Loading…

A simulation study of the changes in PM2.5 concentrations due to interzonal airflow variations caused by internal door opening patterns

Short-term variations in interzonal airflows can cause significant fluctuations in gaseous or particulate matter concentrations in indoor environments and therefore, interzonal airflow variations need careful consideration when modelling indoor pollutant concentrations. This study investigates the p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Atmospheric environment (1994) 2014-04, Vol.87, p.183-188
Main Authors: McGrath, J.A., Byrne, M.A., Ashmore, M.R., Terry, A.C., Dimitroulopoulou, C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Short-term variations in interzonal airflows can cause significant fluctuations in gaseous or particulate matter concentrations in indoor environments and therefore, interzonal airflow variations need careful consideration when modelling indoor pollutant concentrations. This study investigates the potential accuracy of modelling interzonal airflow variations and assesses the effect of interzonal airflow variations on indoor pollutant concentrations. A variable interzonal airflow is compared with a time-weighted average interzonal airflow, and the differences in the resulting estimates of indoor pollutant concentrations are analysed. Interzonal airflow variations were simulated by the opening/closing of internal doors for periods of 1, 2, 5, 10, 15 and 30 min. Based on experimental comparison, it can be concluded that the modelling approach used, accurately predicts PM2.5 concentrations for interzonal airflow variations for durations of 10 min or greater, with increasing accuracy for longer durations. The simulations demonstrate that both the time of occurrence and duration of the interzonal airflow variations are critical in determining indoor concentrations, and indicating that a time-weighted average interzonal airflow is not a suitable substitute for modelling interzonal airflow variations, as it under-predicts mean PM2.5 concentrations by up to 28%. •Simulating indoor air pollutant concentrations under interzonal airflow variations.•Airflow variations were simulated by the opening/closing of internal doors.•Investigates the potential accuracy of modeling airflow variations.•A variable airflow is compared with a time-weighted average airflow.•The time of occurrence and duration of the airflow variations are critical.
ISSN:1352-2310
1873-2844
DOI:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.01.050