results in student writing improvement. We explore how technology-enhanced writing interventions can positively affect student attitudes toward and beliefs about writing, both reinforcing content knowledge and increasing student motivation. Using a student-facing text-visualization tool called Write &amp; Audit, we hosted revision workshops for students (n = 30) in an introductory-level statistics course at a large North American University. The tool is designed to be flexible: instructors of various courses can create expectations and predefine topics that are genre-specific. In this way, students are offered non-evaluative formative feedback which redirects them to field-specific strategies. To gauge the usefulness of Write &amp; Audit, we used a previously validated survey instrument designed to measure the construct model of student motivation (Ling et al. 2021). Our results show significant increases in student self-efficacy and beliefs about the importance of content in successful writing. We contextualize these findings with data from three student think-aloud interviews, which demonstrate metacognitive awareness while using the tool. Ultimately, this exploratory study is non-experimental, but it contributes a novel approach to automated formative feedback and confirms the promising potential of Write &amp; Audit. •A new student-facing writing technology, Write &amp; Audit, is introduced.•The tool offers formative feedback for specialized, disciplinary genres.•Our initial implementation of the tool in a statistics workshop shows promising results.•Student participants showed improvements in motivation.•Think-aloud data display the tool’s encouragement of metacognitive reflection.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.asw.2024.100830</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1691-0562</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1075-2935
ispartof Assessing writing, 2024-04, Vol.60, p.100830, Article 100830
issn 1075-2935
1873-5916
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_asw_2024_100830
source Elsevier
subjects Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE)
Formative feedback
Statistics
Writing assessment
Writing in the Disciplines (WID)
title Visualizing formative feedback in statistics writing: An exploratory study of student motivation using DocuScope Write & Audit
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T00%3A07%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Visualizing%20formative%20feedback%20in%20statistics%20writing:%20An%20exploratory%20study%20of%20student%20motivation%20using%20DocuScope%20Write%20&%20Audit&rft.jtitle=Assessing%20writing&rft.au=Laudenbach,%20Michael&rft.date=2024-04&rft.volume=60&rft.spage=100830&rft.pages=100830-&rft.artnum=100830&rft.issn=1075-2935&rft.eissn=1873-5916&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.asw.2024.100830&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES1075293524000230%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-e10d9b98fe428e3cca586eaf147954866977ca2807d52f167dbe7e6a34b82bdd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true