Carbon budgets and environmental controls in alpine ecosystems on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau

• Published in: Catena (Giessen) 2023-08, Vol.229, p.107224, Article 107224
• Main Authors: Ma, Wensi, Wu, Tonghua, Wu, Xiaodong, Yang, Sizhong, Li, Ren, Zhou, Shiqiao, Li, Xiangfei, Zhu, Xiaofan, Hao, Junming, Ni, Jie, Wang, Dong
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Alpine ecosystems; Carbon fluxes; Environmental controls; Q10; Qinghai-Tibet Plateau
• ISSN: 0341-8162; 1872-6887
• DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2023.107224

•Few attempts are made to analyze difference in carbon budget among alpine ecosystems.•Vegetation types and climatic condition determine carbon source/sink of ecosystems.•Carbon emissions in forest and alpine steppe ecosystems were more sensitive to warming.•Water forcing were strong predictors of carbon flux in alpine steppe, meadow ecosystems.•Carbon fluxes of forest and cropland ecosystems were depend on temperature forcing. Rapid warming in alpine regions exerts important effects on carbon cycling in alpine ecosystem, which are sensitive to environmental changes. So far, little is known about the spatial and temporal variation in carbon budgets and the main influencing factors over different ecosystems. Here, we examined the monthly and annual gross primary production (GPP), net ecosystem CO2 exchange (NEE) and ecosystem respiration (ER) during 2004–2017 in four types of ecosystems (i.e., alpine meadow, steppe, forest and cropland) on the Tibetan Plateau. We explored the relationships between carbon fluxes and environmental factors. The results show that forest, cropland and alpine meadow ecosystems acted as carbon sinks, with NEE values ranging from −21.25 ± 3.54 to −308.75 ± 21.65 g C m-2a-1, while alpine steppe and overmature forest ecosystems serve as carbon sources (mean annual NEE: 23.12 ± 15.88 g C m-2a-1). The temperature sensitivity values (Q10) of ER in the forest (9.39) and alpine steppe (7.47) ecosystems were greater than those in the alpine meadow ecosystems (Q10 = 4.20), indicating that the carbon emissions in the forest and alpine steppe ecosystems were more sensitive to warming. Multiple linear regression analysis indicated that the carbon fluxes (GPP, NEE, ER) of alpine steppe and alpine meadow in the permafrost regions were more sensitive to water forcing (precipitation, soil water content), while in the forest and cropland ecosystems temperature forcing (air and soil temperature) were strong predictors of all the carbon flux indices. Our results showed differential responses of carbon budgets among ecosystems, which could be considered in the future modeling of carbon cycle in alpine regions.