Automated online coupling of robot-assisted single drop microextraction and liquid chromatography

• Published in: Journal of Chromatography A 2019-06, Vol.1595, p.66-72
• Main Authors: Medina, Deyber Arley Vargas, Rodríguez Cabal, Luis Felipe, Titato, Guilherme Miola, Lanças, Fernando Mauro, Santos-Neto, Álvaro José
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Automation; Liquid chromatography; Mass spectrometry; Microextraction; Sample preparation
• ISSN: 0021-9673
• DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2019.02.036

•An automated high-throughput analytical setup has been developed.•SDME and LC were online integrated in an automated fashion for first time.•Extractant large drops were exploiting and online transferred to the LC system.•Online SDME proved to be a fast strategy for the determination of trace pollutants. A high-throughput and innovative setup has been developed to automate the online integration of single drop microextraction (SDME), liquid chromatography (LC) and high-resolution mass spectrometry (QqToF). SDME and LC were online hyphenated for the first time. SDME was carried out by a lab-made cartesian robot actuating a 100 μL syringe, equipped with a three-way solenoid microvalve that allowed the online transference of the enriched extract to the chromatographic system, through a six-port switching valve. The complete method, including the synchronized robot action, valves, and the analytical instruments, was controlled by an Arduino Mega board. The merits of the proposed setup were demonstrated by the triazines determination in coconut water samples. The most relevant extraction parameters, such as drop size, exposure time, stirring effect, salt addition and pH were systematically investigated. Under optimized conditions (60 μL drop volume and 10 min extraction time), the LC-UV enrichment factors (EF) and the extraction recoveries (ER) ranged between 15.2–18.4 and 11.4–13.8%, respectively. Using the SDME-LC–MS setup, the linear range, detection limit (S/N = 3) and precision (RSD, n = 6 at 0.25 μg L−1 level of concentration) were 0.25–25 μg L−1, 0.10 μg L−1 and 16.8% for simazine; 0.25–25 μg L−1, 0.05 μg L−1 and 14.7% for atrazine; and 0.25–25 μg L−1, 0.05 μg L−1 and 18.5% for propazine, respectively. Although none of the analytes were detected in the evaluated commercial samples, the results indicate that the proposed online SDME-LC setup is a competitive analytical strategy for the determination of target organic compounds in complex matrices.