Loading…
Mechanical pretreatment of biomass – Part I: Acoustic and hydrodynamic cavitation
Acoustic and hydrodynamic cavitation were examined as suitable mechanical pretreatments for lignocellulosic biomass. Microcrystalline cellulose and lime-treated sugarcane bagasse were subjected to acoustic cavitation, whereas raw and lime-treated sugarcane bagasse were subjected to hydrodynamic cavi...
Saved in:
Published in: | Biomass & bioenergy 2017-03, Vol.98, p.135-141 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Acoustic and hydrodynamic cavitation were examined as suitable mechanical pretreatments for lignocellulosic biomass. Microcrystalline cellulose and lime-treated sugarcane bagasse were subjected to acoustic cavitation, whereas raw and lime-treated sugarcane bagasse were subjected to hydrodynamic cavitation. Acoustic cavitation successfully increased microcrystalline cellulose enzymatic digestibility by 37% compared to no acoustic cavitation treatment; however, there was no significant effect on lime-treated sugarcane bagasse. Hydrodynamic cavitation increased the enzymatic digestibility of both raw and lime-treated sugarcane bagasse. Best results were obtained using cavitation treatment of bagasse followed by lime treatment; the 3-d enzymatic digestion increased by 46% when compared to lime treatment only.
•Acoustic and hydrodynamic cavitation were examined as mechanical pretreatments.•Acoustic cavitation of microcrystalline cellulose showed significant gains over no treatment.•Hydrodynamic cavitation increased the enzymatic digestibility of both raw and lime-treated sugarcane bagasse.•The energy cost of hydrodynamic cavitation is too expensive to be economical. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0961-9534 1873-2909 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.01.007 |