Association of Neoproterozoic A- and I-type granites in South China: Implications for generation of A-type granites in a subduction-related environment

• Published in: Chemical geology 2008-11, Vol.257 (1), p.1-15
• Main Authors: Zhao, Xin-Fu, Zhou, Mei-Fu, Li, Jian-Wei, Wu, Fu-Yuan
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: A-type granite; Charnockite; I-type granite; Neoproterozoic; Yangtze Block
• ISSN: 0009-2541; 1872-6836
• DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.07.018

Neoproterozoic magmatism in the Yangtze Block of South China produced voluminous S- and I-type granites, and sparse A-type granites. The Daxiangling A-type granitic pluton is spatially associated with the Shimian I-type pluton at the western margin of the Yangtze Block. Both plutons have similar SHRIMP zircon U–Pb ages of ∼ 800 Ma and are slightly younger than the tonalite–trondhjemite–granodiorite (TTG) gneisses in the area. The Shimian pluton is composed of granite and monzogranite with high SiO 2 (69.3–76.6 wt.%), Na 2O (2.79–3.80 wt.%) and K 2O (3.94–5.87 wt.%), and low Fe 2O 3 (0.96–3.06 wt.%) and MgO (0.12–0.50 wt.%). The Daxiangling pluton consists of alkali–feldspar granites with higher SiO 2 (76.3–79.3 wt.%) and lower Al 2O 3 (10.6–11.9 wt.%) and CaO (0.21–0.55 wt.%) than the Shimian granites. Both plutons are slightly peraluminous (A/CNK = 1.00–1.12) and belong to the high-K, calc-alkaline series. The Daxiangling alkali-feldspar granites have much higher Zr, Hf, Ga and HREE, and lower Sr than the Shimian granites. On the chondrite-normalized REE diagram, both plutons are enriched in LREE, but the rocks of the Daxiangling pluton show relatively flat patterns because of their higher HREE contents. Their primitive-mantle normalized spidergrams display negative Eu, Nb, Ta, Sr, P and Ti anomalies. Both plutons have nearly identical whole-rock Nd and zircon Hf isotopic compositions ( ε Nd( t) = + 1 and ε Hf( t) = + 5 to + 9), similar to the TTG gneisses. We suggest that the I-type granites of the Shimian pluton were produced by dehydration melting of the TTG rocks as a result of underplating of mantle-derived mafic magmas. The rocks above the I-type magma source may have been converted to charnockites by heating and dehydration. With increasing temperatures, the charnockites underwent partial melting at temperatures > 900 °C to produce A-type magmas. Both the A- and I-type granites formed at an extensional active continental margin, perhaps in a back-arc environment. A-type granites with mantle-like isotopic signatures may be reworked or recycled from juvenile crustal rocks. The association of A- and I-type granites suggests that aluminous A-type granite is most probably derived from a charnockite source heated by large-scale magmatic underplating, rather than a tonalite source.