Loading…

Effects of membrane processed renewable biogas fuels on natural gas designed turbine's power cycle and fuel consumption

This research analyzed and explored two different configurations of membranes, carbon dioxide selective and methane selective membranes, to produce processed biofuels (Fuel 2 and 3) from crude biogas plant (Fuel 1) for the first time. In addition, the effect of crude and processed fuels on gas turbi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biomass & bioenergy 2022-08, Vol.163, p.106530, Article 106530
Main Authors: Hasan, Masad Mezher, González Álvarez, José Francisco, Qazi, Irfan Ali, Othman, Mohd Roslee
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c227t-670e5b3a505ff0b54cf0c8a3a278cb7503227c8d606e092d9cc064535fe651a63
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c227t-670e5b3a505ff0b54cf0c8a3a278cb7503227c8d606e092d9cc064535fe651a63
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 106530
container_title Biomass & bioenergy
container_volume 163
creator Hasan, Masad Mezher
González Álvarez, José Francisco
Qazi, Irfan Ali
Othman, Mohd Roslee
description This research analyzed and explored two different configurations of membranes, carbon dioxide selective and methane selective membranes, to produce processed biofuels (Fuel 2 and 3) from crude biogas plant (Fuel 1) for the first time. In addition, the effect of crude and processed fuels on gas turbine performance was researched in order to assess the viability of the biogas as a renewable resource to generate electrical power. Under optimum conditions that maximized product purity and recovery while keeping the operating parameters at a minimum level, carbon dioxide selective membrane produced methane purity of 87% and recovery of 90% (Fuel 2) at selectivity of 1084, stage cut of 0.31, and feed pressure of 32 bar. Methane selective membrane with selectivity of 746, stage cut of 0.65, and feed pressure of 35 bar produced processed biogas with higher methane purity of 95% and recovery of 92% (Fuel 3) than those from the carbon dioxide selective membrane. The processed fuel also was found to be the most compatible when used in the gas turbine. This can be noticed in the gas turbine graphs, as the processed fuels were found to nearly replicate the gas turbine working in design conditions with natural gas. Although the crude biogas (Fuel 1) containing 69% methane, 27% carbon dioxide and 4% water worked with the gas turbine with the highest efficiency, there were issues related to the highest fuel consumption and aerodynamic-related aspects. The upgraded biogases (Fuel 2 and 3) containing 87% and 95% methane, 9% and 5% carbon dioxide, 4% and 0% water, respectively on the other hand, provided an almost similar gas turbine performance with the natural gas. The use of the upgraded biogases in the gas turbine are important to ensure that the gas turbine works well as it is intended to perform. •Crude biogas worked with the gas turbine at the highest efficiency.•Untreated biogas however suffered from the highest fuel consumption and aerodynamic-related issues.•Upgraded biogases provided almost similar gas turbine performance with the natural gas.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.biombioe.2022.106530
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biombioe_2022_106530</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0961953422001921</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0961953422001921</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c227t-670e5b3a505ff0b54cf0c8a3a278cb7503227c8d606e092d9cc064535fe651a63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEURYMoWKt_QbJzNfUlmWRmdkrxCwpudB0ymZeSMpMZktbSf29qde0iPLjccyGHkFsGCwZM3W8WrR-H_HDBgfMcKingjMxYXYmCN9Cckxk0ihWNFOUluUppA8BKKNmM7J-cQ7tNdHR0wKGNJiCd4mgxJexoxIB70_ZI8_7aJOp22OdyoMFsd9H09Bh2mPw65HqOWh_wLtFp3GOk9mAzakL3w1E7hrQbpq0fwzW5cKZPePN75-Tz-elj-Vqs3l_elo-rwnJebQtVAcpWGAnSOWhlaR3Y2gjDq9q2lQSRa7buFCiEhneNtaBKKaRDJZlRYk7UadfGMaWITk_RDyYeNAN91Kc3-k-fPurTJ30ZfDiB-b_45THqZD0Gi52PWZjuRv_fxDf_M35n</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of membrane processed renewable biogas fuels on natural gas designed turbine's power cycle and fuel consumption</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Hasan, Masad Mezher ; González Álvarez, José Francisco ; Qazi, Irfan Ali ; Othman, Mohd Roslee</creator><creatorcontrib>Hasan, Masad Mezher ; González Álvarez, José Francisco ; Qazi, Irfan Ali ; Othman, Mohd Roslee</creatorcontrib><description>This research analyzed and explored two different configurations of membranes, carbon dioxide selective and methane selective membranes, to produce processed biofuels (Fuel 2 and 3) from crude biogas plant (Fuel 1) for the first time. In addition, the effect of crude and processed fuels on gas turbine performance was researched in order to assess the viability of the biogas as a renewable resource to generate electrical power. Under optimum conditions that maximized product purity and recovery while keeping the operating parameters at a minimum level, carbon dioxide selective membrane produced methane purity of 87% and recovery of 90% (Fuel 2) at selectivity of 1084, stage cut of 0.31, and feed pressure of 32 bar. Methane selective membrane with selectivity of 746, stage cut of 0.65, and feed pressure of 35 bar produced processed biogas with higher methane purity of 95% and recovery of 92% (Fuel 3) than those from the carbon dioxide selective membrane. The processed fuel also was found to be the most compatible when used in the gas turbine. This can be noticed in the gas turbine graphs, as the processed fuels were found to nearly replicate the gas turbine working in design conditions with natural gas. Although the crude biogas (Fuel 1) containing 69% methane, 27% carbon dioxide and 4% water worked with the gas turbine with the highest efficiency, there were issues related to the highest fuel consumption and aerodynamic-related aspects. The upgraded biogases (Fuel 2 and 3) containing 87% and 95% methane, 9% and 5% carbon dioxide, 4% and 0% water, respectively on the other hand, provided an almost similar gas turbine performance with the natural gas. The use of the upgraded biogases in the gas turbine are important to ensure that the gas turbine works well as it is intended to perform. •Crude biogas worked with the gas turbine at the highest efficiency.•Untreated biogas however suffered from the highest fuel consumption and aerodynamic-related issues.•Upgraded biogases provided almost similar gas turbine performance with the natural gas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0961-9534</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2909</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2022.106530</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Biogas ; Gas turbine ; Membrane ; Methane enrichment ; Renewable fuel</subject><ispartof>Biomass &amp; bioenergy, 2022-08, Vol.163, p.106530, Article 106530</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c227t-670e5b3a505ff0b54cf0c8a3a278cb7503227c8d606e092d9cc064535fe651a63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c227t-670e5b3a505ff0b54cf0c8a3a278cb7503227c8d606e092d9cc064535fe651a63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hasan, Masad Mezher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González Álvarez, José Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qazi, Irfan Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Othman, Mohd Roslee</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of membrane processed renewable biogas fuels on natural gas designed turbine's power cycle and fuel consumption</title><title>Biomass &amp; bioenergy</title><description>This research analyzed and explored two different configurations of membranes, carbon dioxide selective and methane selective membranes, to produce processed biofuels (Fuel 2 and 3) from crude biogas plant (Fuel 1) for the first time. In addition, the effect of crude and processed fuels on gas turbine performance was researched in order to assess the viability of the biogas as a renewable resource to generate electrical power. Under optimum conditions that maximized product purity and recovery while keeping the operating parameters at a minimum level, carbon dioxide selective membrane produced methane purity of 87% and recovery of 90% (Fuel 2) at selectivity of 1084, stage cut of 0.31, and feed pressure of 32 bar. Methane selective membrane with selectivity of 746, stage cut of 0.65, and feed pressure of 35 bar produced processed biogas with higher methane purity of 95% and recovery of 92% (Fuel 3) than those from the carbon dioxide selective membrane. The processed fuel also was found to be the most compatible when used in the gas turbine. This can be noticed in the gas turbine graphs, as the processed fuels were found to nearly replicate the gas turbine working in design conditions with natural gas. Although the crude biogas (Fuel 1) containing 69% methane, 27% carbon dioxide and 4% water worked with the gas turbine with the highest efficiency, there were issues related to the highest fuel consumption and aerodynamic-related aspects. The upgraded biogases (Fuel 2 and 3) containing 87% and 95% methane, 9% and 5% carbon dioxide, 4% and 0% water, respectively on the other hand, provided an almost similar gas turbine performance with the natural gas. The use of the upgraded biogases in the gas turbine are important to ensure that the gas turbine works well as it is intended to perform. •Crude biogas worked with the gas turbine at the highest efficiency.•Untreated biogas however suffered from the highest fuel consumption and aerodynamic-related issues.•Upgraded biogases provided almost similar gas turbine performance with the natural gas.</description><subject>Biogas</subject><subject>Gas turbine</subject><subject>Membrane</subject><subject>Methane enrichment</subject><subject>Renewable fuel</subject><issn>0961-9534</issn><issn>1873-2909</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEURYMoWKt_QbJzNfUlmWRmdkrxCwpudB0ymZeSMpMZktbSf29qde0iPLjccyGHkFsGCwZM3W8WrR-H_HDBgfMcKingjMxYXYmCN9Cckxk0ihWNFOUluUppA8BKKNmM7J-cQ7tNdHR0wKGNJiCd4mgxJexoxIB70_ZI8_7aJOp22OdyoMFsd9H09Bh2mPw65HqOWh_wLtFp3GOk9mAzakL3w1E7hrQbpq0fwzW5cKZPePN75-Tz-elj-Vqs3l_elo-rwnJebQtVAcpWGAnSOWhlaR3Y2gjDq9q2lQSRa7buFCiEhneNtaBKKaRDJZlRYk7UadfGMaWITk_RDyYeNAN91Kc3-k-fPurTJ30ZfDiB-b_45THqZD0Gi52PWZjuRv_fxDf_M35n</recordid><startdate>202208</startdate><enddate>202208</enddate><creator>Hasan, Masad Mezher</creator><creator>González Álvarez, José Francisco</creator><creator>Qazi, Irfan Ali</creator><creator>Othman, Mohd Roslee</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202208</creationdate><title>Effects of membrane processed renewable biogas fuels on natural gas designed turbine's power cycle and fuel consumption</title><author>Hasan, Masad Mezher ; González Álvarez, José Francisco ; Qazi, Irfan Ali ; Othman, Mohd Roslee</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c227t-670e5b3a505ff0b54cf0c8a3a278cb7503227c8d606e092d9cc064535fe651a63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Biogas</topic><topic>Gas turbine</topic><topic>Membrane</topic><topic>Methane enrichment</topic><topic>Renewable fuel</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hasan, Masad Mezher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González Álvarez, José Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qazi, Irfan Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Othman, Mohd Roslee</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Biomass &amp; bioenergy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hasan, Masad Mezher</au><au>González Álvarez, José Francisco</au><au>Qazi, Irfan Ali</au><au>Othman, Mohd Roslee</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of membrane processed renewable biogas fuels on natural gas designed turbine's power cycle and fuel consumption</atitle><jtitle>Biomass &amp; bioenergy</jtitle><date>2022-08</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>163</volume><spage>106530</spage><pages>106530-</pages><artnum>106530</artnum><issn>0961-9534</issn><eissn>1873-2909</eissn><abstract>This research analyzed and explored two different configurations of membranes, carbon dioxide selective and methane selective membranes, to produce processed biofuels (Fuel 2 and 3) from crude biogas plant (Fuel 1) for the first time. In addition, the effect of crude and processed fuels on gas turbine performance was researched in order to assess the viability of the biogas as a renewable resource to generate electrical power. Under optimum conditions that maximized product purity and recovery while keeping the operating parameters at a minimum level, carbon dioxide selective membrane produced methane purity of 87% and recovery of 90% (Fuel 2) at selectivity of 1084, stage cut of 0.31, and feed pressure of 32 bar. Methane selective membrane with selectivity of 746, stage cut of 0.65, and feed pressure of 35 bar produced processed biogas with higher methane purity of 95% and recovery of 92% (Fuel 3) than those from the carbon dioxide selective membrane. The processed fuel also was found to be the most compatible when used in the gas turbine. This can be noticed in the gas turbine graphs, as the processed fuels were found to nearly replicate the gas turbine working in design conditions with natural gas. Although the crude biogas (Fuel 1) containing 69% methane, 27% carbon dioxide and 4% water worked with the gas turbine with the highest efficiency, there were issues related to the highest fuel consumption and aerodynamic-related aspects. The upgraded biogases (Fuel 2 and 3) containing 87% and 95% methane, 9% and 5% carbon dioxide, 4% and 0% water, respectively on the other hand, provided an almost similar gas turbine performance with the natural gas. The use of the upgraded biogases in the gas turbine are important to ensure that the gas turbine works well as it is intended to perform. •Crude biogas worked with the gas turbine at the highest efficiency.•Untreated biogas however suffered from the highest fuel consumption and aerodynamic-related issues.•Upgraded biogases provided almost similar gas turbine performance with the natural gas.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.biombioe.2022.106530</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0961-9534
ispartof Biomass & bioenergy, 2022-08, Vol.163, p.106530, Article 106530
issn 0961-9534
1873-2909
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biombioe_2022_106530
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Biogas
Gas turbine
Membrane
Methane enrichment
Renewable fuel
title Effects of membrane processed renewable biogas fuels on natural gas designed turbine's power cycle and fuel consumption
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T23%3A34%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20membrane%20processed%20renewable%20biogas%20fuels%20on%20natural%20gas%20designed%20turbine's%20power%20cycle%20and%20fuel%20consumption&rft.jtitle=Biomass%20&%20bioenergy&rft.au=Hasan,%20Masad%20Mezher&rft.date=2022-08&rft.volume=163&rft.spage=106530&rft.pages=106530-&rft.artnum=106530&rft.issn=0961-9534&rft.eissn=1873-2909&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.biombioe.2022.106530&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES0961953422001921%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c227t-670e5b3a505ff0b54cf0c8a3a278cb7503227c8d606e092d9cc064535fe651a63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true