Loading…

Factors predictive of roof instability in addition to the existing CMRR criteria at two case study coal mines

This work uses two underground longwall coal mines located in the Western US (Mines A and B) as case studies to investigate which parameters are indicative of roof fall potential, and whether the Coal Mine Roof Rating (CMRR) is predictive of stability at these mines. Data were collected at 30 sites...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of coal geology 2019-09, Vol.213, p.103255, Article 103255
Main Authors: Young, Meriel, Walton, Gabriel, Holley, Elizabeth
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-dea6cc37f9ec0feebe048a8125f13d0f71665713730a9d04921d7b774588814e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-dea6cc37f9ec0feebe048a8125f13d0f71665713730a9d04921d7b774588814e3
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 103255
container_title International journal of coal geology
container_volume 213
creator Young, Meriel
Walton, Gabriel
Holley, Elizabeth
description This work uses two underground longwall coal mines located in the Western US (Mines A and B) as case studies to investigate which parameters are indicative of roof fall potential, and whether the Coal Mine Roof Rating (CMRR) is predictive of stability at these mines. Data were collected at 30 sites in each mine. These data sets included the CMRR, a record of the roof stability and a series of non-CMRR parameters thought to also be potentially indicative of roof stability but which are not included in the CMRR. These data were then statistically analyzed for correlation between CMRR and roof stability. The CMRR was found to be moderately effective at Mine A but not effective at Mine B. At Mine A, faulting was found to be the primary control on roof stability. Topographic curvature, slope angle and depth of cover were found to have reasonable predictive capability for assessment of roof stability category at Mine B based on a logistic regression analysis. These differences in roof stability controls are likely due, at least in part, to the unusual topography above Mine B, with differential erosion resulting in a landscape of flat plateaus and sharp river valleys. It is likely that these sudden changes in slope and topography lead to in-situ stress rotation and the development of shear stresses near the excavation at Mine B. This, combined with a lack of major discontinuities such as slickensides, which are central to the CMRR system, explains why the CMRR is much less effective at predicting roof stability at Mine B compared to Mine A. •Excavation span, topographic effects/stress & depth of cover = additional controls•Few localized discontinuities or steep/varied topography mean the CMRR may not apply.•The CMRR is more applicable to mines with a high incidence of localized faulting.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.coal.2019.103255
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_coal_2019_103255</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0166516219303477</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0166516219303477</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-dea6cc37f9ec0feebe048a8125f13d0f71665713730a9d04921d7b774588814e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kN1KAzEQhYMoWH9ewKt5ga3JbnazC95IsSpUhKLXIU1mdUq7KUms9u3NUq-9mRkOc4YzH2M3gk8FF83temq92UxLLrosVGVdn7CJaFVZqFbyUzbJS01Ri6Y8ZxcxrjkXist6wrZzY5MPEXYBHdlEewTfQ_C50BCTWdGG0iHPYJyjRH6A5CF9IuAPxUTDB8xelkuwgRIGMmASpG8P1kSEmL7cAcZosKUB4xU7680m4vVfv2Tv84e32VOxeH18nt0vCltJmQqHprG2Un2HlveIK-SyNa0o615UjvcqP1MrUamKm85x2ZXCqZVSsm7bVkisLll5vGuDjzFgr3eBtiYctOB6BKbXekylR2D6CCyb7o4mzMn2hEFHSzjYzCWgTdp5-s_-C32gdSY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factors predictive of roof instability in addition to the existing CMRR criteria at two case study coal mines</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Young, Meriel ; Walton, Gabriel ; Holley, Elizabeth</creator><creatorcontrib>Young, Meriel ; Walton, Gabriel ; Holley, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><description>This work uses two underground longwall coal mines located in the Western US (Mines A and B) as case studies to investigate which parameters are indicative of roof fall potential, and whether the Coal Mine Roof Rating (CMRR) is predictive of stability at these mines. Data were collected at 30 sites in each mine. These data sets included the CMRR, a record of the roof stability and a series of non-CMRR parameters thought to also be potentially indicative of roof stability but which are not included in the CMRR. These data were then statistically analyzed for correlation between CMRR and roof stability. The CMRR was found to be moderately effective at Mine A but not effective at Mine B. At Mine A, faulting was found to be the primary control on roof stability. Topographic curvature, slope angle and depth of cover were found to have reasonable predictive capability for assessment of roof stability category at Mine B based on a logistic regression analysis. These differences in roof stability controls are likely due, at least in part, to the unusual topography above Mine B, with differential erosion resulting in a landscape of flat plateaus and sharp river valleys. It is likely that these sudden changes in slope and topography lead to in-situ stress rotation and the development of shear stresses near the excavation at Mine B. This, combined with a lack of major discontinuities such as slickensides, which are central to the CMRR system, explains why the CMRR is much less effective at predicting roof stability at Mine B compared to Mine A. •Excavation span, topographic effects/stress &amp; depth of cover = additional controls•Few localized discontinuities or steep/varied topography mean the CMRR may not apply.•The CMRR is more applicable to mines with a high incidence of localized faulting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0166-5162</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7840</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.coal.2019.103255</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>CMRR ; Coal mine roof stability ; Depth ; Stress ; Topographic effects ; Western U.S. coal</subject><ispartof>International journal of coal geology, 2019-09, Vol.213, p.103255, Article 103255</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-dea6cc37f9ec0feebe048a8125f13d0f71665713730a9d04921d7b774588814e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-dea6cc37f9ec0feebe048a8125f13d0f71665713730a9d04921d7b774588814e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Young, Meriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walton, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holley, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><title>Factors predictive of roof instability in addition to the existing CMRR criteria at two case study coal mines</title><title>International journal of coal geology</title><description>This work uses two underground longwall coal mines located in the Western US (Mines A and B) as case studies to investigate which parameters are indicative of roof fall potential, and whether the Coal Mine Roof Rating (CMRR) is predictive of stability at these mines. Data were collected at 30 sites in each mine. These data sets included the CMRR, a record of the roof stability and a series of non-CMRR parameters thought to also be potentially indicative of roof stability but which are not included in the CMRR. These data were then statistically analyzed for correlation between CMRR and roof stability. The CMRR was found to be moderately effective at Mine A but not effective at Mine B. At Mine A, faulting was found to be the primary control on roof stability. Topographic curvature, slope angle and depth of cover were found to have reasonable predictive capability for assessment of roof stability category at Mine B based on a logistic regression analysis. These differences in roof stability controls are likely due, at least in part, to the unusual topography above Mine B, with differential erosion resulting in a landscape of flat plateaus and sharp river valleys. It is likely that these sudden changes in slope and topography lead to in-situ stress rotation and the development of shear stresses near the excavation at Mine B. This, combined with a lack of major discontinuities such as slickensides, which are central to the CMRR system, explains why the CMRR is much less effective at predicting roof stability at Mine B compared to Mine A. •Excavation span, topographic effects/stress &amp; depth of cover = additional controls•Few localized discontinuities or steep/varied topography mean the CMRR may not apply.•The CMRR is more applicable to mines with a high incidence of localized faulting.</description><subject>CMRR</subject><subject>Coal mine roof stability</subject><subject>Depth</subject><subject>Stress</subject><subject>Topographic effects</subject><subject>Western U.S. coal</subject><issn>0166-5162</issn><issn>1872-7840</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kN1KAzEQhYMoWH9ewKt5ga3JbnazC95IsSpUhKLXIU1mdUq7KUms9u3NUq-9mRkOc4YzH2M3gk8FF83temq92UxLLrosVGVdn7CJaFVZqFbyUzbJS01Ri6Y8ZxcxrjkXist6wrZzY5MPEXYBHdlEewTfQ_C50BCTWdGG0iHPYJyjRH6A5CF9IuAPxUTDB8xelkuwgRIGMmASpG8P1kSEmL7cAcZosKUB4xU7680m4vVfv2Tv84e32VOxeH18nt0vCltJmQqHprG2Un2HlveIK-SyNa0o615UjvcqP1MrUamKm85x2ZXCqZVSsm7bVkisLll5vGuDjzFgr3eBtiYctOB6BKbXekylR2D6CCyb7o4mzMn2hEFHSzjYzCWgTdp5-s_-C32gdSY</recordid><startdate>20190901</startdate><enddate>20190901</enddate><creator>Young, Meriel</creator><creator>Walton, Gabriel</creator><creator>Holley, Elizabeth</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190901</creationdate><title>Factors predictive of roof instability in addition to the existing CMRR criteria at two case study coal mines</title><author>Young, Meriel ; Walton, Gabriel ; Holley, Elizabeth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-dea6cc37f9ec0feebe048a8125f13d0f71665713730a9d04921d7b774588814e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>CMRR</topic><topic>Coal mine roof stability</topic><topic>Depth</topic><topic>Stress</topic><topic>Topographic effects</topic><topic>Western U.S. coal</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Young, Meriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walton, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holley, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International journal of coal geology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Young, Meriel</au><au>Walton, Gabriel</au><au>Holley, Elizabeth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factors predictive of roof instability in addition to the existing CMRR criteria at two case study coal mines</atitle><jtitle>International journal of coal geology</jtitle><date>2019-09-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>213</volume><spage>103255</spage><pages>103255-</pages><artnum>103255</artnum><issn>0166-5162</issn><eissn>1872-7840</eissn><abstract>This work uses two underground longwall coal mines located in the Western US (Mines A and B) as case studies to investigate which parameters are indicative of roof fall potential, and whether the Coal Mine Roof Rating (CMRR) is predictive of stability at these mines. Data were collected at 30 sites in each mine. These data sets included the CMRR, a record of the roof stability and a series of non-CMRR parameters thought to also be potentially indicative of roof stability but which are not included in the CMRR. These data were then statistically analyzed for correlation between CMRR and roof stability. The CMRR was found to be moderately effective at Mine A but not effective at Mine B. At Mine A, faulting was found to be the primary control on roof stability. Topographic curvature, slope angle and depth of cover were found to have reasonable predictive capability for assessment of roof stability category at Mine B based on a logistic regression analysis. These differences in roof stability controls are likely due, at least in part, to the unusual topography above Mine B, with differential erosion resulting in a landscape of flat plateaus and sharp river valleys. It is likely that these sudden changes in slope and topography lead to in-situ stress rotation and the development of shear stresses near the excavation at Mine B. This, combined with a lack of major discontinuities such as slickensides, which are central to the CMRR system, explains why the CMRR is much less effective at predicting roof stability at Mine B compared to Mine A. •Excavation span, topographic effects/stress &amp; depth of cover = additional controls•Few localized discontinuities or steep/varied topography mean the CMRR may not apply.•The CMRR is more applicable to mines with a high incidence of localized faulting.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.coal.2019.103255</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0166-5162
ispartof International journal of coal geology, 2019-09, Vol.213, p.103255, Article 103255
issn 0166-5162
1872-7840
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_coal_2019_103255
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects CMRR
Coal mine roof stability
Depth
Stress
Topographic effects
Western U.S. coal
title Factors predictive of roof instability in addition to the existing CMRR criteria at two case study coal mines
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T16%3A47%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors%20predictive%20of%20roof%20instability%20in%20addition%20to%20the%20existing%20CMRR%20criteria%20at%20two%20case%20study%20coal%20mines&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20coal%20geology&rft.au=Young,%20Meriel&rft.date=2019-09-01&rft.volume=213&rft.spage=103255&rft.pages=103255-&rft.artnum=103255&rft.issn=0166-5162&rft.eissn=1872-7840&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.coal.2019.103255&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES0166516219303477%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-dea6cc37f9ec0feebe048a8125f13d0f71665713730a9d04921d7b774588814e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true