Loading…

Experimental fatigue crack growth and crack-front shape analysis of asymmetric repaired aluminium panels with glass/epoxy composite patches

In this study, we investigate the experimental fatigue crack-growth behaviour of centrally cracked aluminium panels in mode-I condition which have been repaired with single-side composite patches. It shows that the crack growths non-uniformly from its initial location through the thickness of the si...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Composite structures 2005-12, Vol.71 (3), p.401-406
Main Authors: Hosseini-Toudeshky, H., Sadeghi, G., Daghyani, H.R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In this study, we investigate the experimental fatigue crack-growth behaviour of centrally cracked aluminium panels in mode-I condition which have been repaired with single-side composite patches. It shows that the crack growths non-uniformly from its initial location through the thickness of the single-side repaired panels. The propagated crack-front shapes are preformed for various repaired panels with different patch thicknesses. It is shown that there are considerable differences between the crack-front shapes obtained for thin repaired panels with various patch thicknesses. However, the crack-front shapes of thick repaired panels are not significantly changed with various patch thicknesses. Furthermore, effects of patch thickness on the crack growth life of the repaired panels are investigated for two typical thin and thick panel thicknesses. It shows that the crack growth life of thin panels may increase up to 236% using a 16 layers patch. However, for thick panels, the life may extended about 21–35% using a 4 layers patch, and implementing 8 and 16 layers patches has not a significant effect on the life extension with respect to the 4 layers patch life.
ISSN:0263-8223
1879-1085
DOI:10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.09.032