Loading…

Spatially variable pesticide application in vineyards: Part II, field comparison of uniform and map-based variable dose treatments

Reducing pesticide use is an important concern for many including the European Commission. One way to achieve this goal is to adjust the amount of pesticides in relation to canopy geometry and foliage. This objective currently poses an important challenge in vineyards with uniform vegetation but it...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biosystems engineering 2020-07, Vol.195, p.42-53
Main Authors: Román, Carla, Llorens, Jordi, Uribeetxebarria, Asier, Sanz, Ricardo, Planas, Santiago, Arnó, Jaume
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Reducing pesticide use is an important concern for many including the European Commission. One way to achieve this goal is to adjust the amount of pesticides in relation to canopy geometry and foliage. This objective currently poses an important challenge in vineyards with uniform vegetation but it is an added difficulty when the canopy shows spatial variability within the field. Is it possible to set a constant volume rate adjusted to this variability? Or is it more convenient to adjusting different volume rates based on a prescription map? Assuming a plant cell density (PCD) vegetation index from multispectral images to be optimal for detecting variations in vigour, two methods to adjust volume rates in spatially variable vineyards were proposed and tested: i) adjustment of a constant volume rate uniformly applied using a conventional sprayer, and ii) adjustment of two volume rates adapted to two vigour classes according to a prescription map. In both methods, PCD was previously correlated to the leaf area index (LAI), then taking the 70th percentile of LAI to determine adjusted volume rates through DOSA3D decision support system (www.dosa3d.cat/en). Leaf deposition with tracer was analysed to compare the proposed methods with the standard volume rate commonly used in the area. Statistical analysis showed no significant differences between treatments. Since pesticide savings can be achieved using the two methods, specifically 25.6% in adjusted uniform and 25.3% in adjusted map-based treatments, adjusted volume rate strategies can be recommended in vineyards with spatial variability. [Display omitted] •Plant cell density index (PCD) and LAI derived measures can be used to adjust spraying volume rates.•Geostatistical optimised PCD/LAI selection allows up to 25% pesticide savings without reducing treatment efficacy.•DOSA3D Decision Support System expands application to spatially variable vineyards.
ISSN:1537-5110
1537-5129
DOI:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2020.04.013