Differential cardiopulmonary effects of isoprene-versus toluene-generated photochemically-Aged smog in rats

• Published in: Atmospheric environment (1994) 2023-02, Vol.295, p.119525, Article 119525
• Main Authors: Snow, Samantha J., Krug, Jonathan D., Turlington, John M., Richards, Judy E., Schladweiler, Mette C., Ledbetter, Allen D., Krantz, Todd, King, Charly, Gilmour, M. Ian, Gavett, Stephen H., Kodavanti, Urmila P., Farraj, Aimen K., Hazari, Mehdi S.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Cardiovascular; Isoprene; Pulmonary; Rats; Smog; Toluene
• ISSN: 1352-2310
• DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119525

Photochemical smog is a complex mixture of primary and secondary air pollutants including secondary organic aerosols (SOA), ozone and reactive aldehydes which has been linked to increased risk of adverse cardiovascular and pulmonary responses. The components and related health effects of smog are thought to be determined both by the precursor chemicals and reaction conditions. Here we examined the difference between isoprene- (IS-) and toluene- (TL) generated smog in causing cardiopulmonary effects in rats. Wistar-Kyoto rats were exposed to either filtered air (FA) or smog for 4 h. IS-smog contained 660 ppb NO2, 335 ppb O3, and 178 μg/m3 SOA while TL-smog had 380 ppb NO2, 250 ppb O3, and 1,250 μg/m3 SOA. Whole-body plethysmography was performed at baseline and after each exposure and left ventricular function was measured using a Millar probe and arrhythmic sensitivity to aconitine. Tidal volume decreased only after IS-smog while inspiratory time and nasal injury increased following both smog atmospheres. Only TL-smog caused an increase in PenH, which is an indicator of airway irritation. On the other hand, only IS-smog caused left ventricular pressure to decrease, while only TL-smog increased sensitivity to cardiac arrhythmia. These data indicate that the source of smog atmosphere plays a large role in the types of responses it elicits and that its relative SOA and gaseous composition determine the extent of cardiovascular versus respiratory effects.