Loading…

Mechanical pretreatment of biomass – Part I: Acoustic and hydrodynamic cavitation

Acoustic and hydrodynamic cavitation were examined as suitable mechanical pretreatments for lignocellulosic biomass. Microcrystalline cellulose and lime-treated sugarcane bagasse were subjected to acoustic cavitation, whereas raw and lime-treated sugarcane bagasse were subjected to hydrodynamic cavi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biomass & bioenergy 2017-03, Vol.98, p.135-141
Main Authors: Madison, Maxine Jones, Coward-Kelly, Guillermo, Liang, Chao, Karim, M. Nazmul, Falls, Matthew, Holtzapple, Mark T.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Acoustic and hydrodynamic cavitation were examined as suitable mechanical pretreatments for lignocellulosic biomass. Microcrystalline cellulose and lime-treated sugarcane bagasse were subjected to acoustic cavitation, whereas raw and lime-treated sugarcane bagasse were subjected to hydrodynamic cavitation. Acoustic cavitation successfully increased microcrystalline cellulose enzymatic digestibility by 37% compared to no acoustic cavitation treatment; however, there was no significant effect on lime-treated sugarcane bagasse. Hydrodynamic cavitation increased the enzymatic digestibility of both raw and lime-treated sugarcane bagasse. Best results were obtained using cavitation treatment of bagasse followed by lime treatment; the 3-d enzymatic digestion increased by 46% when compared to lime treatment only. •Acoustic and hydrodynamic cavitation were examined as mechanical pretreatments.•Acoustic cavitation of microcrystalline cellulose showed significant gains over no treatment.•Hydrodynamic cavitation increased the enzymatic digestibility of both raw and lime-treated sugarcane bagasse.•The energy cost of hydrodynamic cavitation is too expensive to be economical.
ISSN:0961-9534
1873-2909
DOI:10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.01.007