Loading…

A shortage risk mitigation model for multi-agency coordination in logistics planning

•The model accounts for uncertainty in supply, demand and transportation.•The multi-objective formulation balances efficiency and effectiveness.•The model is applied to real information of floods in Veracruz, Mexico.•The results show the importance of considering stochastic formulations for disaster...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Computers & industrial engineering 2020-10, Vol.148, p.106676, Article 106676
Main Authors: Rodríguez-Espíndola, Oscar, Alem, Douglas, Pelegrin Da Silva, Lucas
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•The model accounts for uncertainty in supply, demand and transportation.•The multi-objective formulation balances efficiency and effectiveness.•The model is applied to real information of floods in Veracruz, Mexico.•The results show the importance of considering stochastic formulations for disasters.•Disaster management models can benefit from optimizing the participants involved. We introduce a two-stage stochastic program to handle typical disaster preparedness activities under uncertainty from a multi-agency perspective. The model explicitly takes into account the number of people without healthcare attention, relief aid, and shelter support. We build a function that represents the total number of people at risk of not receiving proper humanitarian assistance using a bi-objective approach in which expected logistics costs are also minimized. The benefit of our approach is assessed through real flood cases in Mexico in which GIS analysis was used to enhance data gathering and to provide risk maps that could be potentially used by policy-makers in practical settings. The overall results suggest that sheltering decisions have to be closely coordinated with the management of material and human resources to avoid an increased number of people deprived of attention and relief aid. The Pareto Frontier also reveals that some solutions exhibit a quite interesting trade-off, e.g., it is possible to improve the overall relief assistance by almost 17% at the expense of less than 14% in the logistics costs.
ISSN:0360-8352
1879-0550
DOI:10.1016/j.cie.2020.106676