Loading…

Cognizance in cognitive development: A longitudinal study

•There is a central core of self-awareness (or cognizance) underlying awareness of one’s own and others’ mental states.•Cognizance mediates between executive and reasoning process; mediation is phase-specific.•Theory of mind may be redundant if other forms of cognitive awareness are measured.•There...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cognitive development 2019-10, Vol.52, p.100805, Article 100805
Main Authors: Kazi, Smaragda, Kazali, Elena, Makris, Nikolaos, Spanoudis, George, Demetriou, Andreas
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-15cfb1ee18815144ad53f39d528a16c513b064510d864a8540b1cce7a8895cf43
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-15cfb1ee18815144ad53f39d528a16c513b064510d864a8540b1cce7a8895cf43
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 100805
container_title Cognitive development
container_volume 52
creator Kazi, Smaragda
Kazali, Elena
Makris, Nikolaos
Spanoudis, George
Demetriou, Andreas
description •There is a central core of self-awareness (or cognizance) underlying awareness of one’s own and others’ mental states.•Cognizance mediates between executive and reasoning process; mediation is phase-specific.•Theory of mind may be redundant if other forms of cognitive awareness are measured.•There is a general factor of change orchestrating change across processes. This study explored longitudinally how cognizance mediates between executive and reasoning process from 4 to 10 years of age. Four-, 6-, and 8-years old children were tested twice by executive (inhibition, flexibility in shifting, and working memory), cognizance (awareness of perceptual and inferential origins of knowledge, first- and second-order ToM, and awareness of similarities and differences between cognitive processes), and reasoning tasks (deductive and Raven-like fluid reasoning tasks). Perceptual awareness, first-order ToM, and simple inductive and deductive reasoning were acquired at preschool; inferential awareness, awareness of cognitive processes, and relational and deductive reasoning were mastered later in childhood. The various processes preserved their relative functional autonomy; however, there were two factors standing for their interactions: one for the state of ability at a time and one for general change dynamics. Latent change score modeling and latent transition analysis showed that cognizance was the best proxy of the general change factor collecting reasoning and executive influences early and leading transitions to higher level reasoning later. Implications for developmental, psychometric, and developmental psychopathology theories are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cogdev.2019.100805
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cogdev_2019_100805</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0885201419300474</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0885201419300474</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-15cfb1ee18815144ad53f39d528a16c513b064510d864a8540b1cce7a8895cf43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9j81KxDAURoMoWEffwEVfoDW3TTqpC2EoOgoDbhTchTS5LSmddGhqYXx6U-ra1f3jfNxDyD3QFCgUD12qh9bgnGYUyrCigvILEoHYlkmWFV-XJKJC8CSc2TW58b6jASs5RKSshtbZH-U0xtbFepkmO2Mc4rAfTkd002O8i_vBtXb6NtapPvahOd-Sq0b1Hu_-6oZ8vjx_VK_J4X3_Vu0Oic5pMSXAdVMDIggBHBhThudNXhqeCQWF5pDXtGAcqBEFU4IzWoPWuFVClAFl-YawNVePg_cjNvI02qMazxKoXPRlJ1d9uejLVT9gTyuG4bfZ4ii9thg0jR1RT9IM9v-AXwiKZNQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cognizance in cognitive development: A longitudinal study</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Kazi, Smaragda ; Kazali, Elena ; Makris, Nikolaos ; Spanoudis, George ; Demetriou, Andreas</creator><creatorcontrib>Kazi, Smaragda ; Kazali, Elena ; Makris, Nikolaos ; Spanoudis, George ; Demetriou, Andreas</creatorcontrib><description>•There is a central core of self-awareness (or cognizance) underlying awareness of one’s own and others’ mental states.•Cognizance mediates between executive and reasoning process; mediation is phase-specific.•Theory of mind may be redundant if other forms of cognitive awareness are measured.•There is a general factor of change orchestrating change across processes. This study explored longitudinally how cognizance mediates between executive and reasoning process from 4 to 10 years of age. Four-, 6-, and 8-years old children were tested twice by executive (inhibition, flexibility in shifting, and working memory), cognizance (awareness of perceptual and inferential origins of knowledge, first- and second-order ToM, and awareness of similarities and differences between cognitive processes), and reasoning tasks (deductive and Raven-like fluid reasoning tasks). Perceptual awareness, first-order ToM, and simple inductive and deductive reasoning were acquired at preschool; inferential awareness, awareness of cognitive processes, and relational and deductive reasoning were mastered later in childhood. The various processes preserved their relative functional autonomy; however, there were two factors standing for their interactions: one for the state of ability at a time and one for general change dynamics. Latent change score modeling and latent transition analysis showed that cognizance was the best proxy of the general change factor collecting reasoning and executive influences early and leading transitions to higher level reasoning later. Implications for developmental, psychometric, and developmental psychopathology theories are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-2014</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-226X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2019.100805</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Self-awareness</subject><ispartof>Cognitive development, 2019-10, Vol.52, p.100805, Article 100805</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-15cfb1ee18815144ad53f39d528a16c513b064510d864a8540b1cce7a8895cf43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-15cfb1ee18815144ad53f39d528a16c513b064510d864a8540b1cce7a8895cf43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kazi, Smaragda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kazali, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makris, Nikolaos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spanoudis, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demetriou, Andreas</creatorcontrib><title>Cognizance in cognitive development: A longitudinal study</title><title>Cognitive development</title><description>•There is a central core of self-awareness (or cognizance) underlying awareness of one’s own and others’ mental states.•Cognizance mediates between executive and reasoning process; mediation is phase-specific.•Theory of mind may be redundant if other forms of cognitive awareness are measured.•There is a general factor of change orchestrating change across processes. This study explored longitudinally how cognizance mediates between executive and reasoning process from 4 to 10 years of age. Four-, 6-, and 8-years old children were tested twice by executive (inhibition, flexibility in shifting, and working memory), cognizance (awareness of perceptual and inferential origins of knowledge, first- and second-order ToM, and awareness of similarities and differences between cognitive processes), and reasoning tasks (deductive and Raven-like fluid reasoning tasks). Perceptual awareness, first-order ToM, and simple inductive and deductive reasoning were acquired at preschool; inferential awareness, awareness of cognitive processes, and relational and deductive reasoning were mastered later in childhood. The various processes preserved their relative functional autonomy; however, there were two factors standing for their interactions: one for the state of ability at a time and one for general change dynamics. Latent change score modeling and latent transition analysis showed that cognizance was the best proxy of the general change factor collecting reasoning and executive influences early and leading transitions to higher level reasoning later. Implications for developmental, psychometric, and developmental psychopathology theories are discussed.</description><subject>Self-awareness</subject><issn>0885-2014</issn><issn>1879-226X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9j81KxDAURoMoWEffwEVfoDW3TTqpC2EoOgoDbhTchTS5LSmddGhqYXx6U-ra1f3jfNxDyD3QFCgUD12qh9bgnGYUyrCigvILEoHYlkmWFV-XJKJC8CSc2TW58b6jASs5RKSshtbZH-U0xtbFepkmO2Mc4rAfTkd002O8i_vBtXb6NtapPvahOd-Sq0b1Hu_-6oZ8vjx_VK_J4X3_Vu0Oic5pMSXAdVMDIggBHBhThudNXhqeCQWF5pDXtGAcqBEFU4IzWoPWuFVClAFl-YawNVePg_cjNvI02qMazxKoXPRlJ1d9uejLVT9gTyuG4bfZ4ii9thg0jR1RT9IM9v-AXwiKZNQ</recordid><startdate>201910</startdate><enddate>201910</enddate><creator>Kazi, Smaragda</creator><creator>Kazali, Elena</creator><creator>Makris, Nikolaos</creator><creator>Spanoudis, George</creator><creator>Demetriou, Andreas</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201910</creationdate><title>Cognizance in cognitive development: A longitudinal study</title><author>Kazi, Smaragda ; Kazali, Elena ; Makris, Nikolaos ; Spanoudis, George ; Demetriou, Andreas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-15cfb1ee18815144ad53f39d528a16c513b064510d864a8540b1cce7a8895cf43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Self-awareness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kazi, Smaragda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kazali, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makris, Nikolaos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spanoudis, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demetriou, Andreas</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Cognitive development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kazi, Smaragda</au><au>Kazali, Elena</au><au>Makris, Nikolaos</au><au>Spanoudis, George</au><au>Demetriou, Andreas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cognizance in cognitive development: A longitudinal study</atitle><jtitle>Cognitive development</jtitle><date>2019-10</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>52</volume><spage>100805</spage><pages>100805-</pages><artnum>100805</artnum><issn>0885-2014</issn><eissn>1879-226X</eissn><abstract>•There is a central core of self-awareness (or cognizance) underlying awareness of one’s own and others’ mental states.•Cognizance mediates between executive and reasoning process; mediation is phase-specific.•Theory of mind may be redundant if other forms of cognitive awareness are measured.•There is a general factor of change orchestrating change across processes. This study explored longitudinally how cognizance mediates between executive and reasoning process from 4 to 10 years of age. Four-, 6-, and 8-years old children were tested twice by executive (inhibition, flexibility in shifting, and working memory), cognizance (awareness of perceptual and inferential origins of knowledge, first- and second-order ToM, and awareness of similarities and differences between cognitive processes), and reasoning tasks (deductive and Raven-like fluid reasoning tasks). Perceptual awareness, first-order ToM, and simple inductive and deductive reasoning were acquired at preschool; inferential awareness, awareness of cognitive processes, and relational and deductive reasoning were mastered later in childhood. The various processes preserved their relative functional autonomy; however, there were two factors standing for their interactions: one for the state of ability at a time and one for general change dynamics. Latent change score modeling and latent transition analysis showed that cognizance was the best proxy of the general change factor collecting reasoning and executive influences early and leading transitions to higher level reasoning later. Implications for developmental, psychometric, and developmental psychopathology theories are discussed.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.cogdev.2019.100805</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0885-2014
ispartof Cognitive development, 2019-10, Vol.52, p.100805, Article 100805
issn 0885-2014
1879-226X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cogdev_2019_100805
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Self-awareness
title Cognizance in cognitive development: A longitudinal study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T06%3A12%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cognizance%20in%20cognitive%20development:%20A%20longitudinal%20study&rft.jtitle=Cognitive%20development&rft.au=Kazi,%20Smaragda&rft.date=2019-10&rft.volume=52&rft.spage=100805&rft.pages=100805-&rft.artnum=100805&rft.issn=0885-2014&rft.eissn=1879-226X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cogdev.2019.100805&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES0885201419300474%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-15cfb1ee18815144ad53f39d528a16c513b064510d864a8540b1cce7a8895cf43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true