Fouling management in oceanic carbon capture via in-situ electrochemical bipolar membrane electrodialysis

• Published in: Chemical engineering journal (Lausanne, Switzerland : 1996) Switzerland : 1996), 2023-02, Vol.458, p.141407, Article 141407
• Main Authors: Sharifian, R., van der Wal, H.C., Wagterveld, R.M., Vermaas, D.A.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Bipolar membrane; CO2 capture; Electrochemical; In-situ mineralization; Oceanic carbon capture; pH-swing
• ISSN: 1385-8947; 1873-3212
• DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2023.141407

[Display omitted] •Carbon is extracted from artificial seawater as CaCO3 via a pH-swing.•Higher current density / lower flow rate induces accelerated fouling in (BPM)ED.•Using no cation exchange membranes delays fouling by an order of magnitude.•Only acid wash is able to clean the fouled stack to acceptable levels. To assist reaching net-zero emissions, the dissolved carbon in the ocean can be extracted to enable an indirect air capture. An electrochemical bipolar membrane electrodialysis (BPMED) is a sustainable method for such capture. The BPMED enables a pH-swing that manipulates the oceanic carbonate-equilibrium using electricity. However, at alkaline-pH, an in-situ process suffers from inorganic fouling within the stack, increasing the cost of capture. In the current work, we investigate fouling management strategies including fouling control (i.e., membrane- configuration and current-flow rate optimization) and fouling removal methods. Fouling removal methods including air and CO2(g) sparging, dissolved CO2 (aq) cleaning, back-pressure, flow rate increase, and acid-wash are investigated under accelerated fouling conditions. The stack configuration containing the BPM-AEM pairs shows 4 × lower fouling than the BPM-CEM stack, while the carbonate-extraction and faradaic efficiency are similar for both configurations. From the scaling removal methods, only the acid wash combined with the back-pressure removed all the inorganic fouling, recovering both the cell voltage and pressure drop to their initial values. Upon the air sparging, the total cell voltage and pressure drop increased even more due to the trapped gas inside the netted spacers. Cleaning via dissolved and gaseous CO2 decreases the cell pH, dissolving hydroxide/carbonate-based fouling, but decreases the carbonate-removal significantly which is not preferred. Applying the back-pressure and higher flow rates decelerated the scaling buildup but was not enough to remove the fouling. Using BPM-AEM stacks in combination with periodic acid cleaning has potential as resilient oceanic carbon removal via BPMED.